Some standard content:
G/T 19273—2003
H/119273-2003 Enterprise Standard 4 Votes Evaluation and Revision 3 is the first name of the enterprise standard system series, this series of standards is summarized as follows:
[H/T15406-2003% Enterprise Standard System Requirements: 6B/1497-70036 Enterprise Standard System Technical Standard System 3: G/15488200% Enterprise Standard System Requirements Management Research and Development and Work Standard System; 123-200 Enterprise Standard System Evaluation and Improvement 3. This standard is a guiding document for the establishment of a standard system and the evaluation and improvement of the enterprise standard system: enterprises can tailor the content specified in this standard according to their needs to meet certain evaluation needs. The conclusion of the evaluation and confirmation is the main evidence of the continuous improvement of the enterprise, and can be used as evidence of the enterprise's explicit and responsive commitment to the society.
Appendix A and Appendix 6 in this standard are normative appendices. This standard is a national standard for the management of the electronic industry. This standard is issued by the Enterprise Standardization Branch of the China Association for Standardization. This standard is drafted by the China Association for Standardization, Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, Fujian Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, four provincial quality and technical supervision bureaus, Haier Group, Beijing Railway Standardization Bureau, China Standardization Association Enterprise Standardization Branch, Chengdu Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau.
Main contributors to this standard: Zhang Qinghua, Ci Fenghua, Chu Li. Yuan Hua, Shang Youhuo, Ling Shi, this machine period. Quality Zili, Xu Xinzhi, Shu Zuoqiang: This standard is issued for the first time.
1 Scope
Evaluation and Improvement of Enterprise Standard System
GB/T 19273—2003
This standard specifies the evaluation principle and basis, evaluation conditions, evaluation methods and evaluation criteria, evaluation content and change requirements, as well as the improvement of the purpose of evaluation and confirmation.
This standard is suitable for evaluating the conformity and effectiveness of enterprises that have established standard systems: 2 Normative References
The following documents become clauses of this standard through reference. For any referenced document, all subsequent documents (excluding errata) shall not be outdated, however. The latest versions of these documents shall be used as the reference for the establishment of this standard. For citations without date indication, the latest version applies to this standard. GTVT1S01G Principles and requirements for the compilation of standard system tables GB/15017 Guide for the compilation of enterprise standard system tables CB/1496-200% Requirements for enterprise standard systems GT/1:497-200m>3 Enterprise standard system Technical standard system GB/T15498200:4 Enterprise standard management system and non-standard parts system 3 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this standard: 3.1
Enterprise standard system self-assessment selrrerjeworenerprlsestandardsystem Activities conducted by an enterprise to determine whether the various standards involved in the establishment and implementation of its standard system and the various related standardization work have met the appropriateness, adequacy and effectiveness of the established objectives. 3. 2
The confirmation of the enterprise standard system level is the objective certification activity for judging the enterprise's connection and implementation of the standard system and the promotion of related standardization.
4 Principles and basis of evaluation
4.1 Principles of evaluation
The implementation of the enterprise standard system is the self-evaluation (or internal evaluation) of the enterprise and the recognition (social confirmation) by the evaluation agency called by the competent department. Whether it is internal evaluation or social confirmation, the evaluation and confirmation personnel should adhere to the following principles to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of the evaluation
The evaluation principles are as follows:
The basis for judgment is:)
These principles are:
The standard is consistent with the actual situation and the principle of fairness.
4.2 Basis for evaluation and confirmation
The basis for the evaluation and confirmation of the enterprise standard system is as follows: a) Relevant national policies and measures!
