Some standard content:
rCS 03.100.40
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
GB/T 22900-—2009
General rules of science and technology research projects evaluationIssued on January 12, 2009
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of ChinaStandardization Administration of the People's Republic of China
Implementation on June 1, 2009
GB/T 22900—2009
1 Scope
Terms and definitions
3 Evaluation method
3.1 Evaluation formula
3.2 Evaluation weight
3.3 Evaluation effect
4 Evaluation procedure
Determine the evaluation subject
Determine the evaluation interval
Determine the evaluation purpose
Determine the evaluation plan
Determine the evaluation steps
Special.6 Calculate the evaluation results
Prepare the evaluation report
Appendix A (informative) Technology readiness level scale References
Appendix A of this standard is an informative annex.
This standard is proposed and managed by China National Institute of Standardization. GB/T 22900—2009
The drafting units of this standard are China National Institute of Standardization, China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, and Beijing Value-added Dragon Management Consulting Co., Ltd. The main drafters of this standard are: Dang Wanjin, Ju Jianguo, Yongwu, Suihong, Liang Xiuying, Xin Huiquan, Xia Xiaowei, Julong
CB/T 22900—2009
This standard provides a scientific and standardized method for the input-output efficiency evaluation of scientific and technological research projects, which can realize the standardized management of scientific and technological research projects.
The evaluation guidelines for scientific and technological research projects supporting this standard will be formulated in the future. The scientific and technological research projects involved in this standard should have clear expected goals, certain technical experience, strict time requirements, controllable cost constraints and be effective in the form of contracts. They can generally be divided into basic research projects, applied research projects and development research projects. 1 Scope
General rules for self-evaluation of scientific and technological research projects
GB/T 22900—2009
This standard specifies the evaluation methods for scientific and technological research projects in the field of natural sciences (hereinafter referred to as "research projects"). This standard applies to basic research, applied research and development research projects in the field of natural sciences. 2 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this standard. 2.1
Work breakdown structure
Work breakdown structure; WBEs The structure that expresses the hierarchical relationship of projects formed by decomposing research projects from top to bottom. It can generally be expressed in a table or tree diagram. 2.2
Work breakdown element; WBE
Work breakdown unit
The basic unit that can be independently expressed, measured and evaluated in the work breakdown structure. 2.3
Technology readiness level technology readiness level, TRL The technology maturity of the work breakdown unit. 2. 4
Technology readiness level scale technology readiness level scale; TRLs A measurement tool specified by the system for evaluating the maturity of a specific technology. Note: The technology readiness level scale is expressed in specified levels and is divided into 9 levels. For the technology readiness level scale of basic research, applied research and development research projects, please refer to Appendix A
Technology readiness level value technologyreadinesslevel; TRL The corresponding level of the technology readiness level of the work breakdown unit in the technology readiness level scale. 2.6
Technology readiness index
technology readiness index, TRI The weighted average value of the technology readiness level of all work breakdown units. k× WBF(k)
Where:
Technology readiness level value, 1-9:
ZWBE(E)
WBE() —
Number of work decomposition units that have reached the level of technology readiness. 2.7
Technology added value lechnology value add; TVA The difference between the technology readiness index at the end of the evaluation period and at the beginning of the period. TVA = TRITRI
CB/T 22900—2009
Technology added value during the evaluation period;
Technology readiness index at the end of the evaluation period;
Technology readiness index at the beginning of the evaluation period.
Technique recessive profit
technique recessive profit;TRP The realized technology added value.
Technology dominant profit
Technique dominant profit,TDp The realized economic benefit.
3 Evaluation method
3.1 Evaluation formula
Calculating the input-output ratio of scientific research projects is the basic method of scientific research project evaluation. The technical output ratio of scientific research projects is equal to the ratio of the completion rate of the implicit and explicit technical benefits of scientific research projects to the completion rate of the investment in scientific research projects, as shown in formula (3). O
Formula:
Input-output ratio of scientific research projects, D:
time point during the evaluation period;
Technical explicit benefit weight, 0
T-(wx+
(3)
The completion rate of the explicit technical benefits during the evaluation period is expressed by the ratio of the economic benefits realized during the evaluation period to the expected economic benefits.
