This standard specifies the general technical requirements, test methods and inspection rules for anti-theft security doors, and is the technical basis for the design, manufacture and acceptance of anti-theft security doors. This standard applies to anti-theft security doors used in residential buildings and other civil buildings. GB 17565-1998 General Technical Requirements for Anti-theft Security Doors GB17565-1998 Standard Download Decompression Password: www.bzxz.net

GB17565-1998
This standard is revised from the original industry standard GA25-92 "General Technical Conditions for Anti-theft Security Doors" based on the experience summary of the production, use, testing, market sales, cost analysis, case analysis, etc. of anti-theft security doors. This standard makes some adjustments to the anti-destruction ability of fence-type anti-theft security doors on the basis of GA25-92, appropriately reduces the net working time of anti-destruction, and clearly puts forward relatively intuitive technical indicators in structure and size. In view of the fact that GA/T73-1994 "Mechanical Anti-theft Locks" had not been released when the original industry standard GA2592 was approved and issued, GA/T73--1994 was cited when this standard was formulated, stipulating that the anti-theft locks installed and used on anti-theft security doors should comply with the requirements in GA/T73-1994, so that the locks are significantly better than civilian locks in quality. This standard reduces the requirements for the alarm device in GA25-92 to only the requirements for function and power supply. This standard was proposed by the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China. This standard is under the jurisdiction of the National Security Alarm System Standardization Technical Committee. This standard was drafted by the Security and Police Electronic Products Quality Inspection Center of the Ministry of Public Security. The main drafter of this standard is Hao Wenqi.
1 Scope
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
General Technical Conditions for Burglar Resistant Safety Doors
General Specification for Burglary Resistant Safety DoorsGB17565—1998
This standard specifies the general technical requirements, test methods and inspection rules for burglary resistant safety doors, and is the technical basis for the design, manufacture and acceptance of burglary resistant safety doors.
This standard applies to burglary resistant safety doors used in residential buildings and other civil buildings. 2 Referenced Standards
The provisions contained in the following standards constitute the provisions of this standard through reference in this standard. When this standard is published, the versions shown are valid. All standards will be revised, and parties using this standard should explore the possibility of using the latest versions of the following standards. GB/T5824—1986 Size series of building doors and windows GB10408.1—1989 General technical conditions for intrusion detectors GA/T73—1994 Mechanical anti-theft locks
3 Terms
This standard adopts the following definitions.
3.1 Burglar resistant safety door A door with a special lock and anti-theft device that can resist abnormal opening under certain conditions for a certain period of time. 3.2 Safety class
The length of net working time that the weakest link of the burglary resistant safety door can resist abnormal opening under certain conditions under the action of specified destructive tools. 3.3 Flush door
A single door with an integral structure and hinges installed on the side of the door, which opens inward or outward. 3.4 Folding door
A door with multiple leaves (roots). Including sliding gate type and multi-leaf hinged folding door. 3.5 Fence door
A door with multiple fixed bars. 3.6 Time lock
An automatic lock whose opening time can be controlled. 3.7 Double faced lock
A special lock with inner and outer lock heads.
3.8 Special lock
A lock whose lock core is obviously different from the single-row pin structure and cannot be opened by foreign objects within 1 minute by professional technicians. 3.9 Burglar resistant lock A special lock whose main lock tongue is in a self-locking state when the door is closed. 3.10 Common machine hand tools Approved by the State Administration of Quality and Technical Supervision on November 17, 1998 and implemented on December 1, 1999
GB 17565-1998
Common machine hand tools include chisels, files, wedges, pliers, screwdrivers, spanners, hacksaws, large iron shears with a length not exceeding 600mm, 1.2kg hand hammers, portable hand drills, crowbars and prying tools of various shapes with a length not exceeding 600mm and a diameter not exceeding 50mm.
3.11 Portable electric tools Portable electric tools include electric hand drills with a drill bit diameter not exceeding 12.5mm and portable electric hammers or pneumatic hammers with a punch diameter not exceeding 25mm.
3.12615 cm2 opening615 cm2opening A rectangular opening with a minimum side length of 152 mm, or a circular opening with a diameter of 281 mm, or an isosceles right triangle with a hypotenuse of 497 mm.
3.13 Door testing equipmentdoor testing equipment A test equipment that can install and fix anti-theft security doors. The equipment can meet the requirements of destructive tests and operational function tests of anti-theft security doors in terms of rigidity and strength. The equipment should be able to install anti-theft security doors of various sizes, and the suspended crossbeam should be able to move up and down and left and right.
4 Product classification and marking
4.1 Anti-theft security door products are classified according to their security level, structural type, and door leaf closing direction, and corresponding markings and codes are given. 4.2 The mark of anti-theft security door products is FAM. 4.3 The security levels of anti-theft security door products are divided into three levels: A and BC. 4.4 The anti-theft safety door products are classified according to their structural type (door type) as follows: a) Fully enclosed swing door, represented by P;
b) Fence-type swing door, represented by S;
c) Fence-type folding door, represented by Z.
4.5 The anti-theft safety door products use the following codes according to the direction of their door leaf closing: Door leaf closing direction code
Door leaf clockwise
Close from inside to outside
Door leaf clockwise
Close from outside to inside
Door leaf counterclockwise
Close from inside to outside
Door leaf counterclockwise
Close from outside to inside
4.6 Order of product marking codes
Safety door
A or B or C| |tt||P or S or z
5.0 or 6.0
5.1 or 6.1
Door leaf closing
Closing direction
Example (1):
FAM-BP-5.0
FAM: Anti-theft safety door code
B: Safety level is B
P: Fully enclosed swing door
5.0: Door closes clockwise from inside to outside
5 Technical requirements
5.1 General requirements
GB 17565--1998
Example (2):
FAM-AS-6. 1
FAM: Code for anti-theft security door
A: Security level is A
S: Fence-type swing door
6.1: The door closes from the outside to the inside in a counterclockwise direction
5.1.1 The surface of all metal and wooden components shall be treated for corrosion protection, and the paint layer shall have an anti-rust primer. The paint layer surface shall be free of bubbles and paint residues, the electroplating layer shall have a uniform color, and the plating layer shall not fall off. 5.1.2 The external dimensions of the door leaf and door frame shall comply with the relevant provisions of GB/T5824 and the requirements of the illustrated dimensions, and the cross-sectional structure of the door leaf shall comply with the requirements of the drawings.
5.1.3 High-strength rivets shall be used for the riveting of fence-type folding doors, and the riveting quality shall ensure that there is no obvious deviation of the rivet center line. 5.1.4 At the lock installation location, with the lock hole as the center, there should be a reinforced anti-drilling steel plate within a radius of not less than 100mm to prevent the door leaf from being penetrated through a hole, thereby removing the lock and opening the door leaf. 5.2 Security level
The anti-theft security doors of various structural forms are classified according to the length of net working time that their weakest link can resist abnormal opening under the action of specified destructive tools as follows:
Flat-hinged fully enclosed anti-theft security door
Grade A: 15min
Grade B: 30min
Grade C: 45min
5.3 Door frame and door leaf dimensions
5.3.1 The thickness of the steel plate used to make the steel door frame should not be less than 2mm. Flat-hinged fence type, folding fence type anti-theft security door Class A: 10 min
Class B: 20min
Class C: 30 min
5.3.2 When there is a lock hole on the steel door frame, the maximum clearance between it and the lock tongue (bolt) should not be greater than 3mm. 5.3.3 The overlap width between the door leaf and the door frame should not be less than 8mm, and the clearance between the door leaf and the door frame should not be greater than 4mm. 5.3.4 The gap between the hinge edge of the door leaf and the door frame should not be greater than 2mm, and the gap between the opening edge of the door and the door frame in the closed state should not be greater than 3mm.
5. 3.5 The gap between the door leaf and the ground plane should not be greater than 5mm, and the surface flatness of the door leaf should not be greater than 6mm. 5.3.6 The tolerances of the diagonal dimensions of the door frame and door leaf and the outer dimensions of the door leaf should comply with the provisions of Table 1. Table 1 Dimension tolerance
Tolerance range
2000mm
≤3mm
2 000~3 500 mm
≤4mm
>3500mm
≤5mm
5.3.7 An anti-intrusion device can be installed between the door frame and the door leaf or other parts. The device itself and the connection strength should be able to withstand 9 impacts of a 30kg sandbag without breaking or falling off.
5.3.8 After the door leaf is subjected to a 30kg sandbag soft impact load for 9 times, it should not produce a concave deformation greater than 5mm. 5.3.9 The horizontal or vertical fence spacing of the fence-type anti-theft security door should not be greater than 60mm, and the maximum area of ​​a single fence should not exceed 250mmX60mm.
5.3.10 The thickness of the steel panel of the fence-type anti-theft security door lock should not be less than 4mm, and its minimum dimension along the height direction of the door leaf should not be less than 300mm, and the dimension along the width direction of the door leaf should ensure the integral connection with the door leaf frame. 5.4 Door hinges
GB 17565—1998
5.4.1 The door hinges should be able to support the weight of the door body. When the door is opened 90°, the door body should not tilt, and the door hinge axis should not have a displacement greater than 2mm.
5.4.2 The door hinge should be flexible to rotate. The door body can be flexibly rotated 90° under the action of 49N pulling force. The hinge of the folding door leaf (or root) should be able to shrink and open under the action of 49N force, and its overall movement should be consistent. After the door leaf is folded, the height difference between the two adjacent leaf surfaces should not be greater than 2mm. 5.4.3 The door hinge should be strong enough to withstand the impact force and prying torque transmitted to the hinge when the hinge is impacted and cut by ordinary mechanical hand tools. Within the specified time, the door hinge should not break. When welding is used, the weld should not be higher than the hinge surface. 5.4.4 At the connection between the door hinge and the door leaf, under the action of 6000N pressure, the direction of force is the opening direction of the door. There should be no displacement greater than 8mm between the door frame and the door leaf, and the door leaf surface should not have a concave deformation greater than 5mm. 5.5 Door locks
5.5.1 Mechanical anti-theft locks
The door locks installed on anti-theft security doors shall at least meet the technical requirements of Class A mechanical anti-theft locks in GA/T73. The product model and manufacturer name of the selected mechanical anti-theft locks shall be indicated on the drawings. 5.5.2 Electronic password locks
5.5.2.1 Before entering the opening password for the electronic password lock, an opening procedure may be provided. The procedure shall be brief, reliable, easy to remember, and can be changed regularly or irregularly. After the door is closed, the electronic password lock shall enter the locked state. 5.5.2.2 When the electronic password lock senses an excitation of an impact force not greater than 100N, it shall not cause malfunction or damage. 5.5.2.3 When the electronic password lock is provided with a time password, the accuracy of its opening time shall not exceed ±2min during a 24h working period. 5.5.2.4 If the password of the electronic password lock is changed by changing the wiring position, the plug-in durability of the connector should be able to reach 6000 times without failure. The welding lead wire or the connector lead wire should not be broken, desoldered or have poor contact under the action of 49N tension for 1min. If the password is changed by the password disk, the password disk should not fail in 6000 keystrokes. 5.5.2.5 When the wrong password is entered three times in a row, the electronic password lock should be able to trigger an alarm. In the alarm state, the electronic password lock is in a non-decoding state. When the electronic password lock fails or the power is cut off, there should be an emergency opening method. 5.6 Anti-destruction
The anti-theft security door should not be able to open the door or cut a 615cm2 opening through the door body under the mutual cooperation of ordinary mechanical hand tools, portable power tools, etc. within the net working time specified by Class A, Class B, and Class C. 5.7 Alarm device
5.7.1 Anti-theft security doors can be installed with alarm devices, and their installation location should not be easily damaged by external factors and should not affect the opening of the door. 5.7.2 The alarm signal can be displayed in two forms, namely local sound alarm or access to the alarm transmission network. 5.7.3 When the door leaf and door frame are attacked by one of the following intrusions, the alarm device should send out an alarm signal within 30 seconds. The alarm time for each time should not be less than 1 minute.
a) The door body is subjected to an impact force of more than 300N; b) The sound level of metal hitting the door leaf and door frame is greater than 100dB (A). 5.7.4 The alarm device of Class C anti-theft security doors should also generate an alarm signal for intrusion attacks in one of the following ways. a) Flame cutting of the door leaf metal;
b) Using a key to continuously open the lock for more than 100 seconds. 5.8 Power supply
5.8.1 The alarm device or electronic password lock is powered by a primary or secondary battery. When the working voltage drops to 80% of the rated value or the specified value of the product, there should be an undervoltage alarm indication.
5.8.2 When the power supply voltage changes within the range of 85%~110% of the rated value, the alarm device should be able to work normally. 5.9 Electrical safety requirements
5.9.1 When an AC power supply is used on the anti-theft security door, the insulation resistance between its power supply input terminal and the shell or metal door body shall not be less than 200M0 under normal environmental conditions and not less than 5M0 under damp and hot conditions. 5.9.2 When an AC power supply is used on the anti-theft security door, the insulation resistance between its power supply input terminal and the shell or metal door body shall be able to withstand the 50Hz, 2kV AC voltage resistance test of GB17565-1998, and there shall be no breakdown or arcing phenomenon for 1 minute. 6 Test preparation
6.1 Test personnel
6.1.1 Test personnel should have specialized skills to open door locks and door bodies. Test personnel should study the technical drawings of anti-theft doors and the characteristics of the materials used, and determine the test sequence and specific test parts according to their weak links. 6.1.2 A destructive opening test team is composed of two test personnel. The test team determines the production of test samples and test conditions based on the specific situation of the product. When conducting anti-theft door destructive tests, two test personnel should take turns. 6.2 Test samplesbzxz.net
6.2.1 The test samples should be consistent with a certain part of the whole product in structure, material and size. The number of test samples for each test part is 1 to 3 pieces, which is determined by the test team.
6.2.2 When designing and manufacturing test samples, the installation and clamping requirements of the test equipment for the test samples should be fully considered. The installation and clamping should not affect the equivalence of the test samples.
6.3 Test sample installation
The anti-theft security door should be installed on the door body test equipment or on a special test fixing bracket according to actual requirements, and then carry out functional inspection and other tests.
7 Test method
7.1 Destruction test
The anti-theft security door should at least undergo the following destructive tests: a) Try to open an opening of 38cm2 within a semicircle of 150mm from the locking point of the door lock, and use your hands or tools to unlock the door from the inside through the opening
b) Drill out the lock core, turn the lock body with a screwdriver, open the door or push the folding door, c) Cut and trim the bars of the fence door with a hacksaw, cut the lock body with a long saw, and pry off the lock body connector with a crowbar, d) File, Punch the hinges and rivets of the folding door, pry and scrape the gap of the folding door leaf, and try to remove the folding door leaf; e) Drill and door frame hinges, use flat blade prying tools to remove the door hinges; f) Use a sleeve or similar wrench tool to apply torque to the door handle to try to open or break the locking block or rivet in the lock body; g) Use drilling, cutting, sawing, prying, scraping, tearing and other methods to try to open a 615cm2 opening on the door leaf; h) Remove the metal at the locking point of the door frame, insert the prying tool into the upper and lower gaps of the locking point, and try to loosen the lock tongue. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.1.4, 5.2, 5.4.3, 5.5 and 5.7. 7.2 Appearance and Dimension Inspection
When inspecting the appearance and dimensions, the following measuring tools should be used: steel tape measure, steel plate ruler, thickness gauge, vernier caliper with a scale value of 0.02mm, depth gauge, right-angle ruler of more than 300mm, and steel ruler with a length of 1m.
7.2.1 Surface Treatment Inspection
For products that have been in storage for more than 15 days, the surface treatment quality shall be inspected visually and by scraping off the local surface treatment layer. The inspection results shall meet the requirements of 5.1.1.
7.2.2 Gap Inspection
Insert the thickness gauge into the gap between the door leaf and the door frame, and into the gap between the door leaf and the door frame at the fitting surface. The maximum inserted thickness shall be used as the gap value. The measurement results shall meet the requirements of 5.3.2~5.3.5. 7.2.3 Dimension measurement
Use appropriate measuring tools to measure the two diagonal dimensions of the door frame and door leaf. The height dimensions of the door frame and door leaf are measured according to the positions of A--A and BB in Figure 1, the width dimensions are measured according to the positions of C--C and D-D in Figure 1, and the thickness of the door leaf is measured at the position marked by the circle in the figure. Based on the center line of the fence, test the fence interval and single fence area of ​​the fence door, measure the overlap width of the frame and leaf, the gap between the frame and leaf, and the steel panel of the fence door lock. The test results should meet the accuracy requirements of 5.3.1, 5.3.3, 5.3.5, 5.3.6, 5.3.9, 5.3.10 and the product drawings.
7.3 Door hinge test
7.3.1 Stability of door hinge force
Open the door leaf at 30°, 60° and 90° respectively, and the door leaf should be able to stop stably. Close the door leaf at 30°, 60° and 90° respectively to check whether the hinge part moves. The inspection result should meet the requirements of 5.4.1. 7.3.2 Door hinge rotation test
Install the spring tension device on the door handle, apply a 49N tension through the spring tension device, pull the door open, install the spring tension device in the opposite direction of the door, apply a 49N tension, and close the door. The test result should meet the requirements of 5.4.2. 7.3.3 Unevenness of adjacent leaves (roots) of folding door After the folding anti-theft safety door is compressed and folded, use a depth gauge to measure the height difference of adjacent leaves (roots). The measurement result should meet the requirements of 5.4.2.
7.3.4 Door hinge destruction test
Use the tools specified in 5.4.3 to conduct an artificial destruction test by one tester. The test results shall meet the requirements of 5.4.3. 7.3.5 Door hinge and door connection strength test
Use a 20mm×50mm×100mm steel pressure plate, place it in the position shown in Figure 2, apply static pressure to 6000N on the pressure plate, and keep it for 1 minute, check the relative displacement between the frame and the leaf and the concave deformation of the door leaf. The test results shall meet the requirements of 5.4.4. 100
Door hinge
Door hinge
Door hinge
7.4 Soft impact test
GB 17565—1998
Install the anti-theft safety door on the door body test equipment, connect the hanger crossbeam with a 1500mm long rope, and connect a 30kg spherical sandbag to the end of the rope as a pendulum. The height difference between the pendulum position and the landing point is 800mm (as shown in Figure 3). The landing point of the spherical sandbag is the lower 1/3 of the door leaf and all the locking points. During the test, each landing point is impacted 9 times, and the interval between each impact is 1min. Generally, the number of test samples should be determined according to the landing point position. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.3.7 and 5.3.8 (when doing the 5.3.7 test, the door lock should be opened). Hanger beam
Spherical sandbag
7.5 Electronic password lock test
7.5.1 Operation test
According to the normal opening procedure of the electronic password lock, conduct 5 opening tests. For the special program, conduct 5 correct inputs and 5 incorrect inputs. Close the door and check the status of the electronic password lock; change the electronic password 10 times to conduct the opening test; modify the special program 5 times, and conduct the opening test according to the electronic password selected in the test. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.5.2.1. 7.5.2 Impact resistance test
Fix the electronic password lock and keyboard or other password operation device on a 50mm thick wooden board, keep the electronic password lock in the power-on state, and knock with a 1.2kg hammer with a handle length of 450mm around the keyboard protective shell for 5 minutes. Use a measuring device to monitor that its impact force is not greater than 100N, and conduct the electronic password lock function test. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.5.2.2. 7.5.3 Timing test
The test of the time password of the electronic password lock should be set as 30min, 60min, 240min, and 960min as the time password cycle respectively. When the time password is enabled, start the electronic stopwatch. During the effective period of the time password, enter the correct password according to the prescribed procedure and repeat it 5 times. During the release period of the time password, enter the correct password according to the prescribed procedure and repeat it 5 times. At least one test should be performed at the upper and lower limits of the time. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.5.2.3. 7.5.4 Lead wire force test
Fix the connector lead wire or the welded lead wire on a 5kg test hammer, let the lead wire remain under the gravity of the test hammer for 1 minute, and use visual inspection and power-on working mode to check whether the contact of the lead wire is good. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.5.2.4. 7.5.5 Durability test of password disk and connector On the durability test device, press the password disk 6000 times at a rate of no more than 15 times/min, install the test sample on the electronic password lock to test the electrical operation function of the password disk, and all ten numbers from 0 to 9 should be tested; on the plug-in test device, perform 6000 plug-in and pull-out test on the connector to test the electrical performance of the connector. The measurement results should meet the requirements of 5.5.2.4. 7.5.6 Emergency opening interface test
Enter the wrong password three times to check whether the alarm state is generated; enter the special program and the correct electronic password during the alarm period to check the opening of the electronic 285
GB 17565--1998
password lock, artificially create a circuit fault in the electronic password lock and make it invalid, and check the function of the emergency opening interface of the electronic password lock. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.5.2.5.
7.6 Door lock test
7.6.1 Door lock test
Except for the mutual opening rate test, all other tests shall be conducted in accordance with the test method specified in Chapter 7 of GA/T73-1994. 7.6.2 Mutual opening rate test
Randomly select 100 locks, use the key of one of them to open the other 99 locks in turn, and repeat this test. For each lock opened, add 1 to the number of openings. For the same key, add 0.5 to the number of openings and calculate the mutual opening rate according to the following formula: R
X% = T(T=1) × 100%
Where: X%——mutual opening rate,
T—sampling quantity:
R——number of openings.
When the number of times the keys cannot be inserted into each other is greater than 0.1% of the test times, the test of this batch of samples is invalid and re-sampling is required. The test results shall meet the requirements of 5.5.1.
7.7 Alarm system test
7.7.1 Alarm trigger test
The alarm device is assembled into a complete system according to the product design requirements, and the alarm controller is used to monitor the alarm signal. The anti-theft security door is subjected to the intrusion attack specified in 5.7.3, and the electronic stopwatch is started at the same time. The time when the alarm signal of the alarm controller is generated and the change of the alarm state are observed and recorded, and the alarm signal is manually eliminated. This process is repeated 5 times in a row. The test results shall meet the requirements of 5.7.1, 5.7.2 and 5.7.3.
7.7.2 Alarm test for Class C anti-theft security door
The alarm trigger test for Class C anti-theft security door shall be carried out according to the conditions specified in 5.7.4 and the test method of 7.7.1. The test results shall meet the requirements of 5.7.4.
7.7.3 Power supply test
7.7.3.1 Undervoltage alarm test
Use a 0~32V DC regulated power supply with digital display to replace the primary or secondary battery, adjust it to the rated working voltage, and test the normal working performance of the product. Gradually reduce the working voltage, record the voltage value when the undervoltage alarm is generated, use an electronic stopwatch to record the alarm time, and observe the alarm display status. When the regulated power supply voltage is adjusted to the rated working value, it should return to normal. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.8.1. 7.7.3.2 Power supply adaptability range test
Use a 0~32V DC regulated power supply with digital display to power on the product normally. After the function is normal, increase the voltage to 110% of the rated value, check the product function, and then reduce the voltage to 85% of the rated value, check the product function. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.8.2. 7.8 Electrical safety test
Separate the alarm device and electronic password lock installed on the anti-theft safety door from the door to form a separate complete simulation test sample, and test it according to the test methods specified in 5.8.1 and 5.8.2 of GB10408.1-1989. The test results should meet the requirements of 5.9.1 and 5.9.2.
8 Inspection rules
8.1 Inspection classification
Inspection classification is divided into identification inspection and quality consistency inspection. Identification inspection is a series of complete inspections using several test samples of this model. It should be carried out when the main design, process, materials and parts are replaced or when production is resumed after suspension. Quality consistency inspection consists of four inspection groups:286
GB 17565 -1998
Group A inspection (batch by batch): full inspection when the product is delivered. Group B inspection (batch by batch): sampling inspection when the product is delivered. Group C inspection (cycle): once every six months. Group D inspection (cycle): once a year. 8.2 Test items
The test items and corresponding test methods and technical requirements and non-conforming classification of each type of inspection shall be as specified in Table 2. Table 2 Anti-theft safety door test items
Anti-theft safety door destruction test
Surface treatment inspection
Gap inspection
Dimension measurement
Door hinge stability test
Door chain rotation test
Difference between adjacent leaves (roots) of folding door
Door hinge destruction test
Door hinge and door leaf connection strength test
Soft impact test
11 Electronic password lock operation test
Electronic password lock anti-impact test
Electronic fixed Time lock test
Lead wire tension test
Password disk, connector durability test
Electronic lock emergency opening interface test
17Door lock test
Mutual opening rate test
Alarm trigger test
20|C-level anti-theft safety door alarm test
21|Undervoltage alarm test
22|Power supply adaptability range test
23 "Electrical safety test
8.3 Sampling rules
Technical requirements
5. 3. 2~5. 3. 5
5.3.1,5.3.3,
5.3.5,5.3.6
5.3.9,5.3.10
5. 3. 7,5. 3. 8
5. 7. 1~5. 7. 3
5. 9. 1,5. 9, 2
Unqualified
Consistency test
Group B|Group C Group D
8.3.1 For anti-theft security doors, only the Group B test shall be carried out in batches. Except for the destructive test, each product shall be subjected to the Group A test before being released. If there are any unqualified items, the product shall not leave the factory.
8.3.2 When conducting the Group C test, generally 0.5% of the batch products shall be sampled. For batches of less than 1,000 units, 5 units shall be sampled. 8.3.3 The number of samples for the Group B test of anti-theft security doors shall be in accordance with Table 3. 287
Batch range
9~15
91~150
151~280
281~500
8.4 Judgment rules
GB 17565-1998
Table 3 Normal inspection of each batch Sampling plan
Sample size
Qualified quality level AQL1.5
Qualified judgment number
8.4.1 If any of the test items specified in Table 2 does not meet the requirements of the Class A test, it shall be judged as a non-conforming product. Non-conforming judgment number
8.4.2 When a Class A non-conforming product is found, the inspection shall be stopped immediately, and measures shall be taken within the corresponding scope; the factors of Class A non-conforming products shall be eliminated before submitting for inspection. If it involves products that have been shipped, post-technical processing shall be carried out. 9 Marking, packaging, transportation and storage
9.1 Marking
All anti-theft doors shall have clear and firm markings. The markings shall have the following contents: a) Mark the relevant codes and marks in accordance with the provisions of Article 4.6; b) Manufacturer's name or special trademark or symbol. 9.2 Packaging
9.2.1 The outer packaging of the anti-theft security door should ensure that the product surface is not scratched or damaged, and does not deform during transportation and storage. The door frame and door leaf should be bundled: accessories such as alarm devices and locks should be packaged separately. 9.3 Transportation and storage
9.3.1 The packaged products should meet the transportation requirements of cars, trains, ships and airplanes. 9.3.2 Warehouses for storing products must have rainproof measures. 288
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.