Guide to the choice of series of preferred numbers and of series containing more rounded values of preferred numbers
Some standard content:
1CS17.020
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
CB/T19764—2005/S0497:1973
Guidc to thie choice of series of preferred numbers tnd uf seriescontaining more rounded values of preferred nunmbers(IS0497.1973.11T)
Published on 2005-05-16
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China Administration of Standardization of the People's Republic of China
Implemented on 2005-12-01
CB/T 19764—2005/ISD 497:1973 This standard adopts the international standard S0497:179 preferred effective and preferred digital fast value system selection index 3 (Central version) for the lack of use, this standard makes the following changes to [SC)7: "international standard" is changed to "wooden standard", and the national standard is deleted:
According to GB/D 1.1-2)) standardization work guide, the structure and writing period of the standard are compiled. The non-material requirements are attached.
The standard is drafted by the National Product Size and Technical Specification Committee, and the reform units of this standard are: China Machinery Science Research Institute, China Machinery Production Center, Times Network Company, Harbin Product Door Factory, Beile Design and Inspection Science Research Institute.
The people who changed this standard are: +Xinling, Xuexiaojie, Tujia, Langhui, Guanxi. 1 Standard
GB/T19764—2005/1S0)497,1973 Guide for the selection of priority numbers and priority number value series This standard specifies the priority number standard for full production use - the value of the priority number, the use of the standard, divided into a series of small priority number values, this standard applies to the application of this fast position and the results of the use of this standard, this standard gives the rules for the correct selection between the priority number and the various constant values This standard is applicable to the actual situation and cannot be used when the priority number, as far as possible 1S017 Guidance on the selection and expansion of effective conditions for the use of values,
2 Normative references
The clauses in the listed documents become the clauses of this standard through reference in this standard. For any applicable document with a date, its subsequent amendments (excluding those to prevent errors) or revisions are not applicable to this standard. However, the parties who reach an agreement on whether to use the revised version of this document can do so according to the agreement reached by the parties. For any applicable document without a date, its latest version shall be used for this standard. GB/T82 gives priority number system (ISU3: 1973.1DT) EB/T9/5 Application Guide for priority numbers and priority number systems (1S0) 17: 1973, IDT3 Avoid priority number problems
3.1 Overview
Regardless of the various standards promoted in the production of drilling products, when the basic kinetic energy will be listed as a geometric series for each generation of dimensions, the use of priority number systems has advantages. 3.2 The best series
From the perspective of planning God 4, as well as the speed of the auxiliary value group, the performance of the best element is guaranteed to be accepted as much as possible,
3.3 Widely note the applicability
Prefer the method with the strongest material resistance to meet the overall medicinal requirements in a given rated or internal (motor power, pushing capacity, etc.).
3.4 Simplify technical and commercial calculations
The standard and commercial definition of the priority number is also the priority number, so it can be used to calculate the efficiency value instead of the priority number itself, and the series! Only inch, clothing price, etc.> According to the expansion ratio, multiplying the relative courtyard, the calculation is greatly simplified. 3.5 Convenient for conversion of measurement units
When the measurement unit value is optimal and the conversion factor is approximately the optimal number, it can be used to convert other measurement units. 4 Application of rounded values
4.1 Overview
Rounded values Rounded values are only used in certain situations. Rounded values should be used first. 4.2 In some certain occasions, the optimal number cannot be used for important reasons:) When the number to be used is not possible to obtain all the effective digits (the number of effective digits is not possible to obtain all the effective digits) For the number that needs to be called, the whole number and the items that require the effect of divisibility or addition, sometimes it is appropriate to use the rounded value ratio, for example, the combination of the size of the unit and the integer multiple of the weight is only one. CE/1:19764·2005/1SO 497:1973 Where tolerances are required, the number of significant digits of the optical number has no practical significance and is not easily quantified, and the rounded value series can be used. For example, the optical time of a photographic image is 1/30 to 1/31.5 seconds, and the 0/3 series [1.1.:2, 1/4.1/3.1/15, 1/x0, 1/60, 1/-25..-.--shift..3] is used. If the product range is limited by the existing material basis and the existing material basis is not easy to change (for example, considering the economical performance, the existing flash quantity is still fast), the rounded value series can be used. If the standard diameter is within the standard length series
4.4 within the important range (4.2), it can be considered that the rounded value series is appropriate. If economic and psychological factors are considered and a simpler form of expression is used, especially when there are reasons for reducing the use of numbers in the document), it is not necessary to use rounded values, because this may cause inconsistencies in corporate standards and national standards, which will have a great impact on international technical exchanges and product retention. International standards and technical documents are based on preferred numbers. The current national standards also use preferred numbers, which are consistent with international standards, but are not modern and advanced! To achieve consistency, if the state-when the public hopes to change the current system (such as physical constants! Introduce the interpersonal promotion and make these effective values approximate the optimal number or its rounded value, the department should not consider the "optimal number" of the optimal number as a "form of currency". This series cannot be used to illustrate the entire quality of the color of the first light teaching. The production day and month will have a shift, especially in the calculation detailed in 3.3. This also applies to the aforementioned difficult to change series of gear numbers. 5 Selection rules and rounded value series decay
5.1 Choose a typical effective value to meet the specific requirements of the type. 5.1.1 Select the appropriate ratio in the following order: 5 10--2043
5.1.2 Select the system with appropriate requirements and common ratio (see clothes:), that is: "Preferentially use the preferred number system itself (1 Note):) If there are sufficient reasons and the optimal light coagulation cannot be used at all, use the first value series R) and finally use the second value series.
