Specifications for inspection and acceptance of surveying and mapping products
Some standard content:
Standard of the Surveying and Mapping Industry of the People's Republic of China
Specifications for inspection and acceptance of surveying and mapping products
Specifications for inspection and acceptance of surveying and mapping products1 Subject content and scope of application
CH 1002—1995
This standard specifies the requirements for quality inspection and acceptance of surveying and mapping products, the quality characteristics of surveying and mapping products and the proportion of detailed inspection in acceptance.
This standard is applicable to the inspection and acceptance of surveying and mapping products produced in accordance with national standards and industry standards. The inspection and acceptance of other surveying and mapping products can be implemented as a reference.
2 Terminology
2.1 Unit product
The basic unit divided for the needs of implementing sampling inspection. For example: various levels of triangulation points, traverse points, GPS points, astronomical points, leveling sections, gravity points, etc. in geodetic survey products with "points" or "sections" as units; various scale topographic maps, image planes, etc. in photogrammetry and remote sensing mapping products and map making and printing products with "sheets" as units; various scale cadastral surveying and mapping results in "sheets" as units in cadastral surveying and mapping products, etc.
2.2 Inspection batch (abbreviation: batch)
Unit products collected for sampling inspection. 2.3 Sample unit
Unit products extracted from the batch for inspection. 2.4 Sample
All unit products extracted from the batch for inspection. 2.5 Quality characteristics
Product quality characteristics that meet user requirements and usage purposes, combined with the base and surveying and mapping products, can be summarized into technical performance, technical indicators, appearance finishing and other quality characteristics.
The proportion of each quality characteristic of a unit product in the quality of the entire unit product. 2.7 Random sampling
Select n individuals from a population of N individuals. When sampling, all unit products that constitute the population are included in the sample with the same probability.
2.8 Detailed inspection
A comprehensive inspection of the sample.
2.9 General inspection
An inspection of important quality characteristics and tendency problems outside the sample that affect product quality. 2.10 Process inspection
Approved by the National Surveying and Mapping Kitchen on August 25, 1995
http://foodmate.net1995-12-01Implementation
CH 1002—1995
On the basis of self-inspection and mutual inspection of the operating group (personnel), a comprehensive inspection of the products produced by the operating group is carried out in accordance with the corresponding technical standards, technical design documents and relevant technical regulations. 2.11 Final inspection
On the basis of process inspection, the production unit conducts another comprehensive inspection of the products produced by the operating group. 2.12 Acceptance
Inspection to determine whether the inspected batch can be accepted. 3 Basic regulations for inspection and acceptance
3.1 A two-level inspection and one-level acceptance system is implemented for surveying and mapping products. 3.1.1 Surveying and mapping production units implement process inspection and final inspection on product quality. The process inspection is undertaken by the squadron (room, workshop) inspection personnel. Final The inspection shall be carried out by the quality management organization of the production unit. Under the premise of ensuring product quality, the production unit may formulate "Detailed Rules for the Final Inspection Implementation of Surveying and Mapping Products" (the proportion of internal detailed inspection shall not be lower than the provisions of Table 1) in combination with the actual situation of the unit and referring to the quality characteristics of the product, and implement it after approval by the superior competent department. The production unit shall implement the inspection of surveying and mapping products according to the contract or plan. After the final inspection, it shall apply for acceptance in writing to the commissioned production unit or the department that issued the task, and submit the final inspection report.