GB/T19273—2003
1) Relevant laws, regulations, rules and mandatory standards: The enterprise standard system has been collected from national standards: GB/T15496.1, GB/T15497, GB/T1:4S and (/T1315, GBT13017
5 Self-evaluation
5.1 Basic conditions for self-evaluation
The basic conditions for self-evaluation of the international standard system should be: 1) The enterprise shall establish a standard system that meets the production, operation and management requirements of the industry, and the standard system documents shall be valid for three months after approval.
b) The enterprise shall have a full-time or full-time standardization management organization and personnel and clear standardization functions. （）Enterprise staff should be familiar with the enterprise's policies, standards, and the responsibilities and duties of their departments and positions after professional knowledge training on standardization; （）Enterprise managers and middle-level managers should be familiar with the national laws, regulations and regulations on standardization, and master the relevant contents of the enterprise's standard system; （）Establish a self-evaluation team for the standard system led by the representative of the senior management, and formulate a relatively complete evaluation plan. 5.2 Requirements for self-evaluation organization and personnel 5.2.1 Evaluation organization （）Establish a self-evaluation team for the standard system led by the representative of the highest management, and determine a team leader. Members include the heads of various departments or positions (external experts can also be hired). The number of team members is determined by the enterprise itself. 5.2.2 Evaluation personnel
Evaluation team members should receive enterprise standardization training, have relevant professional technical knowledge, master GB/113496, CB/T15497, GT/T15495 and other series of standards, and be familiar with enterprise production, business management conditions and enterprise standard documents. 5.3 Self-evaluation methods and procedures
5.3.1 Evaluation party
Evaluation generally adopts external evaluation as the method. Small enterprises form an independent evaluation team to conduct an overall evaluation on the established standard system, the implementation of relevant standards and the standardization work. The specific methods are mainly through observation, questioning, listening to the other party's statements, inspection, filming, and testing to obtain objective evidence. According to the valuation results of the data audit record (see Table A2 and Table A4 in Appendix A), corrective and preventive measures shall be taken for the items that do not meet the standards, and improvements shall be made accordingly. 5.3.2 Evaluation Procedure
The evaluation activities shall be carried out according to the following procedures
a) Formulate evaluation plan:
Establish evaluation team;
Evaluation preparation!
1) Evaluation implementation:
Compile evaluation report and non-conformity report (see Table A3 and Table A4 in Appendix A);
Handling of evaluation results:
B) Examination and punishment.
5.4 Contents and requirements of self-evaluation
The contents and requirements of self-evaluation shall be the same as those specified in Chapter 1 of this standard and confirmed by the evaluation agency confirmed by the standardization main supplier department.
5.5 Disposal of results of self-evaluation
After the enterprise conducts self-evaluation, it shall produce a self-evaluation report and non-conformity report, analyze the results of the self-evaluation and the root causes of non-conformities, formulate corrective and preventive measures, and make them clear to all employees, so as to effectively encourage employees to actively participate in the internal evaluation and continuous improvement of the enterprise standard system.
6 Confirmation by evaluation agencies
6.1 Basic requirements for confirmation
GB/T19273—2003
6.1.1 Confirmed by an evaluation agency recognized by the standardization and chemical management department, except for the case where the enterprise applies for it by itself, the applicant enterprise shall meet the following conditions: a) It shall have legal person qualifications; b) The enterprise standard system documents are complete, in line with the actual situation of the enterprise, and meet the production, operation and management requirements of the enterprise: After the release of the document, it shall be implemented for more than six months and can be effectively operated. The production product standards must be valid, and the products shall have a test report issued by a nationally recognized inspection agency; c!