) There are also items with appropriate product quality, and the value ratio is effective. There are also tests outside), the product series is limited to the range of products. Provide a small sample of the problem, test 3-4-7.
3, 5 +4. E-8,
7+7-14,
2>deep use of non-worry charging and discharge, also. Non-transformation of the sister, in order to be consistent with the current long-term standard rate that has not been replaced, or in order to establish a new replacement ratio to maintain the existing cattle production. Or in order to continue to use the existing work, and the soldiers, will bring certain reasons for the difficulty of the transformation of the park's international standards - the village's endurance will be complicated and can be manufactured according to the same number of columns, 2
efficiency index
recently contributed the common ratio
the common ratio of the large
unevenness ()
priority number!
1.42 5.37 1:.36 11.66bzxz.net
Relative error:
(1. 2)1.25
Table 1 Rounding value series
The first value
1, ae1,05
CH/119764—2005/x497.1373
Calculated
4, 25~32
1-,1512,94
The second rounding value series
The relative error between each term and the calculated position in each term in the series is (is)
5 ~ 40
16~ 40
5 and 10
6, :H - 1.96
1. 673 81.26
1.983 6+cT
1.
24|3.31 1
4, 217 0
5, 5i5R
I t, 32
+0, 44
+0, 75||tt| |4. h84. 5
5, :5
1 1. 19 : 5. 13
+:, 11
+0, +, 45|| tt||+0, 73
6. 687 10.25
. ty .:
. +5 6
a,449 5
4a' 1n,ro3 r
2R series with straight (square cabinet value), criminal extension 7,5 set people, store can be used after, in the case of transmission, when the double-stage spacing is not allowed \pin\(When the item position increases, the item difference and the drop are small>, the R'4n system effect allows 1.15 to be used as the rounded value of 1.18 and 20.00 to be used as the rounded value of .25, so as to construct or sequence: 1,1,2,1,17,1,15,1,25,1.3. In some special cases (such as flat blades), very high precision is required, and the calculation position can be used to calculate the Column) 3
GB/I19764—2C05/[50497:1973
5.2 In the selection of single low (column If the machine does not have a specific number of parameters, you should consider the value of the item in the system that may be sufficient for the common ratio, and choose a number with a given value of 5.1. Select the abbreviated value, 6 the harm of using the rounded value
6. "If there is a rounded value in the series, or a special feature that meets the requirements of the state is allowed to exist, the four are not preferred ~ , it is impossible to convert it into a series with a smaller common ratio. 6.2 The uniformity of the whole value series is better than that of the optical series, because the relative supply difference of the series in some intervals can reach 2.94, which is closer to R\ Series can reach 5, center 1%\.
6.3 Uniformity of derived series classification One long or R series blank class, false If you reverse the two adjacent items, for example, one downward and 5 upward; taking the 40/4 series (1.05) as an example, the relative error between 1.25 and 1.7 is 1.26% + 251% = 3.?7, while the original 40 series range is only 2.9 when the return difference is relatively large, and the acid also makes up for the system's performance. The precision of the 6.4-level value is not as good as the modern laser In fact, the reduction of the overall value can reach 2.1% in the K series and 5.3% in the R series. When calculating the numbers given in the fifth column of Table 1, the integer cannot be used to set
6.5 as the solution. If you choose the same integer value instead of the priority number, it will cause great difficulty in the coordination of the time.
