Standard ICS number:Mathematics, Natural Sciences >> 07.040 Astronomy, Geodesy, Geography
Standard Classification Number:Comprehensive>>Basic Subjects>>A46 Astronomy
associated standards
Publication information
publishing house:China Standards Press
Publication date:2017-07-25
other information
drafter:Ren Xin, Liu Jianjun, Li Chunlai, Mou Lingli, Zhang Xiaoxia, Yan Wei, Wang Fenfei, Wang Wenrui, Chen Wangli
Drafting unit:National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Focal point unit:National Technical Committee on Space Science and Its Applications Standardization (SAC/TC 312)
Proposing unit:Chinese Academy of Sciences
Publishing department:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China Standardization Administration of China
competent authority:National Technical Committee on Space Science and Its Applications Standardization (SAC/TC 312)
GB/T 33990-2017 Quality Inspection and Acceptance of Digital Moon Maps
GB/T33990-2017
|tt||Standard compression package decompression password: www.bzxz.net
This standard specifies the basic requirements, implementation process and quality assessment methods for the inspection and acceptance of digital moon map products. This standard applies to the quality inspection and acceptance of digital moon map products.
Some standard content:
ICS07.040 National Standard of the People's Republic of China GB/T33990—2017 Inspection and acceptance for lunar digital map quality Inspection and acceptance for lunar digital map quality2017-07-12Issued General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of ChinaStandardization Administration of the People's Republic of China 2018-02-01Implementation 2 Terms and definitions 3 Basic requirements for inspection and acceptance 3.1 Materials submitted for inspection and acceptance 3.2 Basis for inspection and acceptance Second-level inspection and first-level acceptance system Implementation of inspection and acceptance work Process inspection Final inspection 5 Contents and requirements of quality inspectionwwW.bzxz.Net Quality element Elements and quality sub-elements Inspection items 6 Quality assessment Inspection item classification 6.2 Unit achievement quality assessment 6.3 Overall achievement quality assessment Appendix A (Informative Appendix) Appendix B (Informative Appendix) Appendix C (Normative Appendix) References Quality inspection/acceptance report format for lunar digital maps Quality inspection form for lunar digital maps Inspection item requirements GB/T33990—2017 Hii KAoNhi KAca HiiKAoNiKAca This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T1.1-2009. This standard was proposed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This standard is under the jurisdiction of the National Technical Committee for Standardization of Space Science and Its Applications (SAC/TC312). The drafting unit of this standard is the National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. GB/T33990—2017 The main drafters of this standard are Ren Xin, Liu Jianjun, Li Chunlai, Mou Lingli, Zhang Xiaoxia, Yan Wei, Wang Fenfei, Wang Wenrui, and Chen Wangli. m Hii KAoNhi KAca HiiKAoNhiKAca 1 Scope Quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital maps GB/T33990—2017 This standard specifies the basic requirements, implementation process and quality assessment methods for the inspection and acceptance of lunar digital map products. This standard applies to the quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital map products. 2 Terms and definitions The following terms and definitions apply to this document. 2.1 lunardigital map Lunar digital map A collection of lunar map data with certain coordinates and attributes in a certain coordinate system, stored in digital form on media such as magnetic tapes, disks, and optical disks. Note: The lunar digital maps applicable to this standard include three types: lunar digital mosaic images, lunar digital orthophotos, and lunar digital elevation models. 2.2 result A collection of lunar digital map products produced by the producer according to the requirements of the client. 2.3 unit item The basic unit divided for inspection and acceptance. Note 1: It is advisable to use "sheets" as the unit. With the approval of the production client, the unit results can be divided into regions or lunar digital map types. Note 2: Rewrite GB/T18316-2008, definition 2.1. 2.4 Quality element qualityelement Describes the quantitative and qualitative components of quality. That is, the basic characteristics of the results to meet the specified requirements and use purposes. Note: The applicability of quality elements depends on the content of the results and their results specifications. Not all quality elements are applicable to all results [GB/T18316 --2008 Definition 2.4 Quality subelement qualitysubelement Component of a quality element, describing a specific aspect of a quality element. [GB/T18316—2008, Definition 2.5]]2.6 Inspectedentry Inspection content of a quality subelement. Describes the smallest unit of quality, the smallest implementation object of quality inspection and assessment. [GB/T18316—2008, Definition 2.6 Detailed inspection all entryinspection Inspection of all inspection items of unit achievement quality requirements. [GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.7] HiKAoNhi KAca GB/T33990—2017 Specific entry inspection Inspection of specific inspection items of unit achievement quality requirements. Note: Specific inspection items generally refer to important and special quality requirements or indicators, or inspection items with systematic deviations or errors. [GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.8]]2.9 sample A collection of unit achievements extracted from all achievements for assessing the quality of the lunar digital map. Note: Rewrite GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.9.2.10 tsample size sample size the number of unit results in the sample. [GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.10]2.11 sampling inspectionsamplinginspection detailed inspection of samples drawn from all results according to the sampling plan. Note: rewrite GB/T18316—2008, definition 2.12.2.12 metadata metadata data about data. That is, the identification, coverage, quality, spatial and temporal patterns, spatial reference system and distribution of the data. [[GB/T19710—2005, definition 4.5]2.13 important inspection itemsimportantinspectedentryInspection items that have a significant impact on the quality or use of the product. Note: If the important inspection items of the product do not meet the requirements, the product must be re-produced and processed before it can be used correctly. 