SJ 1.5-1987 Regulations and requirements for the formulation and revision of technical standards for the electronics industry Draft standard (submitted for review) Letter review procedure SJ1.5-1987 standard download decompression password: www.bzxz.net

1 Subject content and scope of application
1.1 Subject content
Ministry standards of the Ministry of Electronics Industry of the People's Republic of China Formulation and revision of technical standards for the electronics industry
Related regulations and requirements
Draft standard (draft for review) letter review procedure
This standard specifies the working procedures for the electronic industry technical standards when the letter review method is adopted. 1.2 Scope of application
This standard applies to national standards, national military standards, professional standards (ministerial standards) and ministerial guiding technical documents in the electronic industry technical standards.
2 Reference standards
SJ1.4 Relevant regulations and requirements for the formulation and revision of technical standards for the electronics industry Phase division and requirements for the implementation of the plan for the formulation of technical standards for the electronics industry
SJ1.7 Relevant regulations and requirements for the formulation and revision of technical standards for the electronics industry Requirements for the completeness of materials when submitting a draft standard (draft for approval) for approvalwww.bzxz.net
SJ1.10 Relevant regulations and requirements for the formulation and revision of technical standards for the electronics industry Main contents of the minutes of the review meeting (or review conclusion) of the draft standard (draft for review) 3 Conditions for letter review
After summarizing and analyzing the replies of the sponsor to the draft standard (draft for comments), a summary table of opinions shall be listed. If the units whose opinions are solicited have no major differences of opinion on the revisions to the draft standard (draft for comments), the sponsor shall prepare the draft standard (draft for review) and its preparation instructions on this basis, and propose a list of units participating in the letter review. Only after the preliminary review and approval by the Ministry's Standardization Research Institute can the sponsor issue a document for letter review. For standard projects under the unified management of professional standardization technical committees, the review work shall be organized and implemented by each professional standardization technical committee. It can also be negotiated between the sponsor of the standard project and the committee secretariat, and the sponsor shall issue a document for review. 4 Documents to be sent for review and review units
4.1 Documents to be sent for review
4.1.1 Review documents [format according to Appendix D (Supplement) of SJ1.4], with a list of review units attached 4.1.2 A copy of the draft standard (submitted for review); approved by the Ministry of Electronics Industry of the People's Republic of China on November 10, 1987 and implemented on January 1, 1988
4.1.3 Instructions for the preparation of the draft standard (submitted for review) and other relevant annexes 4.1.4 A summary of opinions on the draft standard (draft for comments) One copy: 4.1.5 A review form for the draft standard (draft for review) [for national standards, professional (departmental) standards and departmental guiding technical documents, the format is in Appendix A (supplement)] or a review form for review (for national military standards, the format is in Appendix B (supplement) Two copies:
4.1.6 A copy of other relevant documents.
4.2 Review unit
Review form for the draft standard (draft for review) The units should include the main relevant production, use, scientific research, testing units and colleges and universities.
In principle, the number of units participating in the letter review should be more than the number of units participating in the meeting review. 5 Time limit for letter review
The time limit for letter review is generally two months. The units participating in the letter review should fill in the form according to the requirements of the letter review form for the draft standard (draft for review) or the letter review opinion form for the draft for review within the specified time, and promptly send a copy to the standard sponsor, the Ministry's standardization research institute or the secretariat of the professional standardization technical committee (when the standard is reviewed by the professional standardization technical committee).
6 Processing of letter review results
6.1 After the standard sponsor receives the letter review form for the draft standard (draft for review) or the letter review opinion form for the draft for review sent back by the units participating in the letter review on time, it should promptly comprehensively process the opinions of the letter review, list the letter review opinion summary processing table [the format is in accordance with Appendix A (Supplement) of SJ14) and write the letter review conclusion (refer to the content of SJ1.10). The review conclusions of the national military standard project and the names of the participating review units shall be filled in the national military standard application form [format see SJ1.7 Appendix C (Supplement)].
6.2 If the review form of the draft standard (submission draft) or the review opinion form of the submission draft is overdue (based on the date of the postmark), there is no reason to object, no statement, and the official seal of the unit is not affixed (the seal of the unit's internal functional department is invalid), it shall be deemed that the draft standard (submission draft) is approved for review and treatment. 6.3 If there are no major differences of opinion and substantive objections and more than three-quarters of the votes agree, the standard sponsor shall, on this basis, submit the draft standard (submission draft) and preparation instructions and other necessary materials and documents for submission, and perform the submission procedures.
6.4 If there are major differences of opinion in the review form or the review opinion form of the draft standard (submission draft), more than one-quarter of the units are opposed, then the review will not pass. The sponsor of the standard shall find out the reasons, write a written report and send it to the Ministry of Standardization Research Institute or the Secretariat of the Professional Standardization Technical Committee, and copy it to the Ministry of Standardization Research Institute (when the standard project is reviewed by the Professional Standardization Technical Committee), and continue to work on specific issues, and propose the draft standard (second draft for review) for re-review by letter, or change it to meeting review. 2
Name of the draft standard:
Responsible drafting unit:
Appendix A
Format of the letter review form for the draft standard (draft for review) (supplement)
Letter review form for the draft standard (draft for review)
Partially agree
Disagree
Opinions and reasons:
Unit that proposes opinions (stamp)
Individual that proposes opinions (signature):
Note, ① When expressing your opinion on the draft standard (draft for review), you only need to mark the corresponding "/" in the corresponding form. When partially agreeing or disagreeing, the opinions and reasons should be clearly stated. If the space is not enough, an additional sheet of paper can be attached.
② No opinions were raised within two months. Two opinions were marked at the same time. Those without the official seal of the unit shall be treated as agreeing. ·3
Standard Name
Article Number
Appendix B
Format of the Letter Review Opinion Form for the Draft for Review
(Supplement)
Form of the Letter Review Opinion Form for the Draft for Review
Instructions, 1. When expressing your attitude towards the three situations in the "Conclusion and Opinion" column, just mark the name and address of the person filling out the form
.
2. Please mail this form to:
Conclusion and opinion
"Disagree after modification"
Name of technical person in charge, date
Form filling unit (seal)
Additional notes:
This standard was drafted by the Standard and Quality Department and the Standardization Research Institute of the Ministry of Electronics Industry.
Tip: This standard content only shows part of the intercepted content of the complete standard. If you need the complete standard, please go to the top to download the complete standard document for free.