3) Linearization The error of the integral value is: the area and the control of the lock number are 155, and the power of the three-dimensional power supply is 155. For the drink, it is greater than 2: the disk attachment
for the fifth power, it is greater than 2. The second inertia rule
23 see 2. Miscellaneous note 2),
4,1 definition
.1.1 Speed
Supplementary points
(Informative Appendix)
Production and ratio uniformity of item values
GB/T 19764—2005/ISQ 4971973 In order to use the chemical formula for the above-mentioned ring solution and the non-chemical formula, the calculation should be studied first. The relative value of the chemical formula relative to the theoretical value is called the index of the variable value. A1.2 The precision of the value of the item relative to the theoretical value can be expressed as a relative relationship described in percentage, using the ratio of the difference between the item and the theoretical value to the theoretical elimination. Ratio expression:
Priority and relative error are listed in the 8th column of Table 1 of GB/T3212J5 and are repeated in the 1st column of the table of this standard. The relative difference of the chemical value is listed in the vehicle mark Table 10, columns 8-11, A, 1.3 The difference between the actual common ratio (corresponding to the directivity of the state item) and the theoretical common ratio at a given point in a series of ratios is the difference between the actual common ratio at that point and the theoretical common ratio. White ratio represents\:||tt || According to the common ratio and the error of the two, the value of the item in the 7th to 11th column of Table 1 can be used to read the standard single algebraic subtraction to find the value (slightly larger than the left small amount!"||tt| |R, R, R\ The common ratio of each series at the last point is recorded in the current table 1. The lower column A.2 of the first to fourth columns is the maximum allowable error
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the chemical value on the consumption should be smaller than the error of the adjacent existing jade bolt town, the condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error. When it is approximately equal to 10 -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer terminal numbers can be close to 1 (based on the common ratio), but this is not allowed for the homogeneity of the series. | |tt||4.3 Actual error of calculated value
In the seventh column of 13321-200F to 1, the five valid digits of the calculated value are given. It is 0.0005 relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value. . The difference between the two cabinets is (.(48%, the actual error of the AL priority number
A, 4.1 in GB/32-·2035 is beyond the optimal light number with two significant figures, The first column lists the transmission data and the calculation time step efficiency of 6.5, and the range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining rubber is 1. The required item is: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru's position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0. o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E is C.0036E or 5.350, which is around 210C2. GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973 relative error.
A.4.2 The public output error does not exceed 1.23, while the fan pool error coupons are large: billion refers to the day, output - according to the image <that is, two The common ratio between the items; the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate continuous correction. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The single largest unevenness of the R system is 15|| tt||A,5 Actual error of the rounded value
A.5.1 The small fraction may be rounded only under special circumstances. Other instruments have two significant digits, and some even have only one. The effective characters are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 5.2 The deviation from the theoretical value is calculated by the deviation from the priority number (the maximum reading difference in the cells from the 7th to the 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of the R and R\ series is the priority series difference. Very needed, such as R\5. Most people are not due to hooking (see the last column of the first to fourth columns of Table 1> up to 5.37%, mRF only 1.2%, R10 up to 2.94%. mR40 only 1.15% A.5.3 It should be noted that the integer of the fast month is allowed in R5 or k\10: in the denser series, it is not allowed to use it, and the error of 1.5 relative to the ten-block is 5.36, which causes 5.60 with the continuous term, 3 sets % of the common ratio is relative to the error ticket. This is a good match for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the maximum allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed, so the convention is 1.12* In the R23 series, it causes a 63% relative error for the 1.8 continuous ticket, while the error for 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The obvious sign of R10 is 1.2. The difference of the same position is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. It takes 1.1F-half a minute to take effect. I point out that the sum of 1. + 1.- and 1.25 is 1.5m1, and the algebraic difference between the 7th and 1st positions described in A.1.2 is calculated, and the result is: + 6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can
also this structure continuous public with 1.089 heart machine.0423 representative of me theory.05-3449 5
4a'1n, ro3 r
2R series with straight (square cabinet value), criminal extension 7,5 set people, store can be used later, in the case of transmission, when the double-stage spacing is not sufficient to allow \ pin \ (item position increases, item difference and, drop small>, R'4n series effect allows 1.15 as 1.18 rounded value and 20.25 rounded value, to form or series: 1,1,2,1,17,1,15,1,25,1.3. In some special cases (such as flat blades), very high precision is required, and the calculation position can be used to enter the first column) 3
GB/I19764-2C05/[50497:1973
5.2 In the selection of single low (column If the number of detailed machines is not specified, it should be considered that the value may be sufficient for the items in the series with a common ratio in the future, and the ratio is called the string 5.1. A given value is selected. When there is no suitable value in the preferred rounding, the rounded value can be selected. 6. The harm of using the rounded value
6. "If there is a rounded value in the series, or a special feature that meets the requirements of the state exists, it is not a priority, and it is impossible to convert it into a series with a smaller common ratio. 6.2 The uniformity of the rounded value series classification is better than the numerical series, because the relative difference in some intervals can reach 2.94, and the R\ series can reach 5, and the center is 1%.
6.3 The uniformity of the derived series classification is a long or R series. If the series is empty, For example, if two adjacent items are reversed, one is downward and the other is upward; taking the 40/4 series (1.05) as an example, the relative error between 1.25 and 1.7 is 1.26% + 2.51% = 3.7, while the original 40 series range is only 2.9%, which also makes up for the principle of system compatibility. The precision of the 6.4 value is not as high as that of the original light. In fact, the reduction of the precision of the whole value can reach 2.1% in the K series and 5.3% in the R series. Moreover, due to the above situation, when the number given in the fifth column of Table 1 is to be calculated, the whole value cannot be solved by setting the product value of 6.5. If you choose the same rounded value instead of the priority number, it will be difficult to coordinate the pressure between the two standards.
