GB/T 33990-2017 Quality Inspection and Acceptance of Digital Moon Maps GB/T33990-2017 |tt||Standard compression package decompression password: www.bzxz.net
This standard specifies the basic requirements, implementation process and quality assessment methods for the inspection and acceptance of digital moon map products.  This standard applies to the quality inspection and acceptance of digital moon map products.

ICS07.040
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
GB/T33990—2017
Inspection and acceptance for lunar digital map quality
Inspection and acceptance for lunar digital map quality2017-07-12Issued
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of ChinaStandardization Administration of the People's Republic of China
2018-02-01Implementation
2 Terms and definitions
3 Basic requirements for inspection and acceptance
3.1 Materials submitted for inspection and acceptance
3.2 Basis for inspection and acceptance
Second-level inspection and first-level acceptance system
Implementation of inspection and acceptance work
Process inspection
Final inspection
5 Contents and requirements of quality inspection
Quality element Elements and quality sub-elements
Inspection items
6 Quality assessment
Inspection item classification
6.2 Unit achievement quality assessment
6.3 Overall achievement quality assessment
Appendix A (Informative Appendix)
Appendix B (Informative Appendix)
Appendix C (Normative Appendix)
References
Quality inspection/acceptance report format for lunar digital maps
Quality inspection form for lunar digital maps
Inspection item requirements
GB/T33990—2017
Hii KAoNhi KAca
HiiKAoNiKAca
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T1.1-2009. This standard was proposed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
This standard is under the jurisdiction of the National Technical Committee for Standardization of Space Science and Its Applications (SAC/TC312). The drafting unit of this standard is the National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. GB/T33990—2017
The main drafters of this standard are Ren Xin, Liu Jianjun, Li Chunlai, Mou Lingli, Zhang Xiaoxia, Yan Wei, Wang Fenfei, Wang Wenrui, and Chen Wangli. m
Hii KAoNhi KAca
HiiKAoNhiKAca
1 Scope
Quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital maps GB/T33990—2017
This standard specifies the basic requirements, implementation process and quality assessment methods for the inspection and acceptance of lunar digital map products. This standard applies to the quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital map products. 2 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this document. 2.1
lunardigital map
Lunar digital map
A collection of lunar map data with certain coordinates and attributes in a certain coordinate system, stored in digital form on media such as magnetic tapes, disks, and optical disks.
Note: The lunar digital maps applicable to this standard include three types: lunar digital mosaic images, lunar digital orthophotos, and lunar digital elevation models. 2.2
result
A collection of lunar digital map products produced by the producer according to the requirements of the client. 2.3
unit item
The basic unit divided for inspection and acceptance. Note 1: It is advisable to use "sheets" as the unit. With the approval of the production client, the unit results can be divided into regions or lunar digital map types. Note 2: Rewrite GB/T18316-2008, definition 2.1. 2.4
Quality element qualityelement
Describes the quantitative and qualitative components of quality. That is, the basic characteristics of the results to meet the specified requirements and use purposes. Note: The applicability of quality elements depends on the content of the results and their results specifications. Not all quality elements are applicable to all results [GB/T18316 --2008 Definition 2.4
Quality subelement qualitysubelement
Component of a quality element, describing a specific aspect of a quality element. [GB/T18316—2008, Definition 2.5]］2.6
Inspectedentry
Inspection content of a quality subelement. Describes the smallest unit of quality, the smallest implementation object of quality inspection and assessment. [GB/T18316—2008, Definition 2.6
Detailed inspection all entryinspection
Inspection of all inspection items of unit achievement quality requirements. [GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.7]
HiKAoNhi KAca
GB/T33990—2017
Specific entry inspection Inspection of specific inspection items of unit achievement quality requirements. Note: Specific inspection items generally refer to important and special quality requirements or indicators, or inspection items with systematic deviations or errors. [GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.8]］2.9
sample
A collection of unit achievements extracted from all achievements for assessing the quality of the lunar digital map. Note: Rewrite GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.9.2.10
tsample size
sample size
the number of unit results in the sample.
[GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.10]2.11
sampling inspectionsamplinginspection
detailed inspection of samples drawn from all results according to the sampling plan. Note: rewrite GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.12.2.12
metadata
metadata
data about data. That is, the identification, coverage, quality, spatial and temporal patterns, spatial reference system and distribution of the data. [[GB/T19710—2005, definition 4.5]2.13
important inspection itemsimportantinspectedentryInspection items that have a significant impact on the quality or use of the product. Note: If the important inspection items of the product do not meet the requirements, the product must be re-produced and processed before it can be used correctly. 2.14
General inspected itemsGeneral inspected entriesInspection items that have little or no impact on the quality or use of the product. Note: General inspection items of the product do not meet the requirements, which have little or no impact on the use of the product. The impact can be eliminated by manually modifying the product or other alternative methods.
3 Basic requirements for inspection and acceptance
3.1 Materials submitted for inspection and acceptance
3.1.1 The main materials submitted for inspection include: result data files;
b) metadata files and ancillary files;
inspection drawings of data output.
3.1.2 The main materials submitted for acceptance include: result data files;
metadata files and ancillary files;
inspection drawings of data output;
inspection records and inspection reports.
HiiKAoNniKAca
3.2 Basis for inspection and acceptance
The basis for inspection and acceptance includes:
GB/T33990—2017
a) Extracts of relevant data production contracts and task books on product quality characteristics or entrusted inspection and acceptance documents: b) Technical requirements (including technical standards, technical design documents and relevant technical regulations). 3.3 Two-level inspection and one-level acceptance system
3.3.1 The results of the lunar digital map products should pass the process inspection of the production party's operating department, the final inspection of the production party's quality supervision department and the acceptance of the production entrusting party in turn. Figure 1 is the quality inspection and acceptance flow chart of the lunar digital map. 3.3.2 If the information is incomplete or the data is incomplete, the department responsible for inspection or acceptance has the right to refuse inspection and acceptance. Start
Process inspection
Inspect the units with problems
Results returned for modification
Have all the unit results
passed the process inspection?
Submit final review
Application for final review
Final review
Inspect problematic units
Results returned for revisionwwW.bzxz.Net
Have all unit results
passed the final review?
Submit for acceptance
Are the results accepted?
Figure 1 Flow chart of quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital map Implementation of inspection and acceptance work
4.1 Process inspection
4.1.1 The process inspection of the lunar digital map product shall be carried out in detail for all unit results. 4.1.2 Problems, errors and results in the process inspection shall be recorded in the inspection record. Hong Kong
Units that fail the inspection
Results shall be returned for modification
4.1.3 Errors in the process inspection shall be modified and reviewed until all unit results are inspected and found to be correct, and then they can be submitted for final inspection.
4.2 Final inspection
4.2.1 Unit results that pass the process inspection may be subject to final inspection. 3
HiKAoNhiKAca
GB/T33990—2017
4.2.2 The final inspection shall be carried out in detail for all unit results. 4.2.3 Problems found in the final inspection shall be recorded in the inspection record. 4.2.4 The process inspection record shall be submitted for the final inspection. 4.2.5 Unit results with errors in the final inspection shall be returned for modification, and the final inspection shall be carried out after the process inspection is correct until the inspection is correct. 4.2.6
All unit results can be submitted for acceptance after the final inspection is correct. 4.2.7
After the final inspection is completed, an inspection report should be written. After the final inspection is completed, a written application for acceptance should be made. 4.2.8
4.3 Acceptance
Unit results can be accepted after all have passed the final inspection. Acceptance adopts sampling inspection.
Unit results selected as samples in the acceptance shall be checked in detail one by one, and unit results outside the sample shall be checked as needed. Problems, errors and results of the acceptance inspection shall be recorded in the inspection record. The final inspection record shall be reviewed during the acceptance.
Unit results that fail the acceptance shall be returned for processing and resubmitted for acceptance. When re-accepting, re-sampling shall be carried out. Unit results that pass the acceptance shall be corrected for errors found in the inspection and verified through re-inspection. After the acceptance is completed, an acceptance report should be prepared. The format of the lunar mathematical map quality inspection and acceptance report can be found in Appendix A and Appendix B. The acceptance work procedures are as follows:
Determine the sample size. The sample size is drawn according to 15% of the number of unit results. When the number of unit results is less than or equal to 20, at least 3 samples should be drawn.