2.14 General inspected itemsGeneral inspected entriesInspection items that have little or no impact on the quality or use of the product. Note: General inspection items of the product do not meet the requirements, which have little or no impact on the use of the product. The impact can be eliminated by manually modifying the product or other alternative methods. 3 Basic requirements for inspection and acceptance 3.1 Materials submitted for inspection and acceptance 3.1.1 The main materials submitted for inspection include: result data files; b) metadata files and ancillary files; inspection drawings of data output. 3.1.2 The main materials submitted for acceptance include: result data files; metadata files and ancillary files; inspection drawings of data output; inspection records and inspection reports. HiiKAoNniKAca 3.2 Basis for inspection and acceptance The basis for inspection and acceptance includes: GB/T33990—2017 a) Extracts of relevant data production contracts and task books on product quality characteristics or entrusted inspection and acceptance documents: b) Technical requirements (including technical standards, technical design documents and relevant technical regulations). 3.3 Two-level inspection and one-level acceptance system 3.3.1 The results of the lunar digital map products should pass the process inspection of the production party's operating department, the final inspection of the production party's quality supervision department and the acceptance of the production entrusting party in turn. Figure 1 is the quality inspection and acceptance flow chart of the lunar digital map. 3.3.2 If the information is incomplete or the data is incomplete, the department responsible for inspection or acceptance has the right to refuse inspection and acceptance. Start Process inspection Inspect the units with problems Results returned for modification Have all the unit results passed the process inspection? Submit final review Application for final review Final review Inspect problematic units Results returned for revision Have all unit results passed the final review? Submit for acceptance Are the results accepted? Figure 1 Flow chart of quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital map Implementation of inspection and acceptance work 4.1 Process inspection 4.1.1 The process inspection of the lunar digital map product shall be carried out in detail for all unit results. 4.1.2 Problems, errors and results in the process inspection shall be recorded in the inspection record. Hong Kong Units that fail the inspection Results shall be returned for modification 4.1.3 Errors in the process inspection shall be modified and reviewed until all unit results are inspected and found to be correct, and then they can be submitted for final inspection. 4.2 Final inspection 4.2.1 Unit results that pass the process inspection may be subject to final inspection. 3 HiKAoNhiKAca GB/T33990—2017 4.2.2 The final inspection shall be carried out in detail for all unit results. 4.2.3 Problems found in the final inspection shall be recorded in the inspection record. 4.2.4 The process inspection record shall be submitted for the final inspection. 4.2.5 Unit results with errors in the final inspection shall be returned for modification, and the final inspection shall be carried out after the process inspection is correct until the inspection is correct. 4.2.6 All unit results can be submitted for acceptance after the final inspection is correct. 4.2.7 After the final inspection is completed, an inspection report should be written. After the final inspection is completed, a written application for acceptance should be made. 4.2.8 4.3 Acceptance Unit results can be accepted after all have passed the final inspection. Acceptance adopts sampling inspection. Unit results selected as samples in the acceptance shall be checked in detail one by one, and unit results outside the sample shall be checked as needed. Problems, errors and results of the acceptance inspection shall be recorded in the inspection record. The final inspection record shall be reviewed during the acceptance. Unit results that fail the acceptance shall be returned for processing and resubmitted for acceptance. When re-accepting, re-sampling shall be carried out. Unit results that pass the acceptance shall be corrected for errors found in the inspection and verified through re-inspection. After the acceptance is completed, an acceptance report should be prepared. The format of the lunar mathematical map quality inspection and acceptance report can be found in Appendix A and Appendix B. The acceptance work procedures are as follows: Determine the sample size. The sample size is drawn according to 15% of the number of unit results. When the number of unit results is less than or equal to 20, at least 3 samples should be drawn. Draw samples. According to the sample size specified in 4.3.9a), use simple random sampling to draw samples. b) Inspect. Conduct a detailed inspection of the samples, and conduct a general inspection of the products outside the samples as needed. d) Unit result quality assessment. Conduct a unit product quality assessment