3) The error of the rounded value of the linear scale is: the area and the control of the control area are 155, the product of the power is greater than 155, the product of the power is greater than 2: the product of the power is greater than 2. The inertia of the spring is greater than 2. See 2. Miscellaneous Note 2),
4,1 Definition
.1.1 Speed
Attached point
(Informative Appendix)
The product of the value and the uniformity of the ratio
GB/T 19764—2005/ISQ 4971973 In order to solve the above problems and to use chemical correction, the calculation should be studied first, and the relative accuracy and accuracy of chemical correction relative to the theoretical value should be called the index of variable value) and the accuracy of the common ratio of the corresponding series should be studied. A1.2 The accuracy of the value of the same item relative to the theoretical value can be expressed as a relative relationship described in percentage, expressed as the ratio of the difference between the item and the theoretical value to the theoretical elimination:
The relative error is listed in the eighth column of Table 1 of GB/T3212J5 and is listed in the eighth column of Table 1 of this standard. The relative difference of chemical correction values is listed in the eighth to eleventh columns of Table 10 of the standard. A1.3 The accuracy of a series of common ratios at a given point is expressed as the percentage between the actual common ratio (the vertical of the corresponding item) at that point and the theoretical common ratio: ||tt || According to the table, the error between the common ratio and the value of the product can be obtained by algebraic subtraction of the values given in the 7th to 11th columns of Table 1 (slightly larger than the left and right smaller amount!
R, R\ The common ratio of each series is recorded in the lower column A.2 of the 4th column of Table 1.
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the value should be smaller than the error of the adjacent current value, this condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error, and the common value can be approximately equal to 10 when the common ratio V1C is too large. -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer numbers can be close to 1 (with the common ratio value), which is not allowed for the uniformity of the series.
4.3 The actual error of the calculated value
In the 7th column of 13321-200F to 1, the five significant digits of the calculated value are listed. It is relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value of 0.0005. The actual error of the AL priority number
A,4.1 In GB/32-·2035, the preferred number with two significant digits is listed. The range between the transmitted number and the calculated value and the theoretical value is 6.5. The range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining 1. The required items and the error are: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0.o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E said the value of the degree is C.0036E or 5.350, around 210C2 ratio, GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973.
A.4.2 The error of the common value is not more than 1.23, and the error of the range is large: the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate rounding. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The actual error of the rounded value of the R system is 15
A,5.1 Only under special circumstances, the small fraction can be rounded. It has two effective digits, and some even have only one effective digit. However, it still maintains sufficient uniformity in R and \: \4. 5.2 The deviation of the rounded value from the theoretical value exceeds the maximum reading difference in the preferred series (note the maximum reading difference in the 7th to 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of R and R\ series is very different from the preferred series, such as R\5. The most common ratio (see the last column of the 1st to 4th columns of Table 1) is 5.37%, mRF is only 1.2%, R10 is 2.94%, and mR40 is only 1.15%. A.5.3 It should be noted that the rounded value of 1.5 relative to the theoretical value is 5.36, which causes a relative error of 5.60% with the continuous term 3. This is true for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed in the series with a common ratio of 1.12*R23. Because it causes a 63% error in the ratio of the subsequent ticket 1.8, while the allowable error of the quantity of 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The indication for R10 is that the error of 1.2 is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. The error of 1.1F- is half of the error of 1.1F-. The error of 1.5m1 is calculated by the algebraic difference of the 7th and 1.967th positions described in A.1.2, and the result is: +6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can also be represented by 1.089, 0.0423, 0.05-3 respectively.449 5
4a'1n, ro3 r
2R series with straight (square cabinet value), criminal extension 7,5 set people, store can be used later, in the case of transmission, when the double-stage spacing is not sufficient to allow \ pin \ (item position increases, item difference and, drop small>, R'4n series effect allows 1.15 as 1.18 rounded value and 20.25 rounded value, to form or series: 1,1,2,1,17,1,15,1,25,1.3. In some special cases (such as flat blades), very high precision is required, and the calculation position can be used to enter the first column) 3
GB/I19764-2C05/[50497:1973
5.2 In the selection of single low (column If the number of detailed machines is not specified, it should be considered that the value may be sufficient for the items in the series with a common ratio in the future, and the ratio is called the string 5.1. A given value is selected. When there is no suitable value in the preferred rounding, the rounded value can be selected. 6. The harm of using the rounded value
6. "If there is a rounded value in the series, or a special feature that meets the requirements of the state exists, it is not a priority, and it is impossible to convert it into a series with a smaller common ratio. 6.2 The uniformity of the rounded value series classification is better than the numerical series, because the relative difference in some intervals can reach 2.94, and the R\ series can reach 5, and the center is 1%.
