This standard describes the development, publication and implementation of the recognition and acceptance agreements for the work results of institutions engaged in similar conformity assessment and related activities. GB/T 27068-2006 Agreement on the recognition and acceptance of conformity assessment results GB/T27068-2006 Standard download decompression password: www.bzxz.net
This standard describes the development, publication and implementation of the recognition and acceptance agreements for the work results of institutions engaged in similar conformity assessment and related activities.
This standard is equivalent to ISO/IEC Guide 68-2002 "Agreement on the recognition and acceptance of conformity assessment results".
This standard has made editorial changes to the international standards or guidelines listed in the "References" of ISO/IEC Guide 68-2002. For those with corresponding national standards, the numbers and names of the national standards are adopted.
In this standard, all "intergovernmental agreements" that are not specifically specified as "inter-agency agreements" are referred to as "inter-agency agreements".
This standard is proposed and managed by the National Technical Committee for Certification and Accreditation of Standardization (SAC/TC 261). The
responsible drafting units of this standard are: Certification and Accreditation Administration of China, Fangyuan Mark Certification Group Co., Ltd.
Participating drafting units of this standard are: China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, China Quality Certification Center, China Electronics Technology Standardization Institute, China Household Electrical Appliances Research Institute. The
main drafters of this standard are: Chen Ying, Zhai Peijun, Zhang Hong, Ge Hongmei, Lin Feng, Xu Shiyu, Lu Mei, Bing Xuwei, Zhou Wenquan, Li Xijun.
ISO/IEC Guide 2:1996 Standardization and related activities - General vocabulary

ICS 03. 120. 20
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
GB/T27068—2006/1ISO/IECGuide68:2002Arrangements for the recognilion and acceptance ofconformity assessment resuits(ISO/IEC Guide 68:2002.IDT)
Published on December 20, 2006
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China Administration of Standardization of the People's Republic of China
Digital protection,
Implemented on June 1, 2007
GB/T27068—2006/1ISO/IEC:Guide 68:2002
Normative references
Terms and definitions
Contract requirements
Contracting parties
Qualification conditions
Unilateral obligations of the contracting parties
Joint obligations of the contracting parties
Relationship with other contracting parties
Limitations of the agreement
Contact persons
Contract signing:
Conditions for amendment,
Constructions for closing the agreement
Confirmation of compliance with international recognition requirements
Methods of confirming conformity
Principles and requirements for international recognition
Appendix A (informative) Example of agreement
Related agreements between accreditation bodies
International collaboration
Regional collaboration
A.3 Relevant agreements between certification bodies
Acceptance of test reports...
Recognition of certification results -
References
GB/T 27068—2006/IS0/IkC Guide 68:2002 Foreword
Standards and other issues: Guide 68:2002 Agreement on the recognition and acceptance of conformity assessment results. This standard has made abridged revisions to the international standards or guidelines listed in JS0/IFC: Guide 68: 2002 "References", and has adopted the numbers and names of national standards for existing corresponding national standards. In this standard, the term "intergovernmental agreement" is specifically indicated as "intergovernmental agreement". Appendix A of the standard is an informative list. This standard was proposed by the National Technical Committee for Certification and Accreditation of Standardization (SA/TC261) and was drafted by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration of China and the China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment. The drafting units of this standard are: National Certification and Accreditation Administration of China, China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, China Quality Certification Center, China Electronic Technology Standardization Research Institute, China Household Electrical Appliances Research Institute. The main authors of this standard are: Chen Ying, Zhai Peijun, Zhang Hong, Ge Hongmei, Lin Feng, Xu Yu, Pei Mei, Li Xuwei, Zhou Wenquan, Li Xijun. CB/T 27068—2006/ISO/IEC Guide 6B:2002
The primary objective of conformity assessment is to provide users with confidence that the requirements applicable to products, services and systems have been met. This responsibility can directly promote market acceptance of products, services and systems (which may include compliance with regulatory requirements): One of the reasons for repeated conformity assessment of goods and services in international trade is that conformity assessment users in one country lack confidence in the capabilities of conformity assessment bodies in other countries. Therefore, it is necessary for private and public purchasing powers, regulators and other users to have confidence in the cooperation of conformity assessment bodies and accreditation bodies.