Technical implicit benefit weight, , means the completion rate of the implicit technical benefits at a certain time point during the evaluation period, expressed by the ratio of the technical added value realized during the evaluation period to the expected technical added value;
The time between the evaluation periods The completion rate of scientific research project input is expressed as the ratio of actual input to planned input during the evaluation period. z.
3.2 Evaluation weight
In formula (3), the and release values have the following three situations: at a certain time point during the evaluation period, when there is no expected target for the explicit technical benefits of the scientific research project, = 0, W21: a)
at a certain time point during the evaluation period, when there is no expected target for the implicit technical benefits of the scientific research project, e-1,2-0; 6)
at a certain time point during the evaluation period, when both the explicit technical benefits and the implicit technical benefits of the scientific research project are expected, Cα≤1, Cual.
3.3 Evaluation effect
When ≥1, it indicates that the research project has not yet achieved the expected goal, indicating that the matching degree between the target value and the completion value ratio of the three elements of research project investment, technology implicit benefits, and technology explicit benefits has not yet reached expectations; when 1-1, it indicates that the research project has achieved the expected goal. It means that the matching degree between the target value and the completion value ratio of the three elements of research project investment, technology implicit benefits, and technology explicit benefits is completely in line with expectations: when ≥1, it indicates that the research project has exceeded the expected target. It means that the matching degree between the target value and the completion value ratio of the three elements of research project investment, technology implicit benefits, and technology explicit benefits has exceeded expectations. 4 Evaluation procedure
Determine the evaluation subject
An evaluation subject should be determined. The evaluation subject is the organization or individual responsible for the research project. 2
4.2 Determine the evaluation interval
GB/T22900—2009
An evaluation interval should be determined. The evaluation interval is generally composed of the start time and the end time. According to the evaluation interval, it can be divided into three situations: pre-evaluation, in-process evaluation, and post-evaluation. a) Pre-evaluation refers to various evaluations before and after the signing of the scientific research project contract; h) In-process evaluation refers to various evaluations from the signing of the scientific research project contract to the acceptance of the scientific research project; post-evaluation refers to various evaluations after the acceptance of the scientific research project. 4.3 Determine the evaluation purpose
The main evaluation purpose should be determined. The evaluation purpose is the main basis for the formulation of the evaluation plan. Determine the evaluation plan
An evaluation implementation plan should be determined, and the evaluation implementation plan should meet the requirements of the main evaluation purpose. 4.5
Determine the evaluation steps
The evaluation implementation steps should be determined
Calculate the evaluation results
The evaluation implementation steps should be made public within a certain scope. Data collection.
The data collected should come from data that are recorded and stored in a standardized manner on a daily basis. Therefore, scientific research projects should be managed according to the terms specified in this standard, and the basic data of scientific research project management should maintain a certain logical relationship.
The weight of implicit technology benefits and explicit technology benefits. For development research weight determination, the weight of explicit technology benefits should be increased according to the type of scientific research project; for basic research projects, the weight of implicit technology benefits should be increased, and the total target value and stage target of the three indicators of scientific research project investment, implicit technology benefits, and explicit technology benefits should be calculated.
No value, calculate the input
man output efficiency according to formula (3)
4.7 Prepare evaluation report
Based on the output efficiency calculated in the report and the actual situation of the scientific research project, prepare an evaluation report. P
GB/T 22900—2009
Appendix A
(Informative Appendix)
Technology Readiness Level Scale
The technology readiness level scale of scientific research projects can be prepared according to the type of scientific research projects, referring to Table A.1, Table A.2 and Table A.3 respectively. Table A.1 Scale of Technology Readiness Level of Basic Research Projects Levels
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 6
Level 7
Level 8
Level 9
Feature description
Generate new ideas and express them as conceptual reports Determined by peers as a direction worthy of free manipulation Determined by the organization as a specific goal worthy of exploration Simulation conclusions in laboratory environment are established
Conclusions of semi-physical simulations in laboratory environment are established Functional indicators of physical objects in experimental environment are testable Experimental results match theories
Papers published, reports filed, books published Papers and books cited , research report adopted report
Realistic conclusion
Main form of results
Semi-physical simulation conclusion
Test report
Identification conclusion
Papers, reports, works
Citations, evidence
Note 1: Basic research is an experimental or theoretical research conducted to obtain new knowledge about the basic principles of phenomena and observable facts (revealing the nature of objective facts, laws of motion, obtaining new developments, new theories). It is not aimed at any special or specific application or use, but generally has broad application prospects.