6.3 The uniformity of the derived series classification is a long or R series. If the series is empty, For example, if two adjacent items are reversed, one is downward and the other is upward; taking the 40/4 series (1.05) as an example, the relative error between 1.25 and 1.7 is 1.26% + 2.51% = 3.7, while the original 40 series range is only 2.9%, which also makes up for the principle of system compatibility. The precision of the 6.4 value is not as high as that of the original light. In fact, the reduction of the precision of the whole value can reach 2.1% in the K series and 5.3% in the R series. Moreover, due to the above situation, when the number given in the fifth column of Table 1 is to be calculated, the whole value cannot be solved by setting the product value of 6.5. If you choose the same rounded value instead of the priority number, it will be difficult to coordinate the pressure between the two standards.
3) The error of the rounded value of the linear scale is: the area and the control of the control area are 155, the product of the power is greater than 155, the product of the power is greater than 2: the product of the power is greater than 2. The inertia of the spring is greater than 2. See 2. Miscellaneous Note 2),
4,1 Definition
.1.1 Speed
Attached point
(Informative Appendix)
The product of the value and the uniformity of the ratio
GB/T 19764—2005/ISQ 4971973 In order to solve the above problems and to use chemical correction, the calculation should be studied first, and the relative accuracy and accuracy of chemical correction relative to the theoretical value should be called the index of variable value) and the accuracy of the common ratio of the corresponding series should be studied. A1.2 The accuracy of the value of the same item relative to the theoretical value can be expressed as a relative relationship described in percentage, expressed as the ratio of the difference between the item and the theoretical value to the theoretical elimination:
The relative error is listed in the eighth column of Table 1 of GB/T3212J5 and is listed in the eighth column of Table 1 of this standard. The relative difference of chemical correction values is listed in the eighth to eleventh columns of Table 10 of the standard. A1.3 The accuracy of a series of common ratios at a given point is expressed as the percentage between the actual common ratio (the vertical of the corresponding item) at that point and the theoretical common ratio: ||tt || According to the table, the error between the common ratio and the value of the product can be obtained by algebraic subtraction of the values given in the 7th to 11th columns of Table 1 (slightly larger than the left and right smaller amount!
R, R\ The common ratio of each series is recorded in the lower column A.2 of the 4th column of Table 1.
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the value should be smaller than the error of the adjacent current value, this condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error, and the common value can be approximately equal to 10 when the common ratio V1C is too large. -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer numbers can be close to 1 (with the common ratio value), which is not allowed for the uniformity of the series.
4.3 The actual error of the calculated value
In the 7th column of 13321-200F to 1, the five significant digits of the calculated value are listed. It is relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value of 0.0005. The actual error of the AL priority number
A,4.1 In GB/32-·2035, the preferred number with two significant digits is listed. The range between the transmitted number and the calculated value and the theoretical value is 6.5. The range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining 1. The required items and the error are: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0.o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E said the value of the degree is C.0036E or 5.350, around 210C2 ratio, GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973.
A.4.2 The error of the common value is not more than 1.23, and the error of the range is large: the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate rounding. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The actual error of the rounded value of the R system is 15
A,5.1 Only under special circumstances, the small fraction can be rounded. It has two effective digits, and some even have only one effective digit. However, it still maintains sufficient uniformity in R and \: \4. 5.2 The deviation of the rounded value from the theoretical value exceeds the maximum reading difference in the preferred series (note the maximum reading difference in the 7th to 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of R and R\ series is very different from the preferred series, such as R\5. The most common ratio (see the last column of the 1st to 4th columns of Table 1) is 5.37%, mRF is only 1.2%, R10 is 2.94%, and mR40 is only 1.15%. A.5.3 It should be noted that the rounded value of 1.5 relative to the theoretical value is 5.36, which causes a relative error of 5.60% with the continuous term 3. This is true for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed in the series with a common ratio of 1.12*R23. Because it causes a 63% error in the ratio of the subsequent ticket 1.8, while the allowable error of the quantity of 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The indication for R10 is that the error of 1.2 is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. The error of 1.1F- is half of the error of 1.1F-. The error of 1.5m1 is calculated by the algebraic difference of the 7th and 1.967th positions described in A.1.2, and the result is: +6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can also be represented by 1.089, 0.0423, 0.05-3 respectively.2 The uniformity of the grading of the value series is better than that of the numerical series, because the relative error of the series in this range can reach 2.94, and the R series can reach 5.1%.