in accordance with the provisions of 6.2. Quality assessment of all product results. Conduct a quality assessment of all product results in accordance with the provisions of 6.3. e Prepare an acceptance report. After the acceptance is completed, refer to the contents of Appendix A to prepare an acceptance report. f) 5 Quality inspection content and requirements 5.1 Quality elements and quality sub-elements The quality elements and quality sub-elements of the lunar digital map are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Quality elements and quality sub-elements Quality elements Basic requirements Spatial reference system Position accuracy Quality sub-elements Format standardization Geoditism Elevation datum Map projection Plane accuracy Elevation accuracy Mosaic accuracy Correctness of file naming and file format Correctness of geodetic datum use Correctness of elevation datum use Correctness of map projection parameters use Closeness of plane coordinate values to true values Closeness of elevation values or elevation attributes to true values Description of position deviation of overlapping areas of adjacent maps|| tt||Quality elements Image/raster quality Attachment quality 5.2 Inspection items Quality sub-elements Resolution Grid parameters Image characteristics Landform expression Metadata Attached documents Table 1 (continued) Correctness of image resolution Correctness of grid parameters Degree of conformity of image characteristics with requirements Degree of conformity of landforms with requirements Integrity and correctness of metadata Description of correctness and completeness of various attached documents The inspection items and inspection requirements for quality inspection and acceptance of lunar digital maps are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Check items Quality sub-elements Format standardization Geodittan Elevation datum Map projection Plane accuracy Elevation accuracy Mosaic accuracy Resolution Check items File naming File format Data file Coordinate system Elevation datum Projection parameters Frame range Plane position Medium error Medium error Plane edge Medium error Elevation edge Medium error Inlay line Resolution Inspection requirements Check whether the file naming complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. Check whether the file storage format complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. Check whether the data Missing, redundant, whether it can be read correctly Check whether the coordinate system complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements Check whether the elevation datum complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements Check whether the use of projection parameters complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements GB/T33990—2017 Applicable results All results All results Moon digital Elevation model Check whether the range of the map sheet division method complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements Check whether the plane accuracy complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.1 in Appendix C Check whether the elevation accuracy complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.2 Calculate the mean error of the plane position at the junction to see if it complies with the requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.3 Calculate the mean error of the elevation at the junction to see if it complies with the requirements. For specific calculation methods, see C.4 Check whether the mosaic lines of adjacent map data products have consistent tones on both sides, whether the same lunar surface entities are misplaced, and whether they comply with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. Check whether the image resolution complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements. All results Lunar digital Elevation model All results Lunar digital Elevation model All results Lunar digital Mosaic image Map, lunar digital Digital orthophoto GB/T33990—2017 Quality sub-elements Grid parameters Image characteristics Landform expression Metadata Supplementary documents Quality assessment Inspection items Grid size Clarity Image content errors Topography Conformity Completeness Correctness Completeness Correctness Inspection item classification Table 2 (continued) Inspection requirements Check whether the grid size meets the requirements Check whether the map color is uniform Check whether the image clarity meets the requirements Check whether the image has noise, holes, image distortion, distortion and other image data errors, and count the number of errors Check conformity with known topography data Check whether the metadata is complete and has no omissions Check whether the metadata is written in the format specified in the contract, task book or technical requirements, and whether the content is correct Check whether the attached documents are complete and have no omissions Check whether the content of the attached documents is correct and whether it complies with the provisions of the contract, task book or technical requirements For the importance level of the inspection items, see Table 3. Table 3 Inspection item classification Quality sub-elements Format standardization Geod datum Elevation datum Map projection Plane accuracy Elevation accuracy Inspection items File naming File format Data file Coordinate system Elevation datum Projection parameters Frame range Plane position Mean error Mean error in elevation Key level General inspection items General inspection items Important inspection items Important inspection items Important inspection items Important inspection items Important inspection items Important inspection items Applicable results Lunar digital Elevation model Lunar digital Mosaic image Map, lunar digital Character orthophoto Lunar digital Elevation model All results Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.