This user confidence can be achieved through cooperation between conformity assessment bodies and/or accreditation bodies. Such cooperation can achieve recognition and promote the internationalization of cooperation among the various parties involved. This standard describes the elements and procedures currently used to establish and maintain such cooperation. 1 Scope wwW.bzxz.Net
CB/T 27068—2006/ISO/IEC Guide 68:2002 Agreement on the recognition and acceptance of conformity assessment results This standard describes the development, publication and implementation of agreements on the recognition and acceptance of the results of work of bodies engaged in similar conformity assessment and related activities. This standard is applicable to activities related to cross-border market transactions that are not regulated by the government. Although the content of this standard can be referenced in intergovernmental agreements on the regulation of goods and services transactions, this standard is illustrative and general in nature and does not specifically address many of the specific requirements that may be specified in intergovernmental agreements.
How to obtain and continuously enrich the human and institutional resources for conformity assessment required to participate in inter-institutional agreements is not within the scope of this standard. 2 Normative references
The following references are necessary for the application of this standard. For dated references, only the version cited is applicable. For undated references, the latest version applies to this standard (including all revisions). 1S0/IE Guide 2:1996 Standardization and related activities — Common vocabulary 3 Terms and definitions
The terms and definitions established in ISO/IEC Guide 2 and the following apply to this standard. Past: 1S01EC17000:2004 has replaced [ST)/IF Guide 2, Clauses 2 to 17 of 1S0E on conformity assessment. 3.1
Recognition agreement recognition arrangement agreement between participating bodies to recognize conformity assessment results produced by validly operated equivalent procedures of other participating parties. 3.2
Acceptance arrangement agreement between participating bodies to use conformity assessment results produced by recognized equivalent procedures of other participating parties that are validly operated. 3.3
Agreement group agreement group
All the contracting institutions of the agreement on which the arrangement is based, 3.4
peer assessment
The evaluation of an institution by representatives of other institutions in the agreement group or candidate institutions of the agreement group in accordance with the existing requirements. Note: In the standard. The term "agreement" refers to the document signed by the participants of the agreement group, 4.1 General
The results of the joint assessment given in 1.2 to 1.12 are the complete elements contained in the relevant agreement. Generally speaking, one agreement includes most of the elements.
4.2 Title
When the agreement has legal binding force, the term "mutual recognition agreement" is sometimes used. 4.3 Introduction
The agreement should usually include an introduction or preface briefly describing the origin and historical background of the agreement and details of the need that the agreement seeks to address, for example, to promote activities in the review and re-evaluation process. 4.4 Parties
The agreement should specify the type of organization that constitutes the agreement and, where applicable, details of legal status, location or other qualifications.