6.3 The uniformity of the grading of the derived series is similar to that of the R series. For example, if two adjacent items are reversed, for example, one downward and one upward; taking the 40/4 series (1.05) as an example, the relative error between 1.25 and 1.7 is 1.26%+251%=3.7, while the original 40 series has a relative error of only 2.9, which also meets the principle of uniformity of the numerical series. The precision of the 6.4 value is not as high as that of the modern optical system. In fact, the reduction in the precision of the rounding value can reach 2.1% in the K series and 5.3% in the R series. Moreover, due to the above situation, when the number given in the fifth column of Table 1 is to be calculated, the rounding value cannot be used. The product setting of 6.5 is used to solve the problem. If the same rounding value column is selected instead of the priority number, it will cause great difficulties in the coordination of the internal standard.
3) The error of the linear scale integer value is the error of the setting and maintenance of the design: for the modified person in 155 lock area and the control of the property, the product of the power is greater than 2: the disk attachment is greater than 2. The fifth power is greater than 2. The inertia specification is
23 See 2. Miscellaneous Note 2),
4,1 Definition
.1.1 Speed
Attached points
(Informative Appendix)
The product of the items and the uniformity of the ratio
GB/T 19764—2005/ISQ 4971973 In order to solve the above problems and to use chemical correction carefully, we should first study the calculation, the relative accuracy and the relative degree of chemical correction relative to the theoretical value (the relative degree of the variable value) and the common ratio of the corresponding series. A1.2 The accuracy of the value of the same item relative to the theoretical value can be expressed as a relative relationship described in percentage, expressed as the ratio of the difference between the item and the theoretical value to the theoretical elimination:
The relative error is listed in the 8th column of Table 1 of GB/T3212J5 and is listed in the 1st column of the table of this standard. The relative difference of the chemical value is listed in the 8th to 11th columns of Table 10 of the standard. A1.3 The relative error of a series of common ratios at a given point is expressed as the percentage between the actual common ratio (the vertical of the corresponding item) at that point and the theoretical common ratio: ||tt || According to the table, the error between the common ratio and the value of the product can be obtained by algebraic subtraction of the values given in the 7th to 11th columns of Table 1 (slightly larger than the left and right smaller amount!
R, R\ The common ratio of each series is recorded in the lower column A.2 of the 4th column of Table 1.
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the value should be smaller than the error of the adjacent current value, this condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error, and the common value can be approximately equal to 10 when the common ratio V1C is too large. -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer numbers can be close to 1 (with the common ratio value), which is not allowed for the uniformity of the series.
4.3 The actual error of the calculated value
In the 7th column of 13321-200F to 1, the five significant digits of the calculated value are listed. It is relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value of 0.0005. The actual error of the AL priority number
A,4.1 In GB/32-·2035, the preferred number with two significant digits is listed. The range between the transmitted number and the calculated value and the theoretical value is 6.5. The range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining 1. The required items and the error are: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0.o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E said the value of the degree is C.0036E or 5.350, around 210C2 ratio, GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973.
A.4.2 The error of the common value is not more than 1.23, and the error of the range is large: the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate corrections. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The actual error of the rounded value of the R system is 15
A,5.1 Only under special circumstances, the small fraction can be rounded, and the report has two effective digits, and some even have only one effective digit. However, the surface still maintains sufficient uniformity in R and \: \4. 5.2 The deviation of the rounded value from the theoretical value exceeds the maximum reading difference in the preferred series (note the maximum reading difference in the 7th to 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of R and R\ series is very different from the preferred series, such as R\5. The most common ratio (see the last column of the 1st to 4th columns of Table 1) is 5.37%, mRF is only 1.2%, R10 is 2.94%, and mR40 is only 1.15%. A.5.3 It should be noted that the rounded value of 1.5 relative to the theoretical value is 5.36, which causes a relative error of 5.60% with the continuous term 3. This is true for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed in the series with a common ratio of 1.12*R23. Because it causes a 63% error in the ratio of the subsequent ticket 1.8, while the allowable error of the quantity of 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The indication for R10 is that the error of 1.2 is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. The error of 1.1F- is half of the error of 1.1F-. The error of 1.5m1 is calculated by the algebraic difference of the 7th and 1.967th positions described in A.1.2, and the result is: +6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can also be represented by 1.089, 0.0423, 0.05-3 respectively.2 The uniformity of the grading of the value series is better than that of the numerical series, because the relative error of the series in this range can reach 2.94, and the R series can reach 5.1%.
6.3 The uniformity of the grading of the derived series is similar to that of the R series. For example, if two adjacent items are reversed, for example, one downward and one upward; taking the 40/4 series (1.05) as an example, the relative error between 1.25 and 1.7 is 1.26%+251%=3.7, while the original 40 series has a relative error of only 2.9, which also meets the principle of uniformity of the numerical series. The precision of the 6.4 value is not as high as that of the modern optical system. In fact, the reduction in the precision of the rounding value can reach 2.1% in the K series and 5.3% in the R series. Moreover, due to the above situation, when the number given in the fifth column of Table 1 is to be calculated, the rounding value cannot be used. The product setting of 6.5 is used to solve the problem. If the same rounding value column is selected instead of the priority number, it will cause great difficulties in the coordination of the internal standard.