Products that adopt international standards must be recognized by the standardization authorities or obtain the standardization mark certificate! Enterprises should have a standardized organization and personnel that meet the requirements of production, operation and management, and have clear international standardization duties: The veto conditions for confirmation are as follows:
Enterprises have established and operated an effective enterprise standard system, and the product standard rate has not reached 100%, and non-standard production and products will not meet the industry or local mandatory standards:
Enterprises have major product quality, production safety, occupational health, environmental management and other incidents within three years and have been notified or punished by the state, local or local administrative departments: including criticism and publicity in the news media by national or local quality supervision departments! Randomly check product quality and meet the requirements of product standards. If any of the items are unqualified in random inspections for two consecutive years, they shall not be recognized by the social recognition of the enterprise standard system. 6.2 Confirmation of organization and personnel requirements
6.2.1 Confirmation of organizational structure
The confirmation organization must be an expert group recognized by the main department for the overall evaluation of the loom efficiency. The expert group shall have a group leader and 3 people. The number of experts in the group can be determined according to the scale of the enterprise, generally not more than 100 people: The confirmation organization’s qualifications must comply with relevant national regulations, and then the main department shall certify the organization’s standard parts system and the confidentiality certificate of the evaluation organization 3. The certificate is valid for two years. Two weeks before the expiration of the validity period, the assessment agency can submit an application for extension to the acceptance department after review, and the validity period can be extended for the current year. If the application for extension is not submitted before the expiration, the qualification confirmation certificate will be valid. 6. 2. 2 Confirmed assessors and
Confirmed assessors should meet the following conditions: a) undergo training and examination organized by the standardization administrative department, and obtain the qualification certificate for confirmed assessors: b) have a college degree or above and a technical title of intermediate or above; c) be able to correctly implement the national policies, policies and laws related to standardization, and have a good command of the national standards and related professional knowledge; d) have been engaged in standardization work for more than 1 year, with a certain working frequency and training! And comprehensive evaluation can solve practical problems in the confirmation process:
Comply with regulations, adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts, and have a positive work style. 6.3 Confirmation methods and procedures
6.3.1 Confirmation methods
Confirmation methods should be carried out by taking the inspection form and recording the changes in the record, listening to the staff's comments, checking, verifying, etc. to obtain objective evidence. Before confirmation, the standard system components should be evaluated and scored to see if they meet the standard requirements. The scoring results should be delivered to the enterprise to determine whether the standard system components are qualified, and a confirmation report and confirmation conclusion should be provided to the confirmed enterprise.
6. 3.2 Accreditation Procedures
The assessment personnel and enterprises should follow the following procedures: Accreditation
GB/T19273--2003
When the enterprise assessment agency submits the application, it should submit the following materials: 1) Enterprise standard system confirmation form (Table A.1 in Appendix A) and self-assessment report 2) Enterprise standard system form and standard system components! 3) Proof of the quality level of the main products: 1) Relevant diagrams, tables and materials of the division of labor of the standardization management organization personnel b): Accreditation preparation
The confirmation expert group should read the relevant materials submitted by the enterprise before the confirmation, formulate the confirmation plan, checklist, detailed analysis table, and determine the start date of the certification. The enterprise that has been confirmed shall hold the first meeting, the last meeting of the on-site inspection and the announcement of the evaluation and confirmation conclusion. e) Confirmation implementation
Confirmation screening should be carried out according to the confirmation plan formulated in advance. The confirmation expert group should stay in the enterprise for no more than 10 years to evaluate and confirm. e) Preparation of confirmation report and non-conformity report
After evaluating and confirming the enterprise, the confirmation expert group should submit a formal confirmation report and non-conformity report to the enterprise. e) Handling of confirmation results
See 7.5 of this standard for the content and requirements of evaluation and confirmation.
7.1 Requirements for standardization work
7.1.1 The general policy and objectives of the enterprise should be formulated, and there should be clear objectives, goals and specific requirements for standardization work: 7.1.2 There should be a complete standardization organization chart and clear functional requirements. 7.1.3 Formulate standardization plans and plans suitable for the development requirements of the enterprise and standardization training plans for employees. 7.1.4 Standardization information management should meet the requirements of GB/T15496. 7.1.5 The enterprise standard system shall be complete and in compliance with the requirements of GB/T15495, GB/T15497 and GB/T1498. The enterprise standard system shall meet the requirements of GB/T13016 and GB/T13017. 7.1.6 The formulation and revision of enterprise standards shall comply with the provisions of GB/T1546, and the implementation of standards shall meet the requirements of standards screening. 7.1. The adoption of international standards and foreign advanced standards shall comply with the requirements of GB/T15496. 7.2 The formulation of technical standards shall be in accordance with the requirements of GB/T15496. 7.2.1 The technical standard system (including system table, catalog, number) shall be integrated and in compliance with the requirements of GB/T15497. 7.2.2 The construction of the technical standard system shall be combined with the needs of the industry. The composition content is shown in Figure 2 of GB/T15497-200a (the hierarchical structure of the enterprise technical standard system).
