This standard specifies the basic method for evaluating the quality of meteorological services for decision-making. This standard applies to the evaluation of the quality of meteorological services for decision-making. QX/T 112-2010 Method for evaluating the quality of meteorological services for decision-making QX/T112-2010 Standard download decompression password: www.bzxz.net
This standard specifies the basic method for evaluating the quality of meteorological services for decision-making. This standard applies to the evaluation of the quality of meteorological services for decision-making.

ICS07.060
Meteorological Industry Standard of the People's Republic of China
QX/T112—2010
Quality evaluation method of decision-making meteorological service
Quality evaluation method of decision-making meteorological service2010-01-20Issued
China Meteorological Administration
Implemented on 2010-06-01
Terms and definitions
.........
Quality evaluation of decision-making meteorological service
Evaluation factorswww.bzxz.net
.........
Quality evaluation of decision-making meteorological service
QX/T112—2010
This standard is proposed and managed by the National Technical Committee for Standardization of Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation (SAC/TC345). The drafting unit of this standard is the National Meteorological Center. The drafters of this standard are Zhang Jianzhong, Tian Cuiying, Wang Weiguo, and Zhao Xiulan. QX/T112—2010
1 Scope
Quality assessment methods for decision-making meteorological services
This standard specifies the basic quality assessment methods for decision-making meteorological services. This standard applies to the quality assessment of decision-making meteorological services. 2 Terms and definitions
The following terms and definitions apply to this standard. 2.1
Decision-making meteorological serviceQX/T112—2010
Meteorological information services provided for decision-making departments to make scientific decisions on economic development plans, direct production, organize disaster prevention and mitigation, respond to climate change, rationally develop and utilize resources, protect the environment, and ensure major social activities, major engineering construction, military and national defense construction, etc. 2.2
Internal evaluation
Evaluation of the decision-making meteorological services of their departments by the functional competent departments. 2.3
External evaluation userevaluation
User evaluation of the Party and government decision-making departments when receiving decision-making meteorological services or using decision-making meteorological service products. 3 Decision-making meteorological service quality evaluation
3.1 Evaluation factors
There are seven evaluation factors for decision-making meteorological services. There are four internal evaluation factors: pertinence, sensitivity, comprehensiveness, and timeliness; there are three external evaluation factors: number of publications, number of instructions, and number of criticisms. The two evaluations are independent evaluations from different perspectives and complement each other. 3.2 Decision-making meteorological service quality evaluation
3.2.1 Calculation method
Taking into account the internal and external evaluations, the formula for calculating the quality of decision-making meteorological services is as follows: S=X+Y
Where:
S——Decision-making meteorological service quality evaluation score; X———Internal evaluation score for a period of time;
Y—Internal and external evaluation scores for the same period;
In 1, In 2——Weight coefficients. = En2 = 0.5. 3.2.2 Internal evaluation
The functional department of decision-making meteorological service work shall evaluate the four factors of pertinence (A), sensitivity (B), comprehensiveness (C) and timeliness (D). These four factors are determined by the scores of the decision-making service department, and the scores are based on a 10-point system. The ratio of the cumulative actual score to the number of services provided is the evaluation score of the functional department. The calculation formula is as follows: 1Z(an A; + azB +as C, +a, D,)X=
Where:
·(2)
QX/T112—2010
The evaluation score of the functional department providing n decision-making services within a period of time. The total number of decision-making meteorological services provided;
i——The number of decision-making meteorological services provided (i=1,2,3..) A, B, C, D
The score of each decision-making service work by the functional department, with a full score of 10 points; is the coefficient. α1=α2=α=α=0.25. 3.2.2.1 Targetedness (A)
Grasp the essence of the meteorological event itself and its impact, analyze and evaluate it, and put forward practical and effective solutions or suggestions. 3.2.2.2 Sensitivity (B)
Pay attention to national security, public resources and social needs, keenly grasp service hotspots, and take the initiative to carry out decision-making meteorological services. 3.2.2.3 Comprehensiveness (C)
Fully consider the needs of services in various aspects such as the country, society, economy, and development, express the theme and content in a popular and objective manner, accurately explain meteorological principles and concepts, and comprehensively propose scientific analysis and suggestions based on relevant information. 3.2.2.4 Timeliness (D)
When monitoring and predicting that meteorological conditions may or will have a major impact on national security, economic and social development, and the safety of people’s lives and property, timely grasp the service opportunities and provide decision-making meteorological services within the maximum benefit period. 3.2.3 External evaluation
The three external evaluation indicators are the number of publications in the relevant publications of the party and government decision-making departments, the number of instructions from the party and government leaders, and the number of criticisms from the party and government leaders. The calculation method is as follows: the number of citations (M), the number of instructions from the party and government leaders (N), and the number of criticisms from the party and government leaders (P) in the relevant publications of the party and government decision-making departments are multiplied by the corresponding parameters, i.e., the weight score, and the total score is accumulated over a period of time. The ratio of the accumulated actual total score to the number of times the product is provided is the evaluation of the decision-making department.
In the formula:
Calculation formula is as follows:
(βM+βN+βP)
Decision-making user evaluation score within a certain period of time
Number of times the decision-making service products are cited, forwarded and commissioned by the publications of the party and government departments; N——Number of times the decision-making service products and work are written (orally) approved, praised and commended by the party and government leaders; P——Number of times the decision-making service products and work are written (orally) criticized by the party and government leaders; β, e, β——coefficient angle = 6; p—10; B=—10. · (3)
The decision-making department selects information to provide a basis for decision-making, referring to the results in recent years, and the scoring coefficient is 6; approval is the best positive benefit of decision-making services, and the scoring coefficient is 10; criticism is the worst benefit, and the scoring coefficient is -10. In the service process, the approval and praise are not counted repeatedly, and the highest scoring item is calculated.
People's Republic of China
Meteorological Industry Standard
Decision-making Meteorological Service Quality Assessment Method
QX/T112—2010
Published and distributed by Meteorological Press
No. 46, Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing Postal Code: 100081
Website: http://www.cmp.cma.gov.cn Issuing Department: 010-68409198
Printed by Beijing Jingke Printing Co., Ltd.| |tt||Distributed by Xinhua Bookstores in various places
Format: 880×1230
First edition in May 2010
Printing sheet: 0.75 words; 22.5 thousand words
First printing in May 2010
Book number: 135029-5459
If there is any printing error
The publishing department of our company will replace it
Copyright reserved
Infringement will be investigated
Report phone number: (010)68406301
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.