GB/T 23793-2017 Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Specification GB/T23793-2017 |tt||Standard compression package decompression password: www.bzxz.net
This standard specifies the content of qualified supplier credit evaluation, credit rating and expression method, evaluation process, evaluation report writing requirements, and credit evaluation data, information filing and confidentiality. ?This standard applies to public procurement and can be used as a reference for non-public procurement.

ICS03.080.99
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
GB/T23793—2017
Replaces GB/T23793—2009
Trustworthiness assessment norms for qualified suppliers2017-07-31 release
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China China National Standardization Administration
2017-11-01 implementation
normative reference documents
terms and definitions
evaluation content and indicators
credit rating and symbol definition
evaluation process
report writing
evaluation information management
Appendix A (normative appendix)
references
qualified supplier credit evaluation special indicators and instructions GB/T23793-2017
Hii KAoNhi KAca
HiiKAoNiKAca
This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T1.1-2009. GB/T23793—2017
This standard replaces GB/T23793—2009 "Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Specification". Compared with GB/T23793—2009, the main technical changes are as follows!
--The scope of application of the standard has been modified (see Chapter 1, Chapter 1 of the 2009 edition); normative references have been added (see Chapter 2, Chapter 2 of the 2009 edition); the definition of "qualified supplier" has been modified (see 3.1, 3.1 of the 2009 edition); the terms and definitions of "credit evaluation", "commissioned credit evaluation" and "active credit evaluation" have been added (see 3.2, 3.4 and 3.5); the terms and definitions of "evaluation object" have been deleted (3.3 of the 2009 edition); the evaluation content has been modified (see 4.1, 4.1 of the 2009 edition); the evaluation process has been modified (see Chapter 6, Chapter 6 of the 2009 edition). Please note that some of the contents of this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document does not assume the responsibility for identifying these patents. This standard was proposed and coordinated by the National Social Credit Standardization Technical Committee (SAC/TC470). The drafting unit of this standard: China National Institute of Standardization. Zhongdaxin (Beijing) Credit Evaluation Center Co., Ltd., Anhui Huadian Cable Group Co., Ltd., Shandong Zhuxin Enterprise Credit Co., Ltd., Shiheng Special Steel Group Co., Ltd., Beijing Xingou Credit Management Co., Ltd., Liaoning Provincial Institute of Standardization, Fujian Anjing Food Co., Ltd., Shandong Provincial Institute of Standardization, Zhongshi Chengxin Credit Evaluation Co., Ltd., Xinjiang Institute of Standardization, Jiashan County Xinliangyou Shell Carving Crafts Factory, Xiamen Yongmei Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., Taixing Shuanghuan Clothing Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Xincheng Button Jewelry Co., Ltd., Foshan Shunde District Quality and Technical Supervision Standards and Coding Institute, Shandong Oriental Ocean Technology Co., Ltd., Yantai Technical Supervision Information Institute, Yantai Dawei Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Gou Acceleration Technology Co., Ltd. The main drafters of this standard are: Zhou Li, Lin Zhusheng, Li Xianghua, Jiang Zhou, Song Liang, Wang Changsheng, Sun Yi, Yu Youjin, Lv Yanyan, Chen Quan, Chen Yue, Zhao Yan, Meng Cuizhu, Yang Wenjun, Luo Yongzong, Sun Liangquan, Sun Ying, Ma Long, Guo Xinfeng, Gu Qiming, Yang Jun, Chen Ji, Li Junsheng, Nie Yusheng, Bao Huanling, Wang Shuwei, Chen Lei.
The previous versions of the standards replaced by this standard are: -GB/T23793—2009.