3) The error of the linear scale integer value is the error of the setting and maintenance of the design: for the modified person in 155 lock area and the control of the property, the product of the power is greater than 2: the disk attachment is greater than 2. The fifth power is greater than 2. The inertia specification is
23 See 2. Miscellaneous Note 2),
4,1 Definition
.1.1 Speed
Attached points
(Informative Appendix)
The product of the items and the uniformity of the ratio
GB/T 19764—2005/ISQ 4971973 In order to solve the above problems and to use chemical correction carefully, we should first study the calculation, the relative accuracy and the relative degree of chemical correction relative to the theoretical value (the relative degree of the variable value) and the common ratio of the corresponding series. A1.2 The accuracy of the value of the same item relative to the theoretical value can be expressed as a relative relationship described in percentage, expressed as the ratio of the difference between the item and the theoretical value to the theoretical elimination:
The relative error is listed in the 8th column of Table 1 of GB/T3212J5 and is listed in the 1st column of the table of this standard. The relative difference of the chemical value is listed in the 8th to 11th columns of Table 10 of the standard. A1.3 The relative error of a series of common ratios at a given point is expressed as the percentage between the actual common ratio (the vertical of the corresponding item) at that point and the theoretical common ratio: ||tt || According to the table, the error between the common ratio and the value of the product can be obtained by algebraic subtraction of the values given in the 7th to 11th columns of Table 1 (slightly larger than the left and right smaller amount!
R, R\ The common ratio of each series is recorded in the lower column A.2 of the 4th column of Table 1.
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the value should be smaller than the error of the adjacent current value, this condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error, and the common value can be approximately equal to 10 when the common ratio V1C is too large. -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer numbers can be close to 1 (with the common ratio value), which is not allowed for the uniformity of the series.
4.3 The actual error of the calculated value
In the 7th column of 13321-200F to 1, the five significant digits of the calculated value are listed. It is relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value of 0.0005. The actual error of the AL priority number
A,4.1 In GB/32-·2035, the preferred number with two significant digits is listed. The range between the transmitted number and the calculated value and the theoretical value is 6.5. The range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining 1. The required items and the error are: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0.o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E said the value of the degree is C.0036E or 5.350, around 210C2 ratio, GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973.
A.4.2 The error of the common value is not more than 1.23, and the error of the range is large: the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate rounding. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The actual error of the rounded value of the R system is 15
A,5.1 Only under special circumstances, the small fraction can be rounded. It has two effective digits, and some even have only one effective digit. However, it still maintains sufficient uniformity in R and \: \4. 5.2 The deviation of the rounded value from the theoretical value exceeds the maximum reading difference in the preferred series (note the maximum reading difference in the 7th to 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of R and R\ series is very different from the preferred series, such as R\5. The most common ratio (see the last column of the 1st to 4th columns of Table 1) is 5.37%, mRF is only 1.2%, R10 is 2.94%, and mR40 is only 1.15%. A.5.3 It should be noted that the rounded value of 1.5 relative to the theoretical value is 5.36, which causes a relative error of 5.60% with the continuous term 3. This is true for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed in the series with a common ratio of 1.12*R23. Because it causes a 63% error in the ratio of the subsequent ticket 1.8, while the allowable error of the quantity of 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The indication for R10 is that the error of 1.2 is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. The error of 1.1F- is half of the error of 1.1F-. The error of 1.5m1 is calculated by the algebraic difference of the 7th and 1.967th positions described in A.1.2, and the result is: +6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can also be represented by 1.089, 0.0423, 0.05-3 respectively.3 The common ratio of a series at a given point is expressed as the difference between the actual common ratio (corresponding to the direct error of the item) at that point and the theoretical common ratio:
According to the table, the error between the common ratio and the theoretical common ratio can be calculated by algebraic subtraction of the values given in the 7th to 11th columns of Table 1 (slightly larger than the left and right).
R, R, R\ The common ratios of each series at different points are recorded in the lower column A.2 of the 4th to 5th columns of Table 1.
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the value should be smaller than the error of the adjacent actual value, this condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error. The common ratio can be approximately equal to 10 when the common ratio V1C is too large. -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer numbers can be close to 1 (with the common ratio value), which is not allowed for the uniformity of the series.
4.3 The actual error of the calculated value
In the 7th column of 13321-200F to 1, the five significant digits of the calculated value are listed. It is relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value of 0.0005. The actual error of the AL priority number
A,4.1 In GB/32-·2035, the preferred number with two significant digits is listed. The range between the transmitted number and the calculated value and the theoretical value is 6.5. The range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining 1. The required items and the error are: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0.o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E said the value of the degree is C.0036E or 5.350, around 210C2 ratio, GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973.