4.5 Scope
This element clearly defines the categories of products and/or industries and the conformity assessment activities covered by the agreement. 4.6 Qualification conditions
The agreement usually specifies the qualification conditions of the parties to the agreement. These conditions are usually based on documents (see "References") and include confirmation of the following requirements:
a) compliance with the relevant document requirements of the applicable "qualified body"; b) it has procedures to ensure the effective implementation of assessments within the scope of the agreement; c) it has available resources to maintain the ability to perform its obligations to the agreement group on a continuous basis. 4.7 Unilateral obligations of the parties
The statement by the parties that they agree to undertake obligations: or other requirements promised constitute an important part of the agreement. Typical obligations in existing agreements are as follows:
a) recognition of the equivalence of the activities of the contracting parties within the scope of the agreement; b) where appropriate,Accept the results of the work of other contracting parties within the scope of the agreement; promote public recognition of the equivalence of the work of the contracting parties and their results (when appropriate); d) keep confidential the confidential information marked by other contracting parties; c) bear legal responsibilities and liabilities, and report major changes to other contracting parties. Note: There are differences in the purpose of the agreement in requiring the contracting parties to accept the results. Some agreements do not require any results. Some agreements require one party to complete the agreement and use the results of other agreements to avoid unnecessary work for the other party in the decision-making process. 4.8 Joint obligations of the contracting parties
The statement that the contracting parties agree to jointly bear the obligations is a vertical content of the agreement. The joint responsibilities that often appear and are detailed in the agreement are as follows:
a) Evaluate and resolve complaints during the implementation of the agreement; b) Maintain and operate an existing system for regular monitoring and (or) review; handle and resolve disputes that arise within the contracting parties within the scope of the agreement; d) If agreed, the contracting parties use a common logo and (or) documents to ensure that: before agreeing to use the logo for a period of time, the contracting parties initially limit the scope of the agreement to build trust between them. 4.9 Relations with other treaty groups
Some international agreements provide for relations with other treaty groups, a typical example of which is relations between regional organizations with similar scopes of cooperation. In order to make such relations effective, the agreement may stipulate the conditions for regional organizations to join and maintain membership, so as to ensure that the signatories of the regional organization can meet the requirements of 4 and 7.
4.10 Term of the agreement
The agreement shall indicate the date of entry into force of the agreement, and may also stipulate the validity period, suspension or revocation of the agreement for one or more signatories. 4.11 Contact Person
Most agreements specify the contact person of the contracting party. The contact person is responsible for updating and exchanging information, publishing the details of the agreement in their respective regions, and identifying situations where the contracting party cannot fulfill its obligations under the agreement. 4.12 Signing of the Agreement
CB/T27068—2006/IS0/IECGuide68:2002 The text of the agreement usually contains the signature and title of the authorized personnel representing the contracting party organizations, and indicates the signing date. 4. 13 Conditions for Amending the Agreement The text of the Agreement shall generally include conditions (and procedures) for amending or changing the terms of the Agreement. Note: Appendix A lists the organizations that have signed the Agreement and provides the website containing the Agreement text (LRLs): You can consult this website to understand how the elements described in the Agreement are expressed in the Agreement. 5 Establishment of the Agreement Group 5.1 Confirmation of Compliance with International Recognition Requirements 5.1.1 In order to establish the Agreement Group, the parties need to have sufficient confidence that the qualified institutions that may become parties to the Agreement are capable of signing. 5.1.2 There are several common methods for demonstrating that participating organizations comply with the requirements specified in the applicable documents. The choice of these methods is usually determined by the contracting parties based on the quality assessment activities within the agreement. These methods are described in 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 and can be used when two or more organizations are involved. .2.1 Direct method
When trust can be established through direct contact with the proposed contracting body, the direct method is selected. The technical basis of this method is that the proposed contracting body is evaluated by all other contracting parties or representatives. For ease of operation, a review team is usually established by the participating institutions to conduct conformity assessment on behalf of the contracting party.
Note: Peer review is the main method for the general requirements of the market for the conformity assessment of qualified and recognized institutions. In addition to this conformity assessment, partners can also conduct non-conference, pre-certification or Discuss typical cases or conduct joint training courses. Collaboration: When applicable, methods such as proficiency verification are used as a step to confirm the equivalence of the work. Through the above methods, continuous trust can be established between partners.