Note 2: The main goal of basic research projects is to acquire new knowledge, and its technical achievements should be recognized and accepted as new knowledge. Table A.2 Technology readiness level scale for applied research projects Levels
Level 2
Level 3 wwW.bzxz.Net
Level 4
Level 5
Level 6
Level 7
Level 8
Level 9
Feature description
New applications discovered and feasibility report formed
Application solutions for specific goals formed
Key function analysis and experimental conclusions established
Key functions verified in laboratory environment Key functions verified in relevant environments
Performance indicators of initial samples in pilot environments The performance index of the sample meets the requirements in the test environment. The sample is recognized by the user.
Positive sample, proprietary technology, patent technology are transferred report
Function conclusion
Simulation conclusion
Performance conclusion
Main results
Output conclusion
Patent, sample
Note 1: Applied research refers to creative research conducted to explore new uses that can be achieved through the results of basic research, or to explore new methods or new uses that should be adopted to achieve predetermined goals, directly solving practical problems in the objective world, mainly targeting specific goals or objectives. Note 2: The main goal of applied research projects is to obtain new uses, new methods, and new products, which is between basic research and development research and is closer to development research.
First level
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Sixth level
Seventh level
Eighth level
Ninth level
Table A,3 Development and research project technology readiness level scale Characteristic description
Observed the basic principles and formed a formal report Formed a technical concept or development plan
Key function analysis and experimental conclusions were established|| tt||Component damage verification in laboratory environment
Component damage verification in relevant environment
System prototype demonstration in relevant environment
Conclusion of system prototype test in actual environment is established. Actual system is completed and passed the actual verification
Actually passed the successful test of task operation, and sales report
Verification conclusion
Simulation conclusion
Model prototype
Pilot product
GB/T 22900—2009
Main form of results
Product, standard, patent
Note 1: Advanced research refers to the use of existing knowledge obtained from basic research, applied research and practical experience to produce new products, materials and devices, establish new processes, systems and services, and make substantial improvements and systematic work on the above items that have been produced and established. Note 2: The main objective of a research and development project is to obtain new products, and the technology readiness level should be the marketable products. GB/T22900--2009
References
(GJB2116-[991 Weapon Equipment Development Project Work Decomposition Structure], 1995. C. Mankins. NASA Technology Readiness Level-1 White Paper. 1995. US Millennium Project-Technology Readiness Level 2003. Ju Lan. Knowledge Productivity Measurement. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2007. Guide to statistics on science and technology, Division of statistics on science and technology-Office of statistics, UNESCO, Paris, Dccember, 1984. 『6
U.S. Department of Defense. Technology Readiness Level Assessment Volume 2. DOI5000)-2-R, 20)5, Ju Jianguo, Tang Fangjin. Theory and Method of Science and Technology Evaluation I. Basic Technology Added Value, Beijing: China Metrology Press, 2008. Scorpion Child
Skinny Science 5 Sweet
17bzw.cn Crispy Dai Sauce Dried Lotus Root Jaw
17izw.com Crispy Dai Cricket
Inter-Species Cricket Gathering Parrots Boom
1 Table 60 MealsResearch report adopted report
Realization conclusion
Main form of results
Semi-physical simulation conclusion
Test report
Identification conclusion
Paper, report, book
Citation, inclusion
Note 1: Basic research is an experimental or theoretical research conducted to obtain new knowledge about the basic principles of phenomena and observable facts (revealing the nature of objective facts, laws of motion, achieving new developments, new theories). It is not aimed at any special or specific application or use, but generally has broad application prospects.