HiiKAoNhiKAca
GB/T23793—2017
The credit status of suppliers directly affects the supply quality and efficiency of goods (services). Therefore, evaluating the credit status of suppliers and implementing credit risk control on suppliers through the evaluation results is not only of great significance to the purchaser, but also of reference value to government regulatory authorities. At present, most government procurement supervision departments and procurement agencies at all levels have established internal supplier management systems, but the degree of attention paid to the credit status of suppliers, the inspection methods and results are not ideal, and suppliers' dishonest behavior still occurs from time to time. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the purchaser, ensure the safety of public funds, improve the efficiency and sustainability of public procurement, ensure the needs of socialization of emergency material reserves, and build an honest and trustworthy market environment, it is very necessary to establish a standardized credit evaluation mechanism for qualified suppliers. Based on GB/T23793-2009 "Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Specification", this standard expands the scope of application of the standard to all levels and types of public procurement, and at the same time modifies and improves the credit evaluation indicators. In addition to considering the common indicators of enterprise credit evaluation, the credit evaluation of qualified suppliers should also be evaluated from special indicators that meet the credit characteristics of qualified suppliers. Based on the basic common indicators proposed in GB/T23794-2015 "Enterprise Credit Evaluation Indicators", combined with the credit characteristics of the supplier itself, this standard proposes special indicators for qualified supplier credit evaluation from the aspects of comprehensive quality, financial strength, sustainable supply capacity, development potential, transaction credit, and social responsibility, aiming to provide technical guidance for the credit evaluation of qualified suppliers. IV
HiKAoNhiKAca
1 Scope
Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Specification
GB/T23793—2017
This standard specifies the content of qualified supplier credit evaluation, credit rating and expression method, evaluation process, evaluation report writing requirements, and credit evaluation data, information filing and confidentiality. This standard applies to public procurement and can be used as a reference for non-public procurement. 2 Normative References
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For any dated referenced document, only the dated version applies to this document. For any undated referenced document, the latest version (including all amendments) applies to this document. GB/T22116 Method for expressing enterprise credit rating GB/T22117 Basic credit terms
GB/T23794
Enterprise credit evaluation indicators
3 Terms and definitions
GB/T22116. The terms and definitions defined in GB/T22117 and GB/T23794 and the following terms and definitions apply to this document. 3.1
Qualified supplier
qualifiedsupplier
Supplier organization or individual whose professional conditions meet the requirements of the purchaser. Note: For some fields, professional conditions also include specific qualification requirements. 3.2
Credit evaluation
trustworthiness assessment
Integrity evaluation
The activity of recording, analyzing and evaluating the integrity of the credit subject in a certain period of time, and marking its integrity with specific symbols. Note: In this standard, it specifically refers to the activities of professional institutions to conduct comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the performance willingness, ability and behavior of various market participants in accordance with specific methods and procedures, and to express their credit ratings with standardized symbols. The scope of performance includes the content of social responsibilities stipulated by laws, regulations and mandatory standards, clearly agreed upon in contracts such as contract terms, and reasonable expectations of society. 3.3
assessment subject
assessment subject
Credit service institutions or other organizations that meet relevant requirements and engage in credit evaluation. 3.4
Commissioned credit evaluation
solicited trustworthinessassessmentPassive credit evaluation
Credit evaluation that accepts commissioned applications.
unsolicited trustworthiness assessmentActive credit evaluation
Credit evaluation that is not commissioned or agreed by the assessed entity. 1
HiiKAoNhiKAca
GB/T23793—2017
4 Evaluation content and indicators
4.1 Evaluation content
Qualified supplier credit evaluation content includes basic indicators and special indicators. Basic indicators are shown in GB/T23794, and special indicators include but are not limited to:
Comprehensive quality:
Financial strength
-Sustainable supply capacity;
-Development potential;
Transaction credit:
-Social responsibility.
4.2 Indicators
Indicator item names and descriptions are shown in Appendix A.