Draw samples. According to the sample size specified in 4.3.9a), use simple random sampling to draw samples. b)
Inspect. Conduct a detailed inspection of the samples, and conduct a general inspection of the products outside the samples as needed. d) Unit result quality assessment. Conduct a unit product quality assessment in accordance with the provisions of 6.2. Quality assessment of all product results. Conduct a quality assessment of all product results in accordance with the provisions of 6.3. e
Prepare an acceptance report. After the acceptance is completed, refer to the contents of Appendix A to prepare an acceptance report. f)
5 Quality inspection content and requirements
5.1 Quality elements and quality sub-elements
The quality elements and quality sub-elements of the lunar digital map are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Quality elements and quality sub-elements
Quality elements
Basic requirements
Spatial reference system
Position accuracy
Quality sub-elements
Format standardization
Geoditism
Elevation datum
Map projection
Plane accuracy
Elevation accuracy
Mosaic accuracy
Correctness of file naming and file format Correctness of geodetic datum use
Correctness of elevation datum use
Correctness of map projection parameters use
Closeness of plane coordinate values ​​to true values
Closeness of elevation values ​​or elevation attributes to true values ​​Description of position deviation of overlapping areas of adjacent maps|| tt||Quality elements
Image/raster quality
Attachment quality
5.2 Inspection items
Quality sub-elements
Resolution
Grid parameters
Image characteristics
Landform expression
Metadata
Attached documents
Table 1 (continued)
Correctness of image resolution
Correctness of grid parameters
Degree of conformity of image characteristics with requirements
Degree of conformity of landforms with requirements
Integrity and correctness of metadata
Description of correctness and completeness of various attached documents
The inspection items and inspection requirements for quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital maps are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Check items
Quality sub-elements
Format standardization
Geodittan
Elevation datum
Map projection
Plane accuracy
Elevation accuracy
Mosaic accuracy
Resolution
Check items
File naming
File format
Data file
Coordinate system
Elevation datum
Projection parameters
Frame range
Plane position
Medium error
Medium error
Plane edge
Medium error
Elevation edge
Medium error
Inlay line
Resolution
Inspection requirements
Check whether the file naming complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. Check whether the file storage format complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. Check whether the data Missing, redundant, whether it can be read correctly Check whether the coordinate system complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements Check whether the elevation datum complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements Check whether the use of projection parameters complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements GB/T33990—2017
Applicable results
All results
All results
Moon digital
Elevation model
Check whether the range of the map sheet division method complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements Check whether the plane accuracy complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.1 in Appendix C
Check whether the elevation accuracy complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.2
Calculate the mean error of the plane position at the junction to see if it complies with the requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.3 Calculate the mean error of the elevation at the junction to see if it complies with the requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.4 Check whether the mosaic lines of adjacent map data products have consistent tones on both sides, whether the same lunar surface entities are misplaced, and whether they comply with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. Check whether the image resolution complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. All results
Lunar digital
Elevation model
All results
Lunar digital
Elevation model
All results
Lunar digital
Mosaic image
Map, lunar digital
Digital orthophoto
GB/T33990—2017
Quality sub-elements
Grid parameters
Image characteristics
Landform expression
Metadata
Supplementary documents
Quality assessment
Inspection items
Grid size
Clarity
Image content errors
Topography
Conformity
Completeness
Correctness
Completeness
Correctness
Inspection item classification
Table 2 (continued)
Inspection requirements
Check whether the grid size meets the requirements
Check whether the map color is uniform
Check whether the image clarity meets the requirements
Check whether the image has noise, holes, image distortion, distortion and other image data errors, and count the number of errors
Check conformity with known topography data Check whether the metadata is complete and has no omissions Check whether the metadata is written in the format specified in the contract, task book or technical requirements, and whether the content is correct
Check whether the attached documents are complete and have no omissions Check whether the content of the attached documents is correct and whether it complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements
For the importance level of the inspection items, see Table 3. Table 3 Inspection item classification
Quality sub-elements
Format standardization
Geod datum
Elevation datum
Map projection
Plane accuracy
Elevation accuracy
Inspection items
File naming
File format
Data file
Coordinate system
Elevation datum
Projection parameters
Frame range
Plane position
Mean error
Mean error in elevation
Key level
General inspection items
General inspection items
Important inspection items
Important inspection items
Important inspection items
Important inspection items
Important inspection items
Important inspection items
Applicable results
Lunar digital
Elevation model
Lunar digital
Mosaic image
Map, lunar digital
Character orthophoto
Lunar digital
Elevation model
All results
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.