Note 2: The main goal of basic research projects is to acquire new knowledge, and its technical achievements should be recognized and accepted as new knowledge. Table A.2 Technology readiness level scale for applied research projects Levels
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 6
Level 7
Level 8
Level 9
Feature description
New applications discovered and feasibility report formed
Application solutions for specific goals formed
Key function analysis and experimental conclusions established
Key functions verified in laboratory environment Key functions verified in relevant environments
Performance indicators of initial samples in pilot environments The performance index of the sample meets the requirements in the test environment. The sample is recognized by the user.
Positive sample, proprietary technology, patent technology are transferred report
Function conclusion
Simulation conclusion
Performance conclusion
Main results
Output conclusion
Patent, sample
Note 1: Applied research refers to creative research conducted to explore new uses that can be achieved through the results of basic research, or to explore new methods or new uses that should be adopted to achieve predetermined goals, directly solving practical problems in the objective world, mainly targeting specific goals or objectives. Note 2: The main goal of applied research projects is to obtain new uses, new methods, and new products, which is between basic research and development research and is closer to development research.
First level
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Sixth level
Seventh level
Eighth level
Ninth level
Table A,3 Development and research project technology readiness level scale Characteristic description
Observed the basic principles and formed a formal report Formed a technical concept or development plan
Key function analysis and experimental conclusions were established|| tt||Component damage verification in laboratory environment
Component damage verification in relevant environment
System prototype demonstration in relevant environment
Conclusion of system prototype test in actual environment is established. Actual system is completed and passed the actual verification
Actually passed the successful test of task operation, and sales report
Verification conclusion
Simulation conclusion
Model prototype
Pilot product
GB/T 22900—2009
Main form of results
Product, standard, patent
Note 1: Advanced research refers to the use of existing knowledge obtained from basic research, applied research and practical experience to produce new products, materials and devices, establish new processes, systems and services, and make substantial improvements and systematic work on the above items that have been produced and established. Note 2: The main objective of a research and development project is to obtain new products, and the technology readiness level should be the marketable products. GB/T22900--2009
References
(GJB2116-[991 Weapon Equipment Development Project Work Decomposition Structure], 1995. C. Mankins. NASA Technology Readiness Level-1 White Paper. 1995. US Millennium Project-Technology Readiness Level 2003. Ju Lan. Knowledge Productivity Measurement. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2007. Guide to statistics on science and technology, Division of statistics on science and technology-Office of statistics, UNESCO, Paris, Dccember, 1984. 『6
U.S. Department of Defense. Technology Readiness Level Assessment Volume 2. DOI5000)-2-R, 20)5, Ju Jianguo, Tang Fangjin. Theory and Method of Science and Technology Evaluation I. Basic Technology Added Value, Beijing: China Metrology Press, 2008. Scorpion Child
Skinny Science 5 Sweet
17bzw.cn Crispy Dai Sauce Dried Lotus Root Jaw
17izw.com Crispy Dai Cricket
Inter-Species Cricket Gathering Parrots Boom
1 Table 60 MealsResearch report adopted report
Realization conclusion
Main form of results
Semi-physical simulation conclusion
Test report
Identification conclusion
Paper, report, book
Citation, inclusion
Note 1: Basic research is an experimental or theoretical research conducted to obtain new knowledge about the basic principles of phenomena and observable facts (revealing the nature of objective facts, laws of motion, achieving new developments, new theories). It is not aimed at any special or specific application or use, but generally has broad application prospects.
Note 2: The main goal of basic research projects is to acquire new knowledge, and its technical achievements should be recognized and accepted as new knowledge. Table A.2 Technology readiness level scale for applied research projects Levels
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 6
Level 7
Level 8
Level 9
Feature description
New applications discovered and feasibility report formed
Application solutions for specific goals formed
Key function analysis and experimental conclusions established
Key functions verified in laboratory environment Key functions verified in relevant environments
Performance indicators of initial samples in pilot environments The performance index of the sample meets the requirements in the test environment. The sample is recognized by the user.