5.2.2 Indirect method
In the indirect method, the participants establish a responsibilities for the external evaluation system based on the evaluation results provided by the recognized external evaluation system. In particular, it is a common method for the accreditation body to accredit the participants using equivalence procedures. This may include the situation where the accreditation bodies themselves are members of a certain agreement group. Therefore, the accreditation body agreement for this work supports the cooperation between conformity assessment bodies. In addition, it is stipulated in the agreement that one or more bodies (for example, certification bodies) may participate in the assessment. Bodies that have the necessary competence and do not engage in assessment activities within the scope of the cooperation should be selected. 5.2.3 Other methods The direct method described above is not necessarily exclusive and can also be used in conjunction with other product certification bodies to conduct direct evaluations and at the same time conduct indirect reviews of the testing laboratories they use. For example, in an international agreement, it is possible to directly or indirectly prove that an organization is qualified to become a signatory (direct proof is sufficient to conduct an assessment of the organization, and indirect proof is a participant in a regional group). Regardless of the method, the organizations that sign these assessments should have similar capabilities and should operate in an equivalent manner. In any case, the principle of cooperation between them in operation should be followed. 5.3 Principles and requirements for international recognition In order to facilitate the process of building confidence in conformity assessment results, key measures may include the following: - Requirements for the availability of auxiliary documents; - Requirements for the test and inspection methods used: They constitute the elements of the test, inspection or assessment of the approval process: 3 CB/T 27068—2006/IS0/IEC Guide 68:2002 Methods for evaluating measuring facilities and calibration test equipment; - Methods for controlling environmental test conditions;
- Format of test, inspection or evaluation reports; - Procedures for evaluating reports (which determine whether to approve or not); - Forms (e.g. certificates, marks) for notifying the parties of the results of the approval made in accordance with the procedures; - Procedures for review and decision-making;
Application procedures to be followed by relevant testing, inspection and certification bodies; - Methods for evaluating the competence of personnel:
- Accreditation procedures.
Internationally recognized requirements for conformity assessment bodies and accreditation bodies have been developed into ISO/IEC Guides and International Standards. The relevant documents are listed in the references.
A.1 Overview
Appendix A
GB/1 27068—2006/IS0/1EC Guide 68:2002 (Informative Annex)
Agreement Examples
A month ago, bilateral, regional and international agreements were implemented. Accreditation body agreements and groups of conformity assessment bodies agreements have also been formed: The following are examples of regional and international agreements, agreements between accreditation bodies and agreements between certification/registration bodies. All instances are subject to the content of the agreement specified in Chapter 4, and during the operation of the instance, provide an agreement maintenance mechanism that is consistent with the requirements at the time of establishment of the agreement (see Chapter 5).
4.2 Related agreements between accreditation bodies
A, 2. 1 International agreements
Take the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) Multilateral Recognition Agreement (IAF ML, A) as an example. IAF MI,A is a recognition agreement, which is based on the equivalence of the relevant recognition systems implemented by member organizations and confirmed through peer review between IAF member organizations. The accreditation bodies participating in the agreement (such as the accreditation bodies of quality management system certification bodies) recognize each other's capabilities: the peer review process implemented by the signatories provides a mechanism for building trust for this multilateral recognition agreement. In order to ensure that the signatory bodies continue to meet the relevant requirements, the signatories of the agreement conduct peer reviews approximately every 4 years. 4,2.2 Regional Agreement
Take the Asia-Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC)'s Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) as an example: APLACMRA is a regional recognition agreement. This is a typical regional agreement between laboratory accreditation bodies. Through this agreement, each accreditation body recognizes the technical equivalence of the reports/certificates issued by the accredited laboratories and promotes their acceptance by users. In order to ensure that the contracting parties continue to meet the relevant requirements, the contracting parties of the agreement shall conduct peer review approximately once a year. 4.2.3 Websites
Please refer to the following websites:
International Accreditation Forum (IAF) hilp://ial.nu International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (I.Ac) http://iatorg European Accreditation Cooperation (A) littp://eurupeanacredizlian.org Pacific Accreditation Cooperation (PAc) http://apcc-pac.arg Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC) http://www.aplalc.urg A3 Relevant agreements between certification bodies
A.3.1 Acceptance of test reports
Taking the International Commission for Testing and Certification of Products (IECFF) Product Certification and Recognition System (CB) as an example, the CH system is based on the agreement that the contracting parties agree to accept test data reports from other contracting parties under specified conditions. This trust is established through peer review of testing capabilities. Since some contracting parties have legal obligations in operating as certification bodies, the establishment of this trust is subject to legal restrictions, and the establishment of trust may also be subject to restrictions from the parties concerned. (B system is a multilateral agreement between product certification bodies similar to bilateral agreements. A.3. 2. Recognition of certification results
Take the International Certification Alliance (IQNet) as an example. IQNet is an alliance of certification bodies that implements multilateral recognition agreements in the field of management system certification/certification. According to the IS(3/1EC standard, international standards and peer review rules, the equivalence of the members is guaranteed and the credibility is maintained through initial review and regular re-evaluation of all members. IQNet member bodies recognize the certifications obtained by them. IQNet member bodies use the IQNet logo and the registration documents in the format of IQNet: GB/r2706B-2006/1S0/1ECGuide68:2002.