A.4.2 The error of the common value is not more than 1.23, and the error of the range is large: the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate rounding. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The actual error of the rounded value of the R system is 15
A,5.1 Only under special circumstances, the small fraction can be rounded. It has two effective digits, and some even have only one effective digit. However, it still maintains sufficient uniformity in R and \: \4. 5.2 The deviation of the rounded value from the theoretical value exceeds the maximum reading difference in the preferred series (note the maximum reading difference in the 7th to 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of R and R\ series is very different from the preferred series, such as R\5. The most common ratio (see the last column of the 1st to 4th columns of Table 1) is 5.37%, mRF is only 1.2%, R10 is 2.94%, and mR40 is only 1.15%. A.5.3 It should be noted that the rounded value of 1.5 relative to the theoretical value is 5.36, which causes a relative error of 5.60% with the continuous term 3. This is true for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed in the series with a common ratio of 1.12*R23. Because it causes a 63% error in the ratio of the subsequent ticket 1.8, while the allowable error of the quantity of 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The indication for R10 is that the error of 1.2 is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. The error of 1.1F- is half of the error of 1.1F-. The error of 1.5m1 is calculated by the algebraic difference of the 7th and 1.967th positions described in A.1.2, and the result is: +6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can also be represented by 1.089, 0.0423, 0.05-3 respectively.3 The common ratio of a series at a given point is expressed as the difference between the actual common ratio (corresponding to the direct error of the item) at that point and the theoretical common ratio:
According to the table, the error between the common ratio and the theoretical common ratio can be calculated by algebraic subtraction of the values given in the 7th to 11th columns of Table 1 (slightly larger than the left and right).
R, R, R\ The common ratios of each series at different points are recorded in the lower column A.2 of the 4th to 5th columns of Table 1.
A.2.1 If such a condition is given, that is, the error of the value should be smaller than the error of the adjacent actual value, this condition can be expressed by the maximum allowable error. The common ratio can be approximately equal to 10 when the common ratio V1C is too large. -:
A,2.2 In the extreme span condition, the ratio between the inner and outer numbers can be close to 1 (with the common ratio value), which is not allowed for the uniformity of the series.
4.3 The actual error of the calculated value
In the 7th column of 13321-200F to 1, the five significant digits of the calculated value are listed. It is relative to the maximum value of the theoretical value of 0.0005. The actual error of the AL priority number
A,4.1 In GB/32-·2035, the preferred number with two significant digits is listed. The range between the transmitted number and the calculated value and the theoretical value is 6.5. The range between the calculated value and the theoretical value is 50x%-+1.8%
; For example, in R4C, the remaining 1. The required items and the error are: 1.
Chuang..6 and ru position I:
29-.039 31--
. r.--0 94
1. :. 0.o. 13
The exact value of the 1.92E said the value of the degree is C.0036E or 5.350, around 210C2 ratio, GB/1 19764—2006/ISn 497.1973.
A.4.2 The error of the common value is not more than 1.23, and the error of the range is large: the principle of uniformity is achieved by using appropriate rounding. The effective common ratio is still very close to the theoretical common ratio! The actual error of the rounded value of the R system is 15
A,5.1 Only under special circumstances, the small fraction can be rounded. It has two effective digits, and some even have only one effective digit. However, it still maintains sufficient uniformity in R and \: \4. 5.2 The deviation of the rounded value from the theoretical value exceeds the maximum reading difference in the preferred series (note the maximum reading difference in the 7th to 10th columns of Table 1). The common ratio of R and R\ series is very different from the preferred series, such as R\5. The most common ratio (see the last column of the 1st to 4th columns of Table 1) is 5.37%, mRF is only 1.2%, R10 is 2.94%, and mR40 is only 1.15%. A.5.3 It should be noted that the rounded value of 1.5 relative to the theoretical value is 5.36, which causes a relative error of 5.60% with the continuous term 3. This is true for the R\1 series with a common ratio of 1. Because according to A.2.1[\10, the allowable error is 12,D%, but the value of 1.5 cannot be guaranteed in the series with a common ratio of 1.12*R23. Because it causes a 63% error in the ratio of the subsequent ticket 1.8, while the allowable error of the quantity of 1\20 is only 6.1%.
>41.1% The indication for R10 is that the error of 1.2 is +6.67%, while the error of 1.13 is 0.11%. The error of 1.1F- is half of the error of 1.1F-. The error of 1.5m1 is calculated by the algebraic difference of the 7th and 1.967th positions described in A.1.2, and the result is: +6, 67+1,967,
. and 1.1 to
1.251.2 can also be represented by 1.089, 0.0423, 0.05-3 respectively.
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.