3.1.2 The acceptance work shall be organized and implemented by the commissioning unit of the task, or entrusted by the unit to an inspection agency with inspection qualifications. The acceptance work shall be carried out after the surveying and mapping product has passed the final inspection. Acceptance form The inspected products shall be inspected in detail according to the relevant contents of this regulation and the proportion not less than that in Table 1, and the rest shall be inspected in general. 3.1.3 Composition of detailed inspection samples. According to the detailed inspection proportion (see Table 1), samples shall be drawn from the inspection batch by random sampling. 3.1.4 Inspection and acceptance work at all levels must be carried out independently and shall not be omitted or replaced. 3.1.5 The work group must conduct self-inspection and mutual inspection of the completed products to eliminate all kinds of defects in the operation process. 3.1.6 The administrative leaders and chief engineers of the production unit must be responsible for the technical design quality of the products of the unit; the inspectors at all levels shall be responsible for the quality of the products they inspect, the upper process shall be responsible for the lower process; the production personnel shall be responsible for the operation quality of the products they complete. 3. 2 Basis for inspection and acceptance
a. Relevant surveying and mapping task book, contract or entrusted inspection and acceptance document, b. Relevant laws and technical standards;
c. Technical design book and relevant technical regulations, etc. 3.3 Handling of products after inspection
3.3.1 When it is found during the inspection that there are products that do not meet the technical standards, technical design books or other relevant technical regulations, timely handling opinions should be put forward and handed over to the inspected unit for correction. When there are many problems or the nature is serious, some or all products can be returned to the inspected unit for re-inspection and processing, and then re-inspection until the inspection is qualified. 3.3.2 For batches that are judged as qualified by acceptance, the inspected unit shall deal with the problems found during the acceptance. For batches that are judged as unqualified by acceptance, the inspection batches shall be returned to the inspected unit in full, and they shall be re-inspected and processed, and then re-apply for acceptance. 3.3.3 When there are differences between the inspection and acceptance personnel and the inspected unit (or personnel) in the handling of quality issues, if it is under inspection, the decision shall be made by the chief engineer of the production unit; if it is under acceptance, the decision shall be made by the superior quality management organization of the production unit. Any differences arising from the entrusted acceptance may be reported to the quality management organization of the surveying and mapping authorities of each province, city, and autonomous region for decision. :3.4 After the final inspection of the product, the production unit shall assess the product quality in accordance with the "Surveying and Mapping Product Quality Assessment Standard" (CH1003--1995), and the acceptance unit shall verify it.
3.5 During the inspection and acceptance, the acceptance personnel shall carefully make inspection and acceptance records, and hand over the records with the product for graded filing. 3.6 After the final inspection and acceptance work is completed, the production unit and the acceptance unit shall prepare the inspection report and acceptance report respectively in accordance with the provisions of Appendix A. After the inspection report is reviewed by the leader of the production unit, it shall be submitted for acceptance together with the product. After the acceptance report is reviewed by the head of the acceptance unit (the acceptance report of the entrusted acceptance is submitted to the leader of the entrusting unit for review), it shall be filed with the product and a copy shall be sent to the production unit. .575
http://foodmate.neProduct Name
Triangulation
Traverse
Leveling
Astronomical Survey
Gravity Survey
Electromagnetic Wave Distance Measurement
GPS Survey
Geodetic Calculation
Image Map
Plank Meter Mapping
Compilation and Drawing of Storage Maps,
Printing Original Maps
Quality Characteristics of Unit Products
4.1 Geodetic Survey
CH 1002—1995
Detailed inspection ratio in surveying and mapping product acceptance
Detailed inspection ratio
Product name
Compilation and drawing of thematic maps
Printing original map
Printed finished product (basic map)
Printed finished product (thematic map)
Aerial photography
Aerial survey field
Aerial survey original map
Image plan
Atlas
Engineering survey
Cadastral survey Drawing
Field inspection of marker stone burial
4.1.1 Quality characteristics of triangulation and traverse measurement products and division of corresponding weights (see Table 2) Table 2
First-level quality characteristics
Construction (burial)
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Reasonableness of the layout of triangulation points (traverse points) and point density 2. Reasonableness of point selection
3. The inverse value of the lock segment figure weight or the size of the traverse tortuosity 1. Reasonableness of the structure of the marker and the relationship between the slot column and the line of sight 2. Type and quality of the marker stone