Credit rating and symbol definitions
5.1 The credit rating and expression method of qualified suppliers shall comply with the provisions of GB/T22116. 5.2 The credit rating of qualified suppliers includes AAA, AA, A and BBB. a) AAA: Qualified suppliers have strong willingness and ability to perform their contracts, excellent performance, and extremely low credit risk. b) AA: Qualified suppliers have strong willingness and ability to perform their contracts, very good performance, and very low credit risk. c) A: Qualified suppliers have strong willingness and ability to perform their contracts, good performance, and low credit risk. d) BBB: Qualified suppliers have average willingness and ability to perform their contracts, average performance, and average credit risk. 5.3 When the credit rating of the evaluation object does not reach BBB or above, it is marked with NR. Note: NR means unrated, which is a commonly used method of expressing credit ratings. 6 Evaluation Process
6.1 General
6.1.1 The evaluation subject should avoid conflicts of interest and ensure that the credit evaluation process and results are fair and just. 6.1.2 Credit evaluation is divided into commissioned credit evaluation and active credit evaluation, which generally includes: a) Commissioned credit evaluation process: application acceptance, preliminary evaluation, grade determination, grade notification, re-evaluation (when objections are raised), result release, and result tracking:
b) Active credit evaluation process: preliminary evaluation, grade determination, result release, and result tracking. 6.2
Commissioned credit evaluation
Application acceptance
After receiving the evaluation application and passing the review, the evaluation subject shall sign a legal entrustment agreement on the basis of avoiding conflicts of interest. 6.2.2 Preliminary evaluation
The evaluation subject shall organize personnel to form a credit evaluation project team based on the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest, as well as industry division of labor and professional background. The number of personnel in the project team should be more than 2, and 1 person in charge should be clearly identified. GB/T23793—2017
The project team shall conduct a comprehensive analysis of the evaluated object according to certain evaluation rules, write an evaluation report, and propose a credit rating recommendation for the evaluated object.
6.2.3 Rating Determination
The evaluation subject shall set up a credit review committee, which shall be composed of more than 3 (should be an odd number) relevant professionals. The credit review committee shall review the credit evaluation report and related materials submitted by the project team, and put forward review opinions to determine the credit rating of the evaluated object.
When the credit review committee cannot determine the credit level, it shall suspend the work of the credit review committee and feedback the information to the project team to reorganize and verify the relevant data until the credit review committee can determine the credit rating. 6.2.4 Rating Notification
The evaluation subject shall inform the evaluated object of the credit rating results. If there is any objection, the evaluated object may apply for re-evaluation. 6.2.5 Re-evaluation
Based on the supplementary materials submitted by the evaluated object, the credit review committee shall decide whether to re-organize the re-evaluation, re-examine, and determine the final result.
Note: There is only one chance for re-evaluation.
6.2.6 Results Release
The evaluation subject shall release the credit evaluation results and related contents in accordance with national laws, regulations and relevant requirements, as well as the provisions of the entrustment agreement. 6.2.7 Results Tracking
After the credit evaluation results are released, the evaluation subject shall conduct regular or irregular tracking in accordance with the provisions of the entrustment agreement and update the evaluation results in a timely manner.
6.3 Active Credit Evaluation
6.3.1 Preliminary Evaluation
On the basis of complying with the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest, the evaluation subject shall select the object to be evaluated and establish a credit evaluation project team based on the division of industry and professional background. The number of project team members should be more than 2. The project team shall adopt effective data acquisition methods, conduct a comprehensive analysis of the object to be evaluated based on the credit information of the object to be evaluated, and according to certain evaluation rules, write an evaluation report, and make recommendations on the credit rating of the object to be evaluated. 6.3.2 Determination of grade
The evaluation subject shall set up a credit review committee, which shall preferably consist of more than 3 (should be an odd number) relevant professionals. The credit review committee shall review the credit evaluation report and related materials submitted by the project team and put forward review opinions to determine the credit grade of the evaluation object.
When the credit review committee is unable to determine the credit grade, it shall suspend the work of the credit review committee and feedback the information to the project team to reorganize and verify the relevant data until the credit review committee can determine the credit grade. 6.3.3 Result release
When the evaluation subject releases the credit evaluation results, it shall publicize the methods and standards of active credit evaluation to the public, explain the data sources on which the credit evaluation is based, and bear independent responsibility for the credit evaluation results. 6.3.4
Result tracking
After the credit evaluation results are released, the evaluation subject shall regularly track the credit evaluation results and update the evaluation results in a timely manner. 7 Report Writing
7.1 Basic Requirements
Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Report shall follow the principles of authenticity, completeness, simplicity and readability. Quantitative analysis shall be made on the credit risk of qualified suppliers as much as possible. If quantitative analysis is not suitable, a qualitative description shall be made in a targeted manner, and the identification of the evaluation results shall be clearly explained.
Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Report shall be stamped with the valid signature of the evaluation subject. 7.2 Report Content
Report Structure
Qualified Supplier Credit Evaluation Report shall include the cover, statement, overview, main text, appendix, etc. 7.2.2 Cover
The report cover shall include the following contents:
Report Number;
Report Name:
Name of Evaluation Object;
Name of Evaluation Subject;
Date of Report Issuance;
Others.