Positive sample, proprietary technology, patent technology are transferred report
Function conclusion
Simulation conclusion
Performance conclusion
Main results
Output conclusion
Patent, sample
Note 1: Applied research refers to creative research conducted to explore new uses that can be achieved through the results of basic research, or to explore new methods or new uses that should be adopted to achieve predetermined goals, directly solving practical problems in the objective world, mainly targeting specific goals or objectives. Note 2: The main goal of applied research projects is to obtain new uses, new methods, and new products, which is between basic research and development research and is closer to development research.
First level
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
Sixth level
Seventh level
Eighth level
Ninth level
Table A,3 Development and research project technology readiness level scale Characteristic description
Observed the basic principles and formed a formal report Formed a technical concept or development plan
Key function analysis and experimental conclusions were established|| tt||Component damage verification in laboratory environment
Component damage verification in relevant environment
System prototype demonstration in relevant environment
Conclusion of system prototype test in actual environment is established. Actual system is completed and passed the actual verification
Actually passed the successful test of task operation, and sales report
Verification conclusion
Simulation conclusion
Model prototype
Pilot product
GB/T 22900—2009
Main form of results
Product, standard, patent
Note 1: Advanced research refers to the use of existing knowledge obtained from basic research, applied research and practical experience to produce new products, materials and devices, establish new processes, systems and services, and make substantial improvements and systematic work on the above items that have been produced and established. Note 2: The main objective of a research and development project is to obtain new products, and the technology readiness level should be the marketable products. GB/T22900--2009
References
(GJB2116-[991 Weapon Equipment Development Project Work Decomposition Structure], 1995. C. Mankins. NASA Technology Readiness Level-1 White Paper. 1995. US Millennium Project-Technology Readiness Level 2003. Ju Lan. Knowledge Productivity Measurement. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2007. Guide to statistics on science and technology, Division of statistics on science and technology-Office of statistics, UNESCO, Paris, Dccember, 1984. 『6
U.S. Department of Defense. Technology Readiness Level Assessment Volume 2. DOI5000)-2-R, 20)5, Ju Jianguo, Tang Fangjin. Theory and Method of Science and Technology Evaluation I. Basic Technology Added Value, Beijing: China Metrology Press, 2008. Scorpion Child
Skinny Science 5 Sweet
17bzw.cn Crispy Dai Sauce Dried Lotus Root Jaw
17izw.com Crispy Dai Cricket
Inter-Species Cricket Gathering Parrots Boom
1 Table 60 Meals1995 US Millennium Plan - Technology Readiness Level 2003. Ju Lan. Knowledge Productivity Measurement. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2007 Guide to statistics on science and technology, Division of statistics on science and technology - Office of statistics, UNESCO, Paris, Dccember, 1984. 『6
US Department of Defense. Technology Readiness Level Assessment Volume 2. DOI5000)-2-R, 20)5, Ju Jianguo, Tang Fangjin. Science and Technology Evaluation Theory and Methods - Basic Technology Added Value, Beijing: China Metrology Press, 2008. Scorpion Child
Thin Science 5 Sweet
17bzw.cn Crispy Dai Sauce Monster Dried Lotus Root Jaw
17izw.com Crispy Dai Cricket
Interspecific Cricket Gathering Parrots
1 Table 60 Meals1995 US Millennium Plan - Technology Readiness Level 2003. Ju Lan. Knowledge Productivity Measurement. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2007 Guide to statistics on science and technology, Division of statistics on science and technology - Office of statistics, UNESCO, Paris, Dccember, 1984. 『6
US Department of Defense. Technology Readiness Level Assessment Volume 2. DOI5000)-2-R, 20)5, Ju Jianguo, Tang Fangjin. Science and Technology Evaluation Theory and Methods - Basic Technology Added Value, Beijing: China Metrology Press, 2008. Scorpion Child
Thin Science 5 Sweet
17bzw.cn Crispy Dai Sauce Monster Dried Lotus Root Jaw
17izw.com Crispy Dai Cricket
Interspecific Cricket Gathering Parrots
1 Table 60 Meals
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.