3. The burial and external decoration of the marker stone
4. The completeness and correctness of the point record
5. The completeness of the trust book
1. The items, methods, accuracy and metrological verification of the instrument inspection2. The leveling joint measurement of the triangulation point (traverse point)Unit
Detailed inspection ratio
2 books/variety
3. The determination method, number of times, time and projection deviation of the centering element, the determination method of the gauge height and the correctness of the measurement position
4. The observation method, time selection, light segment distribution, result selection and re-measurement of the horizontal angle and the celestial distance (or vertical angle)
5.Records and notes in manual notes, various errors in observation, correctness of recording procedures in electronic notebooks and standardization of output formats
1. Completeness of field verification items
2. Correctness of calculation methods
3. Compliance of calculation results with tolerances
4. Completeness of submitted materials
http://foodmate.netCH 1002—1995
4.1.2 Quality characteristics of leveling products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 3) Table 3
First-level quality characteristics
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Reasonableness of leveling route layout and point density 2. Reasonableness of leveling point location selection
3. Correctness of route map drawing
1. Type and quality of marker stones
2. Burial and external decoration of marker stones
3. Completeness and correctness of point record contents
4. Completeness of trusteeship procedures
1. Inspection items, methods, accuracy and completeness of data of instruments and scales, calibration of instruments and scales during operation; metrological verification||tt ||2. Observation methods and time, collection, detection and round-trip measurement, morning and afternoon re-station situation; selection of results and re-measurement situation
3. Records and notes in manual notebooks, various errors in observations, correctness of recording procedures in electronic notebooks and standardization of output formats
4. Correctness of joint measurement and connection methods for existing leveling points and leveling routes 1. Completeness of field verification items
2. Correctness of calculation methods
3. Conformity of calculation results with limit errors
4. Completeness of submitted data
4.1.3 Quality characteristics of astronomical measurement products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 4) Table 4
First-level quality characteristics
Second-level quality characteristics
1. The number, time, results and stability of human-instrument errors 2. The correctness and accuracy of the inspection methods of instruments and timepieces, and the stability of the performance of instruments and meters during field use; metrological verification conditions
3. The selection of observation time for longitude, latitude and azimuth, distribution of light segments and ratio of day and night measurements of azimuth 4. Clarity and completeness of records and notes in observation notebooks, notepads, etc.; Correctness of various calculations in observation and compliance with various errors; Reasonableness of selection of results and re-measurement 5. Correctness of the method for determining the centroid, selection of measurement time and size of projection deviation 1. Completeness of field verification items
2. Correctness of calculation method
3. Compliance of calculation results with limit errors
4. Completeness of submitted materials
http://foodmate.netCH 1002--1995
Division of quality characteristics of gravity measurement products and corresponding rights (see Table 5) 4. 1. 4
First-level quality characteristics
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Reasonableness of selection of gravity control points and encryption points 2. The uniformity of point selection
1. The quality of the marker stone
2. The burial and external decoration of the marker stone
3. The completeness and correctness of the content of the point record and the photo materials1. The rationality of the selection of the gravity baseline; the correctness of the initial data2. The correctness of the method for determining the scale factor (or grid value) of the gravimeter and its accuracyMetrological verification3. The correctness of the method for determining the elevation and plane coordinates of the gravity point and its accuracy4. The rationality of the arrangement of the gravity survey line and the correctness of the joint survey method5. The records and notes of various observation notebooks are clear and complete; the correctness of various calculations in the observation and the conformity of various errors; the rationality of the selection and re-survey of the results1. The completeness of the field verification items
2. The correctness of the calculation method
3. The conformity of the calculation results with the limit error
4. The completeness of the submitted materials Completeness
Division of quality characteristics of electromagnetic wave ranging products and corresponding rights (see Table 6) Table 6
First-level quality characteristics
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Completeness of inspection items for instruments and meters, correctness and accuracy of inspection methods, completeness of data, and metrological verification