7.3 Requirements for the preparation of management standard system and work standard system 7.3.1 The management standard system and work standard system (including system tables) are well-structured and complete, and meet the requirements of GB/T15499. 7.3.2 The composition of the standard system is shown in Figure 1 of GB/T5498-2003 (the structural form of the management standard system). 7.3.3 The work standard system (including system tables, records, and numbers) is reasonably structured. The content and format of the writing meet the requirements of GB/15498. 7.3.4 The work standard is complete and can meet and realize the requirements of technical standards and management standards. 7.3.51 The work standard system has inspection and verification requirements. Various records and forms should be prepared according to the actual situation of the enterprise. 7.4 Technical standards. General management Implementation, monitoring and improvement of standards and work standards 7.4.1 There are implementation supervision plans and implementation procedures for technical standards, management standards and work standards. 7.4.2 The implementation of technical standards, management standards and work standards shall meet the requirements of the standards, and product quality, production safety, occupational health, environmental protection, etc. shall all meet the requirements of the standards.
7.4.3 The qualified rate of inspection and testing of equipment and material resources shall meet the requirements of the standards. There shall be corresponding records or notifications. 7.4.4 The product realization process shall be subject to quality control. Each process shall be subject to standard inspection and there shall be records of qualified or unqualified products.
The quality control of packaging, handling, storage, installation and delivery shall meet the requirements of the standards and shall be recorded and archived. 7.4.5
GR/T19273—2003
7.4.6 The control of the sales and service process shall be It meets the standards and can meet customer requirements. All departments shall coordinate and communicate with each other, and take corrective and preventive measures for non-conforming items.
7.4.7 The standardization review of new product development, improvement, technical transformation and technology advancement shall comply with the relevant standardization laws, regulations, specifications and production standards.
7.4.8 The monitoring and inspection of standard implementation shall comply with the requirements of GT/T15496: 7.4.9 A standard system evaluation and continuous improvement mechanism shall be established, and improvement measures shall be formulated and eliminated through the evaluation, analysis and detailed review of non-conforming items, so as to continuously improve the enterprise standard system and various standardization management work. 7.5 Confirmation and handling
7.5.1 After evaluation and confirmation by the confirmation expert group, the confirmation expert group shall provide the enterprise with a formal evaluation and confirmation report based on the scoring results (please refer to the enterprise evaluation report system in Appendix A).>7. 5.2 The enterprise that has been confirmed as qualified shall be issued a certificate of enterprise standard system confirmation by the government and local standard management department through an independent and impartial evaluation organization recognized by the government and local standard management department, and the certificate shall be announced to the public at the same time. For the enterprise that is confirmed as unqualified, the confirmation organization shall give the reason for the unqualified.
7.5.33 The validity period of the enterprise standard confirmation certificate is three months: within the first three months of the expiration of the certificate, the enterprise that has been confirmed as qualified shall apply to the original issuing unit for re-examination. If the certificate is unqualified, the original issuing unit has the right to revoke its certificate. 7.5.4 The enterprise that has been confirmed as qualified shall clearly indicate the enterprise standard system recognized qualified mark on the product packaging, label and manual. 8 Improvement
Continuous improvement is an effective way for enterprises to continuously improve their operations and management, and to realize the development of enterprises. Continuous improvement should be carried out in accordance with the P-D-CA (standardization-implementation-inspection-improvement) model. 8.1 Daily Improvement
Daily improvement includes collecting relevant non-conformity information, determining information collection, analyzing the causes of non-conformity, formulating corrective measures, and conducting rectification.Avoid recurrence of defects. 8.1.1 Information Sources
Information for improvement
Customer feedback:
Measurement, inspection, test report:
A kind of record. The number of periods in the report
Social survey:
Suggestions of engineers.