7.2.3 Statement
The report statement should include the following:
Explanatory text indicating that the report content is fair, compliant, and exempt from liability; Explanation of follow-up evaluation;
Statement of voluntary acceptance of supervision:
Validity period of evaluation results;
Others.
7.2.4 Overview
The report overview should include the following:
-Name of the evaluation object;
Credit rating;
Description of the credit rating;
Members of the evaluation team;
Name of the evaluation subject;
-Time of issuing the report
-Others.
7.2.5Main text
The main text of the report shall include the following contents:
Comprehensive quality of qualified suppliers;
Financial strength of qualified suppliers;
Sustainable supply capacity of qualified suppliers;
Development potential of qualified suppliers;
Trading credit of qualified suppliers;
Social responsibility of qualified suppliers;
Others.
The appendix of the report shall include the following contents:
Definition of credit rating and symbol;
Credit evaluation method and process;
Explanation of evaluation data;
Related qualifications and certification materials of the evaluation object; Related social credit records of the evaluation object; Other materials that need to be attached.
8Evaluation information managementbzxz.net
GB/T23793—2017
The evaluation subject shall establish archives and their management system. The data and information used for credit evaluation, including copies and other materials, shall be classified and archived.
8.2 The evaluation subject shall strictly keep confidential information it obtains, and shall separately archive relevant confidential information. Its database facilities shall meet the security level required by government regulatory authorities.
GB/T23793—2017
Appendix A
(Normative Appendix)
Special indicators and instructions for credit evaluation of qualified suppliers Special indicators and instructions for credit evaluation of qualified suppliers are shown in Table A.1. Table A.1Special indicators and explanations for credit evaluation of qualified suppliersMajor categories of special indicators
Comprehensive quality
Financial strength
Sustainability
Supply capacity
Development potential
Subcategories of special indicators
Asset status
Situation of branches
Informatization level
Situation of investors
External financing channels
Average operating income
Average profit
Product or business structure
Product quality status
External evaluation of products
Evaluation of raw material supply quality
Handling of emergency situations
Insurance status
Price response status
Policy adaptation Situation
Sales situation
After-sales management
Safety management
Supply management
Supply chain management
Industry and industrial policy
Enterprise industry status
Indicator item description
The value of movable, immovable, foreign investment and intangible assets (reference asset book value, net realizable value and written appraisal value) provided by the supplier The number and regional distribution of the supplier's branches The situation of meeting the supplier's business development needs The situation of the supplier's internal use of automated office systems, the implementation of network management, and the number of computers to meet business needs; the independence of the Yichuan website, the degree of content perfection, commodity trading functions and language types
Supplier investment The financial strength of the investor
The smoothness of the supplier's financing channels, including the bank's credit lineThe average of the supplier's main business income in the past three yearsThe average of the supplier's net profit in the past three years
The degree of series, specialization or diversification of the supplier's products or businessesThe quality level of the supplier's products (services), and the status of technical and quality conformity certificationCustomer evaluation of the product (service), product (service) quality violations, complaints, etc.The source of the supplier's raw materials, supply quality, supply conditions, etc.The degree to which the supplier cooperates with the purchaser's request to increase or decrease orders, and the response to the purchaser's sporadic or urgent orders
The supplier's commercial insurance coverage in accordance with regulations or on its own initiativeThe supplier's supply insurance coverage caused by changes in the raw material supply price or product purchase price Response to changes in supply and demand elasticity
Suppliers' adaptation to changes in industry and regulatory policies Changes in sales volume of different products (services) of suppliers in the past three years, market distribution and share, etc. Supplier's after-sales service level, customer evaluation of after-sales service, recall management, etc. Supplier's safety system construction and safety accidents, as well as the ability to effectively deal with safety accidents, etc.
Suppliers' production capacity, operating rate, and maximum supply capacity under emergency conditions Suppliers' position in the supply chain, and their connections and management with upstream and downstream companies National macroeconomic policies on industry development, support, maintenance, restriction, elimination, environmental pollution and governance Profit margin of the supplier's industry, its competitiveness with other industries, and the influence of the supplier in the industry, etc.
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.