Take the IEC explosion-proof certification system (IF\IECEx) as an example. The IFCEx system is an acceptance agreement. The system provides manufacturers of electrical equipment used in explosive environments with a way to obtain conformity certificates. During this period, the certificate is accepted in all situations as having the same validity as the certification of the country. The certificate of conformity can be obtained by any certification body participating in the system. The certificate proves that the company operates a quality system that meets the requirements of the formal Ex system, namely IS9:I. Manufacturers with individual certificates of conformity can affix the IFC x mark on the equipment that has been proven to be qualified. The standard of this system is a single standard, a single certificate and a Chinese mark accepted worldwide. A.3.3 Website
Please refer to the following websites:
IECEE-C system lhttp://chscheine.orgIFC Ex system http://ieccx.conInternational Certification Alliance (IQNet) http://www.iqnct-cnrtificationi.comGB/T 27068--2006/ISO/1EC: Guide 68:2002 References
【11(B/T19001-2000 Quality Management System Requirements (ISO19001001:2000, i1)[2_
（GB/T270002006 Vocabulary and General Principles for Qualification Assessment (IS0/1EC17000.2001.H)T）ISO/IFC/TR17010:1998 General Requirements for the Accreditation of Inspection Bodies GR/T183462001
General Requirements for the Competence of Various Inspection Bodies (idt1S0/[EC:17020:1998)GB/T1548=-2000 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Standardization Laboratories (idtI5S0/IEC17025:1999)GB/T 15486
1995 General requirements for the operation and recognition of calibration and inspection laboratory accreditation systems (IS/IFC Guide 8:1993)
[7[IS0/IFC Guide 61:1996 General requirements for the assessment and accreditation of certification/registration bodies[8IS0/1EC Guide 62:1996 General requirements for bodies engaged in quality system assessment and certification/registration B/T 27065-2004 General requirements for product certification bodies (IS0/1F Guide 65:1896, IDT)9
[10]IS0/IEC Guide 66:1999 General requirements for environmental management system certification bodies Note 1: The corresponding international standards of Documents 37, 6", and [87 have been merged into IS0/11%:1701]:2C0-Conformity assessment - General requirements for accreditation bodies (GB; T 2:011-2005 General requirements for conformity assessment accreditation bodies). Note 2: The corresponding international standard of document 57 has been replaced by 1S0/1F: 17023; 2005 standard. GB/T 27068-2006
The People's Republic of China
National Standard
Agreement on the Recognition and Acceptance of Qualification Evaluation Results GB/T 270682006/1S/1E: CUn 08:22Published and distributed by China Standards Press
No. 16, Lanjia Hebei Street, Fuxingmenwai, Beijing
Postal code: 10:0015
pjhl.spe.tie1,cn
Tel: 6852394668527518
Printed by Qinfudao Printing Factory of Zhongzhou Standards Press Distributed by new bookstores in various places
This book is 880×12 1/16
Zhang. Mathematics
2007 1st edition
No.: 153266: 1-20128 Price: 14,00 yuan Reported by the publishing center of our company to replace
If there is any printing error
Copyright infringement will be investigated
Report phone: (010) 68533533
200:89 aping 1
11/900289017020: 1998) GB/T1548=-2000 General requirements for the capabilities of testing and accreditation laboratories (idtI5S0/IEC17025: 1999) GB/T 15486
1995 General requirements for the operation and recognition of calibration and inspection laboratory accreditation systems (IS/IFC Guide 8:1993)