8.1.2 Data Analysis
The standardization department organizes relevant personnel to analyze the data, determine the existing and potential root causes of problems, and propose solutions. 8.1.3 Formulate corrective and preventive measures
Based on the results of data analysis and tests, the enterprise standardization department shall jointly formulate corrective and preventive measures with relevant departments. 7.4 Continuous Improvement
Continuous improvement is the process of enterprises correcting and improving the standard system documents or general personnel through implementation. The results are achieved in a timely manner. Enterprises are also relatively slow! Relevant personnel participate in the implementation process of rectification and prevention. General knowledge of continuous improvement of high-quality engineering: B.2 Improvement after evaluation
According to the results of regular or irregular self-evaluation or meeting confirmation, the enterprise standardization functional department will organize employees to analyze and test the non-conforming items together with relevant departments, propose improvement and prevention measures, and commit to implementation. At the same time, the effectiveness of the improvement process will be tracked and evaluated. GR/T19273—2003
Appendix A
[Normative]
Application form for confirmation of enterprise standard system
Confirmation and audit form of enterprise standard system
Application form for confirmation of enterprise standard system
Enterprise name
Contact person
Contact number
Application period
Enterprise name
Appointed representative
Enterprise management type
Economic industry
Standardization management
Organization name
Enterprise staff station
Product customer service
Product information center
Enterprise standard system
Establishment time
Business self-evaluation
Situation discussion
Application opinions (foreign policy)
Implementation standard number
Table A. 1 (strand)
Relevant loom manufacturer
Registered address
Manufacturer address
Standardization department
Name of person
Enterprise technical personnel and
Shidong personnelwww.bzxz.net
Purchase standard number
International standard
Execution standard control director
An Jixiang registration number
Return to foreign training standard
GiH/T 19273—2003
General number:
(station) urban area (county)
collection month process prosperous
color report number
enterprise logo city graduation system
evaluation machine all ministers)
note washing type city write the total economic nature, from state-owned, beauty, accumulation, joint-stock, etc., legal line write the enterprise from this line,: machine, cow, medium power metallurgy, chemical, construction finance, gold, light industry station dry agriculture north, poly service, etc., (GA/T 19273—2003
Year department (week position)
Evaluator's name
Evaluation documents
Inspection items and content
Enterprise standard parts system inspection record
Name of department head or post
Standardized parts
On-site inspection record
Form A, 3 Enterprise standard system self-evaluation report 25mm
Enterprise standard system self-evaluation report
Enterprise name||tt ||Evaluation length
Contact number
Evaluation date
XXXXXXXXX
Benefit cover)
CB/T19273—2003
297mml
CB/T19273—2003
No.:
Price increase date
Evaluation, core return
Detailed price guarantee
Not suitable for internal narrow
Red Zhenghe wine change fine full life to bear| |tt||Completion time
Table 4.3 (continued)
Enterprise self-evaluation report
Price cut-off period
Department responsible person
Date:
Two-level project
Standardized management
Technical standard system
Management standard system
Work standard system
Implementation and improvement
However, the score of each item
Whether the item is met
Evaluation method
Specified score
Table A.3 (general)
Enterprise self-evaluation score
Actual score
CB/T192732003
Score shows
E, the operation has not established a standard system for this industry. The product standard coverage rate has not reached 1X: for products that are not guaranteed, the four clauses cannot be fully implemented, and the requirements of industry or legal regulatory standards are not met. 2. If an enterprise has a major product quality, production safety, occupational health, environmental management and other accidents within two years and is notified or punished by the state or local government, 5. If the state or local quality supervision department conducts a random inspection of product quality and technical requirements and fails to meet the product standard requirements, the enterprise shall not apply for full quality standard system aging confirmation if any of the above items are found. E. The name of the parity group: Department (unit) Self-approval and approval Click to enter the enterprise early management inspection and see the business (joint name) Full name (first): Score after the clause1 (strand)
Relevant loom manufacturer
Registered address
Manufacturer address
Standardization department
Name of person
Enterprise technical personnel and
Shidong personnel
Purchase standard number
International standard
Execution standard control director
An Jixiang registration number
Return to foreign training standard
GiH/T 19273—2003
General number:
(station) urban area (county)
collection month process prosperous
color report number
enterprise logo city graduation system
evaluation machine all ministers)