2. Selection of observation conditions, rationality of light segment allocation, determination of meteorological elements and their accuracy3. Clarity and completeness of records, number of measurements and compliance with various errors; rationality of selection and re-measurement of results4. Correctness and accuracy of determination method of height difference between two end points of ranging edge5. Correctness of determination method of centering element as well as determination time and projection deviation1. Completeness of field verification items
.2. Correctness of calculation method
3. Compliance of calculation results with limit errors
4. Completeness of submitted data
Note: When considering the selection and embedding of control points, its quality characteristics are the same as the relevant content in 4.1.1. The weight of the first-level quality characteristics is divided as follows: Selection: Construction (Embedding): Observation and Calculation = 0.2 1 0.2 #0. 4 02. GPS measurement product quality characteristics and corresponding weight division (see Table 7) 4.1.6
First-level quality characteristics
1. Rationality of GPS network layout
2. Rationality of point selection
3. Completeness and correctness of the drawing of the ring view
1. Type and quality of the benchmark
2. The embedding and external decoration of the benchmark
3. Completeness and correctness of the content of the point record
Second-level quality characteristics
http://foodmate.netFirst-level quality characteristics
CH 1002—1995
Continued Table 7
Secondary quality characteristics
1. Completeness of inspection items of receiving equipment, meteorological and other instruments, correctness of inspection methods and inspection time, accuracy and integrity of data metrological verification 2. Leveling joint measurement of GPS points
3. Determination of meteorological elements and centering elements and correctness of antenna height measurement 4. Clarity and completeness of records and notes of observers, etc.; rationality of supplementary measurement, re-measurement and data elimination 5. Satellite altitude angle, total number of effective observation satellites, effective observation time of any satellite in a time period, number of observation periods, period length, data sampling interval, quadrant distribution of satellite observation values, PDOP value, etc. 1. Correctness of data processing software and rationality of processing process 2. Completeness of verification items and correctness of calculation methods 3. Compliance of verification results with tolerance limits
4. Completeness of submitted data
Quality characteristics of geodetic calculation products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 8) Table 8
First-level quality characteristics
Selection of mathematical models
Selection of calculation data
Adjustment calculation
Result modulation
4.2 Topographic measurement
4.2.1 Aerial photography
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Correctness of the adopted benchmark and initial data 2. Rationality of the selection of adjustment graphics and data selection 3. Completeness of adjustment scheme, calculation method, and computer program functions 4. Correctness of the selection of instrument constants and verification coefficients 1. Rationality of processing of adjacent survey results
2. Rationality of preparation of various calculation diagrams and tables and correctness of box calculations 3. Correctness of measurement units, decimal selection and rationality of technical problem processing 4. Correctness and accuracy of various calculation results 1. Compilation and transcription of results tables
2. Completeness of technical summary or calculation instructions and accuracy statistics and other poor materials 3. Completeness of submitted materials
4.2.1.1 Classification of quality characteristics of aerial photography products (see Table 9) Table 9
Grade quality characteristics
1. Image weight difference
3. Rotation angle
Flight quality
Image quality
Accessory quality
5. Route curvature
7. Gallery guarantee
9. Film flattening
1. Maximum density
3. Average density
7. Resolution
9. Appearance quality
Secondary quality characteristics
2. Film collar tilt angle
6. Difference between maximum and minimum altitude
8. Maximum exposure time
2. Minimum density
6. Clearness
8. Optical frame image
Completeness and correctness of film index map and aerial identification table579
http://foodmate.net4.2.1.2 Aerial reproduction
CH 1002--1995
The quality characteristics of aerial reproduction are the same as those of image quality in Table 9. 4.2.2. Classification of quality characteristics of aerial survey field work and corresponding rights (see Table 10) Table 10
First-level quality characteristics
Control measurement
Photographic adjustment
4.2.3 Aerial survey internal work
1. Quality of point distribution
2. Mathematical accuracy
3. Instrument calibration and metrological verification
4. Finishing quality
5. Accessory quality
1. Geographical accuracy
2. Finishing quality
4.2.3.1 Classification of quality characteristics of aerial survey original map (see Table 11) Table 11
First-level quality characteristics
1. Planar position accuracy of ground objects
Mathematical accuracy
Geographical accuracy
Finishing quality
Accessory quality
2. Elevation accuracy
3. Mathematical basic accuracy
1. Correctness of each element
2. Coordination of geographical elements
3. Correctness of annotations and symbols
4. Comprehensive selection quality
1. Symbol and line quality
2. Annotation quality
3. Quality of map surface finishing
Quality of handbook and calendar book