[7[IS0/IFC Guide 61:1996 General requirements for the assessment and accreditation of certification/registration bodies[8IS0/1EC Guide 62:1996 General requirements for bodies engaged in quality system assessment and certification/registration B/T 27065-2004 General requirements for product certification bodies (IS0/1F Guide 65:1896, IDT)9
[10]IS0/IEC Guide 66:1999 General requirements for environmental management system certification bodies Note 1: The corresponding international standards of Documents 37, 6", and [87 have been merged into IS0/11%:1701]:2C0-Conformity assessment - General requirements for accreditation bodies (GB; T 2:011-2005 General requirements for conformity assessment accreditation bodies). Note 2: The corresponding international standard of document 57 has been replaced by 1S0/1F: 17023; 2005 standard. GB/T 27068-2006
The People's Republic of China
National Standard
Agreement on the Recognition and Acceptance of Qualification Evaluation Results GB/T 270682006/1S/1E: CUn 08:22Published and distributed by China Standards Press
No. 16, Lanjia Hebei Street, Fuxingmenwai, Beijing
Postal code: 10:0015
pjhl.spe.tie1,cn
Tel: 6852394668527518
Printed by Qinfudao Printing Factory of Zhongzhou Standards Press Distributed by new bookstores in various places
This book is 880×12 1/16
Zhang. Mathematics
2007 1st edition
No.: 153266: 1-20128 Price: 14,00 yuan Reported by the publishing center of our company to replace
If there is any printing error
Copyright infringement will be investigated
Report phone: (010) 68533533
200:89 aping 1
11/900289017020: 1998) GB/T1548=-2000 General requirements for the capabilities of testing and accreditation laboratories (idtI5S0/IEC17025: 1999) GB/T 15486
1995 General requirements for the operation and recognition of calibration and inspection laboratory accreditation systems (IS/IFC Guide 8:1993)
[7[IS0/IFC Guide 61:1996 General requirements for the assessment and accreditation of certification/registration bodies[8IS0/1EC Guide 62:1996 General requirements for bodies engaged in quality system assessment and certification/registration B/T 27065-2004 General requirements for product certification bodies (IS0/1F Guide 65:1896, IDT)9
[10]IS0/IEC Guide 66:1999 General requirements for environmental management system certification bodies Note 1: The corresponding international standards of Documents 37, 6", and [87 have been merged into IS0/11%:1701]:2C0-Conformity assessment - General requirements for accreditation bodies (GB; T 2:011-2005 General requirements for conformity assessment accreditation bodies). Note 2: The corresponding international standard of document 57 has been replaced by 1S0/1F: 17023; 2005 standard. GB/T 27068-2006
The People's Republic of China
National Standard
Agreement on the Recognition and Acceptance of Qualification Evaluation Results GB/T 270682006/1S/1E: CUn 08:22Published and distributed by China Standards Press
No. 16, Lanjia Hebei Street, Fuxingmenwai, Beijing
Postal code: 10:0015
pjhl.spe.tie1,cn
Tel: 6852394668527518
Printed by Qinfudao Printing Factory of Zhongzhou Standards Press Distributed by new bookstores in various places
This book is 880×12 1/16
Zhang. Mathematics
2007 1st edition
No.: 153266: 1-20128 Price: 14,00 yuan Reported by the publishing center of our company to replace
If there is any printing error
Copyright infringement will be investigated
Report phone: (010) 68533533
200:89 aping 1
11/9002890
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.