note washing type city write the total economic nature, from state-owned, beauty, accumulation, joint-stock, etc., legal line write the enterprise from this line,: machine, cow, medium power metallurgy, chemical, construction finance, gold, light industry station dry agriculture north, poly service, etc., (GA/T 19273—2003
Year department (week position)
Evaluator's name
Evaluation documents
Inspection items and content
Enterprise standard parts system inspection record
Name of department head or post
Standardized parts
On-site inspection record
Form A, 3 Enterprise standard system self-evaluation report 25mm
Enterprise standard system self-evaluation report
Enterprise name||tt ||Evaluation length
Contact number
Evaluation date
XXXXXXXXX
Benefit cover)
CB/T19273—2003
297mml
CB/T19273—2003
No.:
Price increase date
Evaluation, core return
Detailed price guarantee
Not suitable for internal narrow
Red Zhenghe wine change fine full life to bear| |tt||Completion time
Table 4.3 (continued)
Enterprise self-evaluation report
Price cut-off period
Department responsible person
Date:
Two-level project
Standardized management
Technical standard system
Management standard system
Work standard system
Implementation and improvement
However, the score of each item
Whether the item is met
Evaluation method
Specified score
Table A.3 (general)
Enterprise self-evaluation score
Actual score
CB/T192732003
Score shows
E, the operation has not established a standard system for this industry. The product standard coverage rate has not reached 1X: for products that are not guaranteed, the four clauses cannot be fully implemented, and the requirements of industry or legal regulatory standards are not met. 2. If an enterprise has a major product quality, production safety, occupational health, environmental management and other accidents within two years and is notified or punished by the state or local government, 5. If the state or local quality supervision department conducts a random inspection of product quality and technical requirements and fails to meet the product standard requirements, the enterprise shall not apply for full quality standard system aging confirmation if any of the above items are found. E. The name of the parity group: Department (unit) Self-approval and approval Click to enter the enterprise early management inspection and see the business (joint name) Full name (first): Score after the clause1 (strand)
Relevant loom manufacturer
Registered address
Manufacturer address
Standardization department
Name of person
Enterprise technical personnel and
Shidong personnel
Purchase standard number
International standard
Execution standard control director
An Jixiang registration number
Return to foreign training standard
GiH/T 19273—2003
General number:
(station) urban area (county)
collection month process prosperous
color report number
enterprise logo city graduation system
evaluation machine all ministers)
note washing type city write the total economic nature, from state-owned, beauty, accumulation, joint-stock, etc., legal line write the enterprise from this line,: machine, cow, medium power metallurgy, chemical, construction finance, gold, light industry station dry agriculture north, poly service, etc., (GA/T 19273—2003
Year department (week position)
Evaluator's name
Evaluation documents
Inspection items and content
Enterprise standard parts system inspection record
Name of department head or post
Standardized parts
On-site inspection record
Form A, 3 Enterprise standard system self-evaluation report 25mm
Enterprise standard system self-evaluation report
Enterprise name||tt ||Evaluation length
Contact number
Evaluation date
XXXXXXXXX
Benefit cover)
CB/T19273—2003
297mml
CB/T19273—2003
No.:
Price increase date
Evaluation, core return
Detailed price guarantee
Not suitable for internal narrow
Red Zhenghe wine change fine full life to bear| |tt||Completion time
Table 4.3 (continued)
Enterprise self-evaluation report
Price cut-off period
Department responsible person
Date:
Two-level project
Standardized management
Technical standard system
Management standard system
Work standard system
Implementation and improvement
However, the score of each item
Whether the item is met
Evaluation method
Specified score
Table A.3 (general)
Enterprise self-evaluation score
Actual score
CB/T192732003
Score shows
E, the operation has not established a standard system for this industry. The product standard coverage rate has not reached 1X: for products that are not guaranteed, the four clauses cannot be fully implemented, and the requirements of industry or legal regulatory standards are not met. 2. If an enterprise has a major product quality, production safety, occupational health, environmental management and other accidents within two years and is notified or punished by the state or local government, 5. If the state or local quality supervision department conducts a random inspection of product quality and technical requirements and fails to meet the product standard requirements, the enterprise shall not apply for full quality standard system aging confirmation if any of the above items are found. E. The name of the parity group: Department (unit) Self-approval and approval Click to enter the enterprise early management inspection and approval (joint name) Full name (first): Score after the clause
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.