Classification of image quality characteristics (see Table 12) Table 12
First-level quality characteristics
1. Planar position accuracy of terrain elements
Mathematical accuracy
Finishing quality
Image quality
Accessory quality
2. Mathematical basic accuracy
Second-level quality characteristics
Second-level quality characteristics
Second-level quality characteristics
3. Image map (orthophoto map, mosaic image map) operation accuracy 1. Annotation quality
2. Quality of external finishing elements
1. Maximum density
2. Minimum density
3. Average density
6. Clarity
7. Resolution
8. Appearance quality
Hand-grade and map quality
http://foodmate.net 4.2.4 Classification of quality characteristics of flatbed mapping products CH 1002—1995
Classification of quality characteristics of flatbed mapping products is the same as Table 11. 4.2.5 Classification of quality characteristics of comprehensive mapping products (see Table 13) Table 13
First-level quality characteristics
Mathematical accuracy
Geographical accuracy
Finishing quality
Image quality
Accessory quality
4. 3 Engineering survey
1. Accuracy of plane position of ground objects
3. Accuracy of mathematical foundation
1. Correctness of each element
3. Correctness of annotations and symbols
1. Quality of symbols and line drawing
3. Quality of finishing elements outside the drawing
1. Maximum density
3. Average density
7. Resolution
Quality of handbooks and map calendars
4.3.1 Quality characteristics of plane control survey products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 14) Table 14
First-level quality characteristics
Selection, construction, burial
Second-level quality characteristics
2. Elevation accuracy
2. Coordination of geographical elements
4. Comprehensive selection quality
2. Marking quality
2. Minimum densitywwW.bzxz.Net
4. Contrast
6. Clarity
8. Appearance quality
Secondary quality characteristics
1. Graphic strength, point density, route layout, rationality of position selection of plane control network 2. Marking specifications and marking quality
3. Specifications and burial considerations of signs and landmarks 4. The completeness and correctness of the content of the point record and the entrusted custody procedures 1. The determination method of the centroid element and the correctness of the projection deviation 2. The inspection of instruments and meters and the correctness of the constant determination; metrological verification 3. The correctness of the implementation of the observation
4. The correctness and completeness of the records and notes of the past 5. The compliance of various errors with the limits
6. The correctness of the verification
.7. The completeness of the data
1. The correctness of the initial data
2. The rationality of the treatment of technical problems
3. The correctness of the adjustment calculation
4. The accuracy of the product
5. The completeness of the data
http://foodmate.net581
CH 1002--1995
4.3.2 Quality characteristics of elevation control measurement products and the division of corresponding rights (see Table 15) Table 15
First-level quality characteristics
Selection and embedding
Second-level quality characteristics
1. The density of points, route layout and rationality of point selection of elevation control network 2. Specifications and embedding quality of signs and markers 3. Completeness and correctness of point record content and indicator piles 1. Correctness of inspection of instruments, meters, scales and constant determination; measurement and determination 2. Correctness of observation implementation
3. Correctness and completeness of records and notes in the notebook 4. Conformity of various errors and tolerances
5. Correctness of verification
6. Completeness of data
1. Correctness of initial data
2. Rationality of handling technical issues
3. Correctness of adjustment calculation
4. Accuracy of product
5. Completeness of data
4.3.3 Division of quality characteristics of line measurement products and corresponding weights (see Table 16) Table 16
First-level quality characteristics
Selection, burial
Second-level quality characteristics
1. 1. The rationality of the layout and location selection of line control points 2. The quality of the buried stones of plane and elevation control points 3. The quality of the buried signs of the starting, ending and turning points of the line 1. The correctness of the joint measurement and surveying of line control points 2. The correctness of the surveying and setting of piles and curves in the line 3. The compliance of various errors with the limit deviation
4. The correctness of the re-survey results of the fixed survey line
5. The correctness of the inspection of instruments, meters and rulers, and the measurement and verification status 6. The correctness of the surveying and setting of the longitudinal and cross-sectional drawings of the line 7. Completeness of data
1. Correctness of initial data
2. Correctness of adjustment calculation
3. Rationality of technical problem handling
4. Completeness of data
http://foodmate.netCH 1002—1995
Division of quality characteristics of construction survey products and corresponding rights (see Table 17) Table 17
First-level quality characteristics
Selection and management
1. Rationality of construction control network layout
2. Buried quality of stakes
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Correctness of inspection and constant determination of instruments, meters, and rulers; metrological verification 2. Correctness of observation implementation
3. Correctness and completeness of the records and notes in the notebook 4. Conformity of various errors and tolerances
5. Correctness of verification
6. Completeness of data
1. Correctness of initial data
2. Rationality of technical problem handling
3. Correctness of adjustment calculation
4. Completeness of data
4.3.5 Quality characteristics of pipeline measurement products and division of corresponding weights (see Table 18) Table 18·
First-level quality characteristics
1. Completeness of original data
Second-level quality characteristics
2. Correctness and completeness of survey and mapping sketches 3. Completeness of filling in the survey form
1. Correctness of inspection and constant determination of instruments, meters, and rulers; metrological verification 2. Rationality of selection of underground pipelines
3. Conformity of various errors and tolerances
4. Accuracy of pipeline point location selection
5. Correctness of pipeline point measurement
6. Quality of on-site sketch drawing
1. Correctness of pipeline point coordinate display
2. Correctness of pipeline map drawing
3. Correctness and completeness of various annotations
4. Completeness of work instructions
5. Completeness of various materials
http://foodmate.net583
CH 1002—1995
Quality characteristics of deformation measurement products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 19) Table 19
-Grade quality characteristics
Selection and burial
4.4 Cadastral surveying
1. Reasonableness of benchmark point location selection
2. The quality of the buried benchmark
3. The correctness of the location selection of the observation point
Secondary quality characteristics
1.Inspection of instruments, meters, and rulers and correctness of constant determination; metrological verification status 2. Rationality of accuracy grade selection
3. Rationality of deformation observation period selection
4. Correctness and completeness of records and notes in the notebook 5. Conformity of various errors with limit deviations
6. Completeness of data
1. Correctness of statistical methods in data processing 2. Rationality of technical problem handling
3. Completeness of data
4.4.1 Quality characteristics of cadastral control survey products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 20) Table 20
First-level quality characteristics
Selection, construction, burial
Second-level quality characteristics
1. Rationality of control network layout and point selection (including protection points) 2. Completeness and correctness of point record content
3. Marking specifications and burial quality
1. Instrument calibration and metrological verification
2. Correctness and completeness of records and notes in the notebook 3. Compliance of various observation errors and tolerances 4. Observation accuracy
5. Finishing and completeness of data
1. 1. Correctness of the initial data
2. Rationality of the handling of technical problems
3. Correctness of the adjustment calculation
4. Accuracy of the product
5. Completeness of the submitted data
2 Quality characteristics of cadastral element measurement products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 21) Table 21
First-level quality characteristics
Boundary point measurement
1. Correctness of the measurement method
2. Rationality of the selection of accuracy level
3. Conformity of various errors and tolerances
4. Reliability of the results
5. Correctness of the measurement sketch drawing
6. Accuracy and completeness of various data
7. Correctness of boundary point numbering
Secondary quality characteristics
http://foodmate.netSecondary quality characteristics
Measurement of building corner points
Area calculation
CH 1002—1995
Continued Table 21
Secondary quality characteristics
1. Correctness of measurement method
2. Rationality of accuracy level selection
3. Conformity of various errors and tolerances
4. Reliability of results
5. Correctness of measurement sketch drawing
6. Accuracy and completeness of various data
7. Correctness of numbering
1. Correctness of measurement method
2. Measurement accuracy
3. Reliability of measurement results
4. Accuracy and completeness of data in the measurement table 4.4.3 Quality characteristics of cadastral books and division of corresponding rights (see Table 22) Table 22
First-level quality characteristics
Land element survey form
Cadastral book
1. Correctness of survey content
2. Completeness of survey content
3. Reliability of survey content
4. Correctness of plot numbering
Second-level quality characteristics
5. Clarity and regularity of survey content 1. Correctness of content
2. Completeness of content
3. Reliability of content
4. Clarity of content filling and regularity of binding 4.4.4 Quality characteristics of cadastral map products and division of corresponding rights (see Table 23) Table 23
First-level quality characteristics
Mathematical accuracy
Geographical accuracy
Finishing accuracy
1. Exhibition point accuracy
2. Difference between the side length of the map gallery and the theoretical value
3. Difference between the kilometer network point and the theoretical value
4. Difference between the diagonal line of the map and the theoretical value
5. The two diagonals are poor
! 6. Plane position accuracy of boundary points and lines
7. Plane position accuracy of buildings
1. Correctness and completeness of cadastral element representation2. Map edge connection
1. Map finishing
2. Map gallery and map curtain external finishing and annotationSecondary quality characteristics
http://foodmate.net585
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.