title>Verification Regulation for Electronic Balance - JJG 1036-2008 - Chinese standardNet - bzxz.net
Home > JJ > Verification Regulation for Electronic Balance
Verification Regulation for Electronic Balance

Basic Information

Standard ID: JJG 1036-2008

Standard Name:Verification Regulation for Electronic Balance

Chinese Name: 电子天平检定规程

Standard category:National Metrology Standard (JJ)

state:Abolished

Date of Release2008-02-20

Date of Implementation:2008-05-20

Date of Expiration:2023-06-07

standard classification number

Standard ICS number:Metrology and Measurement, Physical Phenomena >> 17.100 Measurement of Force, Gravity and Pressure

Standard Classification Number:General>>Metrology>>A53 Mechanical Metrology

associated standards

alternative situation:Replaces the "Electronic Balance" section in JJG 98-1990

Publication information

publishing house:China Metrology Press

Publication date:2008-05-20

other information

drafter:Ding Jingan, Huang Jian, Li Yong, Zhang Zhi, Dai Fang, Ge Rui

Drafting unit:China National Institute of Metrology, Yunnan Institute of Metrology and Testing Technology

Focal point unit:National Technical Committee on Mass and Density Metrology

Proposing unit:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine

Publishing department:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine

competent authority:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine

Introduction to standards:

This regulation applies to the initial verification, subsequent verification and in-use inspection of electronic balances (hereinafter referred to as balances). JJG 1036-2008 Verification Regulation for Electronic Balances JJG1036-2008 Standard download decompression password: www.bzxz.net
This regulation applies to the initial verification, subsequent verification and in-use inspection of electronic balances (hereinafter referred to as balances).

This regulation adopts the relevant contents
of the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) International Recommendation R76 Non-automatic weighing instruments "Non-automatic weighing instruments" in terms of metrological performance requirements and main technical indicators.
When using this regulation, attention should be paid to using the current valid versions of the above-mentioned references.
1 Scope (1)
2 References (1)
3 Terminology and units of measurement (1)
3.1 Terminology (1)
3.2 Units of measurement (1)
4 Overview (1)
5 Metrological performance requirements (1)
5.1 Actual graduation value (d) (1)
5.2 Verification graduation value (e) (2)
5.3 Number of verification graduations (n) (2)
5.4 Grade of accuracy (2)
5.5 Maximum permissible error (MPE) (3)
6 General technical requirements (4)
6.1 Appearance requirements (4)
6.2 6. General requirements for structure (4)
6.3 Indication of weighing result (5)
6.4 Level indicator (6)
6.5 Zero-setting device (6)
6.6 Zero-point tracking device (6)
6.7 Tare device (6)
7 Control of measuring instruments (6)
7.1 Verification conditions (6)
7.2 Verification items (7)
7.3 Verification method (8)
7.4 Processing of verification results (9)
7.5 Verification cycle (9)
Appendix A Verification record format for electronic balances (10)
Appendix B Electronic balance calibration certificate inner page format (12)
Appendix C Electronic balance calibration result notification inner page format (13)

Some standard content:

National Metrology Verification Regulation of the People's Republic of China JJG 1036-
Electronic Balance
Electrainic. Balance
2008-02-20Promulgated
Implementation on 2008-05-20
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine issued JJG 1036---2008
Verification Regulation for
Electronic Balance
JJG1036—2008
Replaces JJG 98—1990
(Electronic Balance Part)
This regulation was approved by the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine on February 20, 2008, and came into effect on May 20, 2008.
Responsible unit: National Technical Committee on Quality and Density Metrology Main drafting unit: China National Institute of Metrology Yunnan Institute of Metrology and Testing Technology
Participating drafting unit: Mettler-Toledo Instruments (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Shenyang Longteng Electronics Co., Ltd.
Liaoning Institute of Metrology
Zhejiang Institute of Quality and Technical Supervision and Inspection
This regulation is entrusted to the National Technical Committee on Quality and Density Metrology to interpret the main drafters of this regulation!
JJG 1036—2008
Ding Jingan (China National Institute of Metrology) Huang Jian (Yunnan Institute of Metrology and Testing Technology) Participating drafters!
Li Yong (Mettler-Toledo Instruments (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.) Zhang Zhi (Shenyang Longteng Electronics Co., Ltd.) Dai Fang (Liaoning Institute of Metrology) Ge Rui (Zhejiang Quality and Technical Supervision Inspection Institute) 2
References
Terms and measurement units
3.Terms…
Measurement units
5 Metrological performance requirements
5.1 Actual graduation value (d)
Verification graduation value (e)
Verification graduation number (n)
5.4 Accuracy level
5.5 Maximum permissible charging error (MPE)
6 General technical requirements
6.1. Appearance requirements.…
6.2 General requirements for structure
6.3 Indication of weighing results
6. Level indicator
Zero-setting device
6.6 Zero-point tracking device
6.7 Tare device
7 Measuring instrument and its control
7.1 Verification conditions…
7.2 Verification items·
7.3 Verification methods·
7.4 Processing of verification results…
7.5 Verification cycle..||tt ||Appendix A Format of electronic balance verification record
Appendix B
Format inside the electronic balance verification certificate
JIG1036—2008
Format inside the notice of electronic balance verification results
(1)
(6)
1 Scope
JJG1036—2008
Verification procedures for electronic balances
This procedure applies to the initial verification, subsequent verification and in-use inspection of electronic balances (hereinafter referred to as balances). 2 References
This procedure adopts the relevant contents of the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) International Recommendation R76 Non-nutomatic weighing instruments in terms of metrological performance requirements and main technical indicators. When using this procedure, attention should be paid to using the current valid versions of the above-mentioned references. 3 Terminology and units of measurement
3.1 Terminology
3.1.1 Zero-selling device: a device that sets the indication to zero when there is no load on the balance pan.
3.1.2 Zero-tracking device: a device that automatically keeps the zero indication within certain limits.
3.1.3 Tared device: a device that sets the indication to zero when there is a load on the balance pan. 3.1.4 Multiple range: two or more weighing ranges: with different maximum weighing capacity and different actual scale values, each weighing range can be from zero to a relatively large maximum weighing capacity. 3.1.5 Multi-interval: only one weighing range, divided into several local weighing ranges according to different actual scale values. The local weighing range is automatically determined according to the increase or decrease of the applied load. 3.1.6 Maximum capacity: The maximum weighing capacity without adding tare weight. 3.1.7 Minimum capacity: When the weighing result is less than this value, it may produce too large relative error.
3.1.8 Weighing range: The range between the minimum and maximum capacity. 3.2 Units of measurement
The units of measurement used are: grams (kg), grams (g), milligrams (mg), micrograms (μ) and tons (t). 4 Overview
A measuring instrument that determines the mass of an object by the gravity acting on it and outputs the result with a digital indication. It is used for the transfer of brick mass value, object mass measurement, volume measurement and magnetic measurement, etc. It can also be used to determine other values, quantities, parameters or characteristics related to mass. 5 Metrological performance requirements
5.1 Actual graduation value (a) bzxZ.net
Refers to the difference between two relative indications.
5.2 Verification division value (e)
JJG 1036—2CH8
The value expressed in mass units is used to divide the level of balance and the measurement of input. The verification division value is selected by the manufacturer according to the requirements of Table 1.
5.2.1 The verification division value e can be in the following forms: 1×10# or 2×10* or 5×10
wherein is a positive integer, a negative integer or equal,
5.2.2 The verification division value e is specified by the following formula: 10d
Under normal circumstances, the verification division value e should also obey e-10*kg, where the midpoint is a positive integer, a negative integer or equal. 5.3 Verification division number (#)
The ratio of the maximum weighing capacity to the verification division value,
5.1 Accuracy level
5.4.1 Balances are divided into the following four accuracy levels according to the verification division value and the verification division number n: Special accuracy level
Commercial accuracy level
Medium accuracy level
Ordinary accuracy level
Symbol is ①
Symbol is center
Symbol is others
5.4.2 Relationship between balance accuracy level and, Table 1. Table 1 Relationship between accuracy of balance and e, r Graduation
Accuracy level
Special accuracy level
Kaohsiung accuracy level
Medium accuracy level
Ordinary accuracy level
Verification graduation value
I μgsr-lmg
Imgs*s50ng
0.1gse.2g
Can be less than 5×10°
5×10°
1×102
Unlimited
1×101
Note: In the last column of the above table, except for l mg (balance), the rest are expressed in e Calculate the minimum release amount. 5.4.3 For a balance with a single range, the verification division number x corresponding to the maximum weighing within the entire weighing range is given by the following formula:
5.4.4 For a balance with multiple ranges, the verification division number x corresponding to the maximum weighing within an independent weighing range is given by the following formula:
JJG1036—2008
Serial number of each independent weighing range)
5.4.4.1 The verification division value shall comply with e+>e(i=1,2), and indicate the corresponding Min, n, Mar. 5.4.4.2 When meeting different accuracy level requirements, the classification shall be based on the more stringent requirements. However, the weighing range and accuracy level of other ranges may be indicated in the verification conclusion in the inner page format of the balance verification certificate. 5.4.5 For a balance with multiple divisions, the maximum weight MaT in each local weighing range corresponds to the verification division number given by the following formula:
local weighing #range number)
5.4.5.1 The verification division value m meets ei-1>e (i=1, 2..) 5.4.5.2
Minimum weighing M—Ma
According to the accuracy grade of the balance
Accuracy grade
>5×10
Permissible error (MPE)
Maximum allowable error when loading or
Maximum allowable
class×19
Except the highest part weighing range, it should meet the requirements of Table 2. Grade
See Table 3
Table 3 Maximum allowable error
Loading (expressed in verification scale